Abbas M Hassan1, Huan T Nguyen1,2, Joseph P Corkum1, Jun Liu1, Sahil K Kapur1, Carrie K Chu1, Nina Tamirisa3, Anaeze C Offodile4,5. 1. Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. 2. McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA. 3. Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. 4. Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. acoffodile@mdanderson.org. 5. Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. acoffodile@mdanderson.org.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Neighborhood-level factors have been shown to influence surgical outcomes through material deprivation, psychosocial mechanisms, health behaviors, and access to resources. To date, no study has examined the relationship between area-level deprivation (ADI) and post-mastectomy outcomes. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey of adult female breast cancer patients who underwent lumpectomy or mastectomy between January 2018 to June 2019 was carried out. Patient-specific characteristics and ADI information were abstracted and correlated with postoperative global- (SF-12) and condition-specific (BREAST-Q) quality-of-life performance via multivariable regression. Patients were classified into three ADI terciles: 0-39 (low deprivation), 40-59 (moderate deprivation), and 60-100 (high deprivation). RESULTS: A total of 564 consecutive patients were identified, being mostly white (75%) with mean age of 60.2 ± 12.4 years, median body mass index of 27.8 [interquartile range (IQR) 24.3-32.2) kg/m2, median Charlson Comorbidity Index of 3 (IQR 2-5), and mean ADI of 42.3 ± 25.7. African American and Hispanic patients and those with high BMI were more likely to reside in highly deprived neighborhoods (p = 0.003 and p < 0.001). In adjusted models, patients in highly deprived neighborhoods had significantly lower mean SF-12 physical (44.9 [95% CI, 43.8-46.0] versus 44.9 [95% CI, 43.7-46.1] versus 46.3 [95% CI, 45.3-47.3], p = 0.03) and BREAST-Q psychosocial well-being scores (63.5 [95% CI, 59.32-67.8] versus 69.3 [95% CI, 65.1-73.6] versus 69.7 [95% CI, 66.4-73.1], p = 0.01) relative to moderate- and low-deprivation groups. CONCLUSIONS: Patients residing in the most deprived neighborhoods were identified to have worse psychological well-being and quality-of-life. The ADI should be incorporated into the shared decision-making process and perioperative counseling to engender value-based and personalized care, especially for vulnerable populations.
BACKGROUND: Neighborhood-level factors have been shown to influence surgical outcomes through material deprivation, psychosocial mechanisms, health behaviors, and access to resources. To date, no study has examined the relationship between area-level deprivation (ADI) and post-mastectomy outcomes. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey of adult female breast cancer patients who underwent lumpectomy or mastectomy between January 2018 to June 2019 was carried out. Patient-specific characteristics and ADI information were abstracted and correlated with postoperative global- (SF-12) and condition-specific (BREAST-Q) quality-of-life performance via multivariable regression. Patients were classified into three ADI terciles: 0-39 (low deprivation), 40-59 (moderate deprivation), and 60-100 (high deprivation). RESULTS: A total of 564 consecutive patients were identified, being mostly white (75%) with mean age of 60.2 ± 12.4 years, median body mass index of 27.8 [interquartile range (IQR) 24.3-32.2) kg/m2, median Charlson Comorbidity Index of 3 (IQR 2-5), and mean ADI of 42.3 ± 25.7. African American and Hispanic patients and those with high BMI were more likely to reside in highly deprived neighborhoods (p = 0.003 and p < 0.001). In adjusted models, patients in highly deprived neighborhoods had significantly lower mean SF-12 physical (44.9 [95% CI, 43.8-46.0] versus 44.9 [95% CI, 43.7-46.1] versus 46.3 [95% CI, 45.3-47.3], p = 0.03) and BREAST-Q psychosocial well-being scores (63.5 [95% CI, 59.32-67.8] versus 69.3 [95% CI, 65.1-73.6] versus 69.7 [95% CI, 66.4-73.1], p = 0.01) relative to moderate- and low-deprivation groups. CONCLUSIONS: Patients residing in the most deprived neighborhoods were identified to have worse psychological well-being and quality-of-life. The ADI should be incorporated into the shared decision-making process and perioperative counseling to engender value-based and personalized care, especially for vulnerable populations.
Authors: Noelle S Arroyo; Robert S White; Licia K Gaber-Baylis; Melvin La; Andrew D Fisher; Mahendranauth Samaru Journal: Popul Health Manag Date: 2018-06-29 Impact factor: 2.459
Authors: Robert B Hawkins; Eric J Charles; J Hunter Mehaffey; Carlin A Williams; William P Robinson; Gilbert R Upchurch; John A Kern; Margaret C Tracci Journal: J Vasc Surg Date: 2019-06-14 Impact factor: 4.268
Authors: Hilary Daniel; Sue S Bornstein; Gregory C Kane; Jan K Carney; Heather E Gantzer; Tracey L Henry; Joshua D Lenchus; Joseph M Li; Bridget M McCandless; Beth R Nalitt; Lavanya Viswanathan; Caleb J Murphy; Ayeetin M Azah; Lianne Marks Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2018-04-17 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Isabel C Dos Santos Marques; Lauren M Theiss; Lauren N Wood; Drew J Gunnells; Robert H Hollis; Karin M Hardiman; Jamie A Cannon; Melanie S Morris; Gregory D Kennedy; Daniel I Chu Journal: Am J Surg Date: 2020-12-07 Impact factor: 2.565
Authors: Adrian Diaz; J Madison Hyer; Elizabeth Barmash; Rosevine Azap; Anghela Z Paredes; Timothy M Pawlik Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2021-12-01 Impact factor: 13.787