Alexia M Torke1, George Fitchett2, Saneta Maiko3, Emily S Burke4, James E Slaven5, Beth Newton Watson6, Steven Ivy7, Patrick O Monahan5. 1. Indiana University (IU) Center for Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute, Inc., Indianapolis, Indiana, USA; IU Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA; Daniel F. Evans Center for Spiritual and Religious Values in Healthcare, IU Health, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA. Electronic address: atorke@iupui.edu. 2. Department of Religion, Health and Human Values, College of Health Sciences, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA. 3. Indiana University (IU) Center for Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute, Inc., Indianapolis, Indiana, USA; Indiana Conference, United Methodist Church, Greenwood, Indiana, USA. 4. Indiana University (IU) Center for Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute, Inc., Indianapolis, Indiana, USA. 5. IU Department of Biostatistics, IU School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA. 6. Indiana Conference, United Methodist Church, Greenwood, Indiana, USA. 7. Association for Clinical Pastoral Education, Decatur, Georgia, USA.
Abstract
CONTEXT: Although religion and spirituality are important to surrogate decision makers, little is known about the role of religion in decision making regarding life-sustaining treatments. OBJECTIVES: To determine the relationships between dimensions of religion and spirituality and medical treatment decisions made by surrogates. METHODS: This prospective observational study enrolled patient/surrogate dyads from three hospitals in one metropolitan area. Eligible patients were 65 years or older and admitted to the medicine or medical intensive care services. Baseline surveys between hospital days 2 and 10 assessed seven dimensions of religion and spirituality. Chart reviews of the electronic medical record and regional health information exchange six months after enrollment identified the use of life-sustaining treatments and hospice for patients who died. RESULTS: There were 291 patient/surrogate dyads. When adjusting for other religious dimensions, demographic, and illness factors, only surrogates' belief in miracles was significantly associated with a lower surrogate preference for do-not-resuscitate status (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.39; 95% CI 0.19, 0.78). Among patients who died, higher surrogate intrinsic religiosity was associated with lower patient receipt of life-sustaining treatments within the last 30 days (aOR 0.66; 95% CI 0.45, 0.97). Belief in miracles (aOR 0.30; 95% CI 0.10, 0.96) and higher intrinsic religiosity (aOR 0.70; 95% CI 0.53, 0.93) were associated with lower hospice utilization. CONCLUSION: Few religious variables are associated with end-of-life preferences or treatment. Belief in miracles and intrinsic religiosity may affect treatment and should be identified and explored with surrogates by trained chaplains or other clinicians with appropriate training.
CONTEXT: Although religion and spirituality are important to surrogate decision makers, little is known about the role of religion in decision making regarding life-sustaining treatments. OBJECTIVES: To determine the relationships between dimensions of religion and spirituality and medical treatment decisions made by surrogates. METHODS: This prospective observational study enrolled patient/surrogate dyads from three hospitals in one metropolitan area. Eligible patients were 65 years or older and admitted to the medicine or medical intensive care services. Baseline surveys between hospital days 2 and 10 assessed seven dimensions of religion and spirituality. Chart reviews of the electronic medical record and regional health information exchange six months after enrollment identified the use of life-sustaining treatments and hospice for patients who died. RESULTS: There were 291 patient/surrogate dyads. When adjusting for other religious dimensions, demographic, and illness factors, only surrogates' belief in miracles was significantly associated with a lower surrogate preference for do-not-resuscitate status (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.39; 95% CI 0.19, 0.78). Among patients who died, higher surrogate intrinsic religiosity was associated with lower patient receipt of life-sustaining treatments within the last 30 days (aOR 0.66; 95% CI 0.45, 0.97). Belief in miracles (aOR 0.30; 95% CI 0.10, 0.96) and higher intrinsic religiosity (aOR 0.70; 95% CI 0.53, 0.93) were associated with lower hospice utilization. CONCLUSION: Few religious variables are associated with end-of-life preferences or treatment. Belief in miracles and intrinsic religiosity may affect treatment and should be identified and explored with surrogates by trained chaplains or other clinicians with appropriate training.
Authors: Tracy Balboni; Michael Balboni; M Elizabeth Paulk; Andrea Phelps; Alexi Wright; John Peteet; Susan Block; Chris Lathan; Tyler Vanderweele; Holly Prigerson Journal: Cancer Date: 2011-05-11 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Elizabeth A Boyd; Bernard Lo; Leah R Evans; Grace Malvar; Latifat Apatira; John M Luce; Douglas B White Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2010-05 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Tracy A Balboni; Lauren C Vanderwerker; Susan D Block; M Elizabeth Paulk; Christopher S Lathan; John R Peteet; Holly G Prigerson Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2007-02-10 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Vanessa Raymont; William Bingley; Alec Buchanan; Anthony S David; Peter Hayward; Simon Wessely; Matthew Hotopf Journal: Lancet Date: 2004 Oct 16-22 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Angelo E Volandes; Michael Paasche-Orlow; Muriel R Gillick; E F Cook; Shimon Shaykevich; Elmer D Abbo; Lisa Lehmann Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2008-06 Impact factor: 2.947
Authors: Lisa D Chew; Joan M Griffin; Melissa R Partin; Siamak Noorbaloochi; Joseph P Grill; Annamay Snyder; Katharine A Bradley; Sean M Nugent; Alisha D Baines; Michelle Vanryn Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2008-03-12 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Susan L Mitchell; Joan M Teno; Dan K Kiely; Michele L Shaffer; Richard N Jones; Holly G Prigerson; Ladislav Volicer; Jane L Givens; Mary Beth Hamel Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2009-10-15 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Andrea K Knies; Qiang Zhang; Prerak Juthani; Stephanie Tu; Jolanta Pach; Aida Martinez; Joan K Monin; David Y Hwang Journal: Crit Care Explor Date: 2020-07-06