Literature DB >> 18588408

Health literacy not race predicts end-of-life care preferences.

Angelo E Volandes1, Michael Paasche-Orlow, Muriel R Gillick, E F Cook, Shimon Shaykevich, Elmer D Abbo, Lisa Lehmann.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Several studies have reported that African Americans are more likely than whites to prefer aggressive treatments at the end of life.
OBJECTIVE: Since the medical information presented to subjects is frequently complex, we hypothesized that apparent differences in end-of-life preferences and decision making may be due to disparities in health literacy. A video of a patient with advanced dementia may overcome communication barriers associated with low health literacy.
DESIGN: Before and after oral survey. PARTICIPANTS: Subjects presenting to their primary care doctors.
METHODS: Subjects were asked their preferences for end-of-life care after they heard a verbal description of advanced dementia. Subjects then viewed a 2-minute video of a patient with advanced dementia and were asked again about their preferences. For the analysis, preferences were dichotomized into comfort care and aggressive care. Health literacy was measured using the Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine (REALM) and subjects were divided into three literacy categories: low (0-45, sixth grade and below), marginal (46-60, seventh to eighth grade) and adequate (61-66, ninth grade and above). Unadjusted and adjusted logistic regression models were fit using stepwise algorithms to examine factors related to initial preferences before the video.
RESULTS: A total of 80 African Americans and 64 whites completed the interview. In unadjusted analyses, African Americans were more likely than whites to have preferences for aggressive care after the verbal description, odds ratio (OR) 4.8 (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.1-10.9). Subjects with low or marginal health literacy were also more likely than subjects with adequate health literacy to have preferences for aggressive care after the verbal description, OR 17.3 (95% CI 6.0-49.9) and OR 11.3 (95% CI 4.2-30.8) respectively. In adjusted analyses, health literacy (low health literacy: OR 7.1, 95% CI 2.1-24.2; marginal health literacy OR 5.1, 95% CI 1.6-16.3) but not race (OR 1.1, 95% CI 0.3-3.2) was an independent predictor of preferences after the verbal description. After watching a video of advanced dementia, there were no significant differences in the distribution of preferences by race or health literacy.
CONCLUSIONS: Health literacy and not race was an independent predictor of end-of-life preferences after hearing a verbal description of advanced dementia. In addition, after viewing a video of a patient with advanced dementia there were no longer any differences in the distribution of preferences according to race and health literacy. These findings suggest that clinical practice and research relating to end-of-life preferences may need to focus on a patient education model incorporating the use of decision aids such as video to ensure informed decision-making.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18588408     DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2007.0224

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Palliat Med        ISSN: 1557-7740            Impact factor:   2.947


  84 in total

1.  The Intersections Between Social Determinants of Health, Health Literacy, and Health Disparities.

Authors:  Dean Schillinger
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2020-06-25

2.  Hospice referrals and code status: outcomes of inpatient palliative care consultations among Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders with cancer.

Authors:  Christina L Bell; Meiko Kuriya; Daniel Fischberg
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2011-04-22       Impact factor: 3.612

3.  Can integrating health literacy into the patient-centered medical home help us weather the perfect storm?

Authors:  Jessica R Ridpath; Eric B Larson; Sarah M Greene
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Update in palliative care--2011.

Authors:  Patricia F Harris; Robert M Arnold; Ursula K Braun; Erik Fromme; Rahwa Ghermay; Stephanie Harman; Robert L Jayes; Anne M Walling
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Hospice knowledge and intentions among Latinos using safety-net clinics.

Authors:  Claire Selsky; Barbara Kreling; Gheorghe Luta; Solomon B Makgoeng; Jessika Gomez-Duarte; Andrea Gabriela A Barbo; Jeanne S Mandelblatt
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2012-06-25       Impact factor: 2.947

6.  Effect of a disease-specific planning intervention on surrogate understanding of patient goals for future medical treatment.

Authors:  Karin T Kirchhoff; Bernard J Hammes; Karen A Kehl; Linda A Briggs; Roger L Brown
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 5.562

7.  Evaluating the Use of Plain Language in a Cancer Clinical Trial Website/App.

Authors:  Paula L Schultz; Regina Carlisle; Chesley Cheatham; Melissa O'Grady
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 2.037

8.  The Influence of Race/Ethnicity and Education on Family Ratings of the Quality of Dying in the ICU.

Authors:  Janet J Lee; Ann C Long; J Randall Curtis; Ruth A Engelberg
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 3.612

9.  Trust Building Recruitment Strategies for Researchers Conducting Studies in African American (AA) Churches: Lessons Learned.

Authors:  Gloria Bonner; Sharon Williams; Diana Wilkie; Alysha Hart; Glenda Burnett; Geraldine Peacock
Journal:  Am J Hosp Palliat Care       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 2.500

10.  Health Literacy and Education as Mediators of Racial Disparities in Patient Activation Within an Elderly Patient Cohort.

Authors:  Nwamaka D Eneanya; Michael Winter; Howard Cabral; Katherine Waite; Lori Henault; Timothy Bickmore; Amresh Hanchate; Michael Wolf; Michael K Paasche-Orlow
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2016
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.