Literature DB >> 15016925

Effects of religiosity on patients' perceptions of do-not-resuscitate status.

Maria A Sullivan1, Philip R Muskin, Shara J Feldman, Elizabeth Haase.   

Abstract

Forty-eight oncology inpatients participated in a survey designed to characterize their understanding of and beliefs about do-not-resuscitate (DNR) decisions and to identify dimensions of religiosity associated with moral beliefs about DNR decisions. Seventy-five percent of the patients believed they understood the meaning of "DNR," but only 32% were able to provide an accurate definition. Seventeen percent believed that DNR decisions are morally wrong, and 23% believed that they are equivalent to suicide. Those who lacked an accurate understanding of DNR status were significantly more likely to perceive them as morally wrong. Gender, but not religious denomination, was significantly related to patients' attitudes about the morality of DNR decisions. The belief that DNR decisions are morally wrong was predicted by certain religious practices, including near-daily meditation, near-daily thinking about God, and the current practice of meditation, and by endorsement of the statement, "My faith sometimes restricts my action."

Entities:  

Keywords:  Death and Euthanasia; Empirical Approach

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15016925     DOI: 10.1176/appi.psy.45.2.119

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychosomatics        ISSN: 0033-3182            Impact factor:   2.386


  7 in total

1.  The Association of Surrogate Decision Makers' Religious and Spiritual Beliefs With End-of-Life Decisions.

Authors:  Alexia M Torke; George Fitchett; Saneta Maiko; Emily S Burke; James E Slaven; Beth Newton Watson; Steven Ivy; Patrick O Monahan
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2019-09-17       Impact factor: 3.612

2.  Religious coping and behavioral disengagement: opposing influences on advance care planning and receipt of intensive care near death.

Authors:  Paul K Maciejewski; Andrea C Phelps; Elizabeth L Kacel; Tracy A Balboni; Michael Balboni; Alexi A Wright; William Pirl; Holly G Prigerson
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2011-03-29       Impact factor: 3.894

3.  Validation of the Family Inpatient Communication Survey.

Authors:  Alexia M Torke; Patrick Monahan; Christopher M Callahan; Paul R Helft; Greg A Sachs; Lucia D Wocial; James E Slaven; Kianna Montz; Lev Inger; Emily S Burke
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2016-10-05       Impact factor: 3.612

4.  Psychological Attachment Orientations of Surrogate Decision-Makers and Goals-of-Care Decisions for Brain Injury Patients in ICUs.

Authors:  Andrea K Knies; Qiang Zhang; Prerak Juthani; Stephanie Tu; Jolanta Pach; Aida Martinez; Joan K Monin; David Y Hwang
Journal:  Crit Care Explor       Date:  2020-07-06

5.  Religious coping and use of intensive life-prolonging care near death in patients with advanced cancer.

Authors:  Andrea C Phelps; Paul K Maciejewski; Matthew Nilsson; Tracy A Balboni; Alexi A Wright; M Elizabeth Paulk; Elizabeth Trice; Deborah Schrag; John R Peteet; Susan D Block; Holly G Prigerson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Religion and Spirituality in Surrogate Decision Making for Hospitalized Older Adults.

Authors:  Kristin N Geros-Willfond; Steven S Ivy; Kianna Montz; Sara E Bohan; Alexia M Torke
Journal:  J Relig Health       Date:  2016-06

7.  Patient-physician communication about code status preferences: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Wadih Rhondali; Pedro Perez-Cruz; David Hui; Gary B Chisholm; Shalini Dalal; Walter Baile; Eva Chittenden; Eduardo Bruera
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2013-04-05       Impact factor: 6.860

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.