Literature DB >> 31538209

[Computational psychiatry : Data-driven vs. mechanistic approaches].

Jakob Kaminski1,2, Teresa Katthagen1, Florian Schlagenhauf3,4.   

Abstract

The emerging research field of so-called computational psychiatry attempts to contribute to an understanding of complex psychiatric phenomena by applying computational methods and to promote the translation of neuroscientific research results into clinical practice. This article presents this field of research using selected examples based on the distinction between data-driven and theory-driven approaches. Exemplary for a data-driven approach are studies to predict clinical outcome, for example, in persons with a high-risk state for psychosis or on the response to pharmacological treatment for depression. Theory-driven approaches attempt to describe the mechanisms of altered information processing as the cause of psychiatric symptoms at the behavioral and neuronal level. In computational models possible mechanisms can be described that may have produced the measured behavioral or neuronal data. For example, in schizophrenia patients the clinical phenomenon of aberrant salience has been described as learning irrelevant information or cognitive deficits have been linked to connectivity changes in frontoparietal networks. Computational psychiatry can make important contributions to the prediction of individual clinical courses as well as to a mechanistic understanding of psychiatric symptoms. For this a further development of reliable and valid methods across different disciplines is indispensable.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Addictive disorders; Cognitive neurosciences; Dynamic causal modelling; Reinforcement learning; Schizophrenia

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31538209     DOI: 10.1007/s00115-019-00796-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nervenarzt        ISSN: 0028-2804            Impact factor:   1.214


  28 in total

1.  Pavlovian-to-instrumental transfer effects in the nucleus accumbens relate to relapse in alcohol dependence.

Authors:  Maria Garbusow; Daniel J Schad; Miriam Sebold; Eva Friedel; Nadine Bernhardt; Stefan P Koch; Bruno Steinacher; Norbert Kathmann; Dirk E M Geurts; Christian Sommer; Dirk K Müller; Stephan Nebe; Sören Paul; Hans-Ulrich Wittchen; Ulrich S Zimmermann; Henrik Walter; Michael N Smolka; Philipp Sterzer; Michael A Rapp; Quentin J M Huys; Florian Schlagenhauf; Andreas Heinz
Journal:  Addict Biol       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 4.280

2.  Reduced prefrontal-parietal effective connectivity and working memory deficits in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Lorenz Deserno; Philipp Sterzer; Torsten Wüstenberg; Andreas Heinz; Florian Schlagenhauf
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Characterizing a psychiatric symptom dimension related to deficits in goal-directed control.

Authors:  Claire M Gillan; Michal Kosinski; Robert Whelan; Elizabeth A Phelps; Nathaniel D Daw
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 8.140

Review 4.  Generative models for clinical applications in computational psychiatry.

Authors:  Stefan Frässle; Yu Yao; Dario Schöbi; Eduardo A Aponte; Jakob Heinzle; Klaas E Stephan
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci       Date:  2018-01-25

5.  Neural mechanisms of reinforcement learning in unmedicated patients with major depressive disorder.

Authors:  Marcus Rothkirch; Jonas Tonn; Stephan Köhler; Philipp Sterzer
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 13.501

6.  Computational psychiatry.

Authors:  P Read Montague; Raymond J Dolan; Karl J Friston; Peter Dayan
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 20.229

7.  Cross-trial prediction of treatment outcome in depression: a machine learning approach.

Authors:  Adam Mourad Chekroud; Ryan Joseph Zotti; Zarrar Shehzad; Ralitza Gueorguieva; Marcia K Johnson; Madhukar H Trivedi; Tyrone D Cannon; John Harrison Krystal; Philip Robert Corlett
Journal:  Lancet Psychiatry       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 27.083

8.  When Habits Are Dangerous: Alcohol Expectancies and Habitual Decision Making Predict Relapse in Alcohol Dependence.

Authors:  Miriam Sebold; Stephan Nebe; Maria Garbusow; Matthias Guggenmos; Daniel J Schad; Anne Beck; Soeren Kuitunen-Paul; Christian Sommer; Robin Frank; Peter Neu; Ulrich S Zimmermann; Michael A Rapp; Michael N Smolka; Quentin J M Huys; Florian Schlagenhauf; Andreas Heinz
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 13.382

9.  Modeling subjective relevance in schizophrenia and its relation to aberrant salience.

Authors:  Teresa Katthagen; Christoph Mathys; Lorenz Deserno; Henrik Walter; Norbert Kathmann; Andreas Heinz; Florian Schlagenhauf
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2018-08-10       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  Striatal dysfunction during reversal learning in unmedicated schizophrenia patients.

Authors:  Florian Schlagenhauf; Quentin J M Huys; Lorenz Deserno; Michael A Rapp; Anne Beck; Hans-Joachim Heinze; Ray Dolan; Andreas Heinz
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 6.556

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  [Negative valence systems in the system of research domain criteria : Empirical results and new developments].

Authors:  Christoph W Korn; Robert C Wolf
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2021-08-05       Impact factor: 1.214

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.