Literature DB >> 29369526

Generative models for clinical applications in computational psychiatry.

Stefan Frässle1, Yu Yao1, Dario Schöbi1, Eduardo A Aponte1, Jakob Heinzle1, Klaas E Stephan1,2.   

Abstract

Despite the success of modern neuroimaging techniques in furthering our understanding of cognitive and pathophysiological processes, translation of these advances into clinically relevant tools has been virtually absent until now. Neuromodeling represents a powerful framework for overcoming this translational deadlock, and the development of computational models to solve clinical problems has become a major scientific goal over the last decade, as reflected by the emergence of clinically oriented neuromodeling fields like Computational Psychiatry, Computational Neurology, and Computational Psychosomatics. Generative models of brain physiology and connectivity in the human brain play a key role in this endeavor, striving for computational assays that can be applied to neuroimaging data from individual patients for differential diagnosis and treatment prediction. In this review, we focus on dynamic causal modeling (DCM) and its use for Computational Psychiatry. DCM is a widely used generative modeling framework for functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and magneto-/electroencephalography (M/EEG) data. This article reviews the basic concepts of DCM, revisits examples where it has proven valuable for addressing clinically relevant questions, and critically discusses methodological challenges and recent methodological advances. We conclude this review with a more general discussion of the promises and pitfalls of generative models in Computational Psychiatry and highlight the path that lies ahead of us. This article is categorized under: Neuroscience > Computation Neuroscience > Clinical Neuroscience.
© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29369526     DOI: 10.1002/wcs.1460

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci        ISSN: 1939-5078


  13 in total

1.  Quantifying mechanisms of cognition with an experiment and modeling ecosystem.

Authors:  Emily R Weichart; Kevin P Darby; Adam W Fenton; Brandon G Jacques; Ryan P Kirkpatrick; Brandon M Turner; Per B Sederberg
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2021-02-18

Review 2.  [Computational psychiatry : Data-driven vs. mechanistic approaches].

Authors:  Jakob Kaminski; Teresa Katthagen; Florian Schlagenhauf
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.214

3.  Markov chain Monte Carlo methods for hierarchical clustering of dynamic causal models.

Authors:  Yu Yao; Klaas E Stephan
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 4.  Theoretical Modeling of Cognitive Dysfunction in Schizophrenia by Means of Errors and Corresponding Brain Networks.

Authors:  Yuliya Zaytseva; Iveta Fajnerová; Boris Dvořáček; Eva Bourama; Ilektra Stamou; Kateřina Šulcová; Jiří Motýl; Jiří Horáček; Mabel Rodriguez; Filip Španiel
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-07-03

Review 5.  Breathlessness and the brain: the role of expectation.

Authors:  Lucy L Marlow; Olivia K Faull; Sarah L Finnegan; Kyle T S Pattinson
Journal:  Curr Opin Support Palliat Care       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 2.302

6.  Increasing robustness of pairwise methods for effective connectivity in magnetic resonance imaging by using fractional moment series of BOLD signal distributions.

Authors:  Natalia Z Bielczyk; Alberto Llera; Jan K Buitelaar; Jeffrey C Glennon; Christian F Beckmann
Journal:  Netw Neurosci       Date:  2019-09-01

7.  Deriving symptom networks from digital phenotyping data in serious mental illness.

Authors:  Ryan Hays; Matcheri Keshavan; Hannah Wisniewski; John Torous
Journal:  BJPsych Open       Date:  2020-11-03

Review 8.  TAPAS: An Open-Source Software Package for Translational Neuromodeling and Computational Psychiatry.

Authors:  Stefan Frässle; Eduardo A Aponte; Saskia Bollmann; Kay H Brodersen; Cao T Do; Olivia K Harrison; Samuel J Harrison; Jakob Heinzle; Sandra Iglesias; Lars Kasper; Ekaterina I Lomakina; Christoph Mathys; Matthias Müller-Schrader; Inês Pereira; Frederike H Petzschner; Sudhir Raman; Dario Schöbi; Birte Toussaint; Lilian A Weber; Yu Yao; Klaas E Stephan
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 4.157

9.  Predicting individual clinical trajectories of depression with generative embedding.

Authors:  Stefan Frässle; Andre F Marquand; Lianne Schmaal; Richard Dinga; Dick J Veltman; Nic J A van der Wee; Marie-José van Tol; Dario Schöbi; Brenda W J H Penninx; Klaas E Stephan
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2020-02-17       Impact factor: 4.881

10.  Atypical processing of uncertainty in individuals at risk for psychosis.

Authors:  David M Cole; Andreea O Diaconescu; Ulrich J Pfeiffer; Kay H Brodersen; Christoph D Mathys; Dominika Julkowski; Stephan Ruhrmann; Leonhard Schilbach; Marc Tittgemeyer; Kai Vogeley; Klaas E Stephan
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2020-03-07       Impact factor: 4.881

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.