Christoph W Korn1, Robert C Wolf2. 1. Klinik für Allgemeine Psychiatrie, Zentrum für Psychosoziale Medizin, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Voßstraße 4, 69115, Heidelberg, Deutschland. Christoph.Korn@med.uni-heidelberg.de. 2. Klinik für Allgemeine Psychiatrie, Zentrum für Psychosoziale Medizin, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Voßstraße 4, 69115, Heidelberg, Deutschland. Christian.Wolf@med.uni-heidelberg.de.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The research domain criteria (RDoC) domain of negative valence systems can be used to subsume long established and recently developed research approaches, which build upon theoretical knowledge and clinical practice of various psychiatric disorders. OBJECTIVE: This article outlines how the five constructs within the RDoC domain of negative valence systems can contribute to integrating empirical studies into a coherent and differentiated biopsychosocial model. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a qualitative review article that summarizes empirical results and discusses new developments on the basis of exemplary studies and selected reviews. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The RDoC domain of negative valence systems differentiates in three constructs the time horizon, in which persons need to adequately react to (1) acute, (2) potential, and (3) sustained threats elicited by negative stimuli or situations. These three constructs can be outlined relatively well with specific experimental paradigms and neuronal circuits. Two further constructs focus on the negative consequences of (4) losses and (5) frustrative non-rewards. The former seems to be currently relatively diffusely defined whereas the latter is clearly circumscribed by its relation to specific forms of aggression. Behavioral, physiological, and neuronal reactions to acute and potential threats can be well compared between humans and animals and can be specified with the help of mathematical models. These models can contribute to a better understanding of how healthy and diseased persons process negative stimuli or situations.
BACKGROUND: The research domain criteria (RDoC) domain of negative valence systems can be used to subsume long established and recently developed research approaches, which build upon theoretical knowledge and clinical practice of various psychiatric disorders. OBJECTIVE: This article outlines how the five constructs within the RDoC domain of negative valence systems can contribute to integrating empirical studies into a coherent and differentiated biopsychosocial model. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a qualitative review article that summarizes empirical results and discusses new developments on the basis of exemplary studies and selected reviews. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The RDoC domain of negative valence systems differentiates in three constructs the time horizon, in which persons need to adequately react to (1) acute, (2) potential, and (3) sustained threats elicited by negative stimuli or situations. These three constructs can be outlined relatively well with specific experimental paradigms and neuronal circuits. Two further constructs focus on the negative consequences of (4) losses and (5) frustrative non-rewards. The former seems to be currently relatively diffusely defined whereas the latter is clearly circumscribed by its relation to specific forms of aggression. Behavioral, physiological, and neuronal reactions to acute and potential threats can be well compared between humans and animals and can be specified with the help of mathematical models. These models can contribute to a better understanding of how healthy and diseased persons process negative stimuli or situations.
Authors: Rotem Botvinik-Nezer; Felix Holzmeister; Colin F Camerer; Anna Dreber; Juergen Huber; Magnus Johannesson; Michael Kirchler; Roni Iwanir; Jeanette A Mumford; R Alison Adcock; Paolo Avesani; Blazej M Baczkowski; Aahana Bajracharya; Leah Bakst; Sheryl Ball; Marco Barilari; Nadège Bault; Derek Beaton; Julia Beitner; Roland G Benoit; Ruud M W J Berkers; Jamil P Bhanji; Bharat B Biswal; Sebastian Bobadilla-Suarez; Tiago Bortolini; Katherine L Bottenhorn; Alexander Bowring; Senne Braem; Hayley R Brooks; Emily G Brudner; Cristian B Calderon; Julia A Camilleri; Jaime J Castrellon; Luca Cecchetti; Edna C Cieslik; Zachary J Cole; Olivier Collignon; Robert W Cox; William A Cunningham; Stefan Czoschke; Kamalaker Dadi; Charles P Davis; Alberto De Luca; Mauricio R Delgado; Lysia Demetriou; Jeffrey B Dennison; Xin Di; Erin W Dickie; Ekaterina Dobryakova; Claire L Donnat; Juergen Dukart; Niall W Duncan; Joke Durnez; Amr Eed; Simon B Eickhoff; Andrew Erhart; Laura Fontanesi; G Matthew Fricke; Shiguang Fu; Adriana Galván; Remi Gau; Sarah Genon; Tristan Glatard; Enrico Glerean; Jelle J Goeman; Sergej A E Golowin; Carlos González-García; Krzysztof J Gorgolewski; Cheryl L Grady; Mikella A Green; João F Guassi Moreira; Olivia Guest; Shabnam Hakimi; J Paul Hamilton; Roeland Hancock; Giacomo Handjaras; Bronson B Harry; Colin Hawco; Peer Herholz; Gabrielle Herman; Stephan Heunis; Felix Hoffstaedter; Jeremy Hogeveen; Susan Holmes; Chuan-Peng Hu; Scott A Huettel; Matthew E Hughes; Vittorio Iacovella; Alexandru D Iordan; Peder M Isager; Ayse I Isik; Andrew Jahn; Matthew R Johnson; Tom Johnstone; Michael J E Joseph; Anthony C Juliano; Joseph W Kable; Michalis Kassinopoulos; Cemal Koba; Xiang-Zhen Kong; Timothy R Koscik; Nuri Erkut Kucukboyaci; Brice A Kuhl; Sebastian Kupek; Angela R Laird; Claus Lamm; Robert Langner; Nina Lauharatanahirun; Hongmi Lee; Sangil Lee; Alexander Leemans; Andrea Leo; Elise Lesage; Flora Li; Monica Y C Li; Phui Cheng Lim; Evan N Lintz; Schuyler W Liphardt; Annabel B Losecaat Vermeer; Bradley C Love; Michael L Mack; Norberto Malpica; Theo Marins; Camille Maumet; Kelsey McDonald; Joseph T McGuire; Helena Melero; Adriana S Méndez Leal; Benjamin Meyer; Kristin N Meyer; Glad Mihai; Georgios D Mitsis; Jorge Moll; Dylan M Nielson; Gustav Nilsonne; Michael P Notter; Emanuele Olivetti; Adrian I Onicas; Paolo Papale; Kaustubh R Patil; Jonathan E Peelle; Alexandre Pérez; Doris Pischedda; Jean-Baptiste Poline; Yanina Prystauka; Shruti Ray; Patricia A Reuter-Lorenz; Richard C Reynolds; Emiliano Ricciardi; Jenny R Rieck; Anais M Rodriguez-Thompson; Anthony Romyn; Taylor Salo; Gregory R Samanez-Larkin; Emilio Sanz-Morales; Margaret L Schlichting; Douglas H Schultz; Qiang Shen; Margaret A Sheridan; Jennifer A Silvers; Kenny Skagerlund; Alec Smith; David V Smith; Peter Sokol-Hessner; Simon R Steinkamp; Sarah M Tashjian; Bertrand Thirion; John N Thorp; Gustav Tinghög; Loreen Tisdall; Steven H Tompson; Claudio Toro-Serey; Juan Jesus Torre Tresols; Leonardo Tozzi; Vuong Truong; Luca Turella; Anna E van 't Veer; Tom Verguts; Jean M Vettel; Sagana Vijayarajah; Khoi Vo; Matthew B Wall; Wouter D Weeda; Susanne Weis; David J White; David Wisniewski; Alba Xifra-Porxas; Emily A Yearling; Sangsuk Yoon; Rui Yuan; Kenneth S L Yuen; Lei Zhang; Xu Zhang; Joshua E Zosky; Thomas E Nichols; Russell A Poldrack; Tom Schonberg Journal: Nature Date: 2020-05-20 Impact factor: 69.504