| Literature DB >> 31534987 |
Hiroshi Fujimaki1, Hajime Matsumine1, Hironobu Osaki2, Yoshifumi Ueta2, Wataru Kamei1, Mari Shimizu1, Kazuki Hashimoto1, Kaori Fujii1, Tomohiko Kazama3, Taro Matsumoto3, Yosuke Niimi1, Mariko Miyata2, Hiroyuki Sakurai1.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Polyglycolic acid (PGA) nerve conduits, an artificial biodegradable nerve regeneration-inducing tube currently used in clinical practice, are effective in regenerating peripheral nerves. Dedifferentiated fat (DFAT) cells differentiate into various cells including adipocytes, osteoblasts, chondrocytes, skeletal muscle cells, and myofibroblasts, when cultured in appropriate differentiation-inducing conditioned culture medium. This study made a hybrid artificial nerve conduit by filling a PGA conduit with DFAT cells, applied the conduit to a rat facial nerve defect model, and investigated the facial nerve regenerative ability of the conduit.Entities:
Keywords: ADSC, adipose-derived stem cell; Adipose tissue; DFAT cells; DFAT, dedifferentiated fat; Nerve regeneration; PGA, polyglycolic acid; PO, propylene oxide; SVF, stromal vascular fraction; Stem cell; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor
Year: 2019 PMID: 31534987 PMCID: PMC6744597 DOI: 10.1016/j.reth.2019.08.004
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Regen Ther ISSN: 2352-3204 Impact factor: 3.419
Fig. 1Microscopic images of dedifferentiated fat (DFAT) cells during culture. (A) At 4 days after the start of ceiling culture, cells maintained the morphology of mature adipocytes. (B) At 7 days, fibroblast-like cells arose from the mature adipocytes. (C) At 11 days, colony formation was observed around the mature adipocytes. The bars indicate 250 μm.
Fig. 2Surgical procedures for making in a facial nerve defect rat model and for transplanting nerve conduits. (A) Preauricular incision with a marginal mandibular extension on the left side of the head for exposing the buccal branch of the facial nerve and the parotid gland. BB indicates buccal branch; MMB, marginal mandibular branch of the facial nerve; PG, parotid grand. (B) A 7-mm defect was made in the buccal branch. Photograph C and D show that polyglycolic acid (PGA) conduits loaded with 10 μL of type I collagen gel with or without DFAT cells was transplanted into the nerve defect and fixed with a two-point mattress suture, respectively. The bars indicate 5 mm.
Fig. 3Schematic overview of the experimental procedures.
Fig. 4Compound muscle action potential (CMAP) analysis. CMAP wave patterns recorded from the whisker pad of rat after supramaximal stimulation in the control (A) and DFAT (B) groups. (C) There were no significant differences between the control and DFAT groups in amplitude (0.88 ± 0.56 mV vs. 2.8 ± 2.5 mV), (D) duration (0.63 ± 0.078 mV vs. 0.60 ± 0.18 mV), and (E) latency (4.38 ± 1.42 ms vs. 4.68 ± 2.27 ms). The bars above and under the columns show the standard deviations (SDs). The abbreviation “n.s.” indicates non-significance.
Fig. 5Schematic illustration of the experimental setup of whisker motion measurement and the result. (A) Whisker motion of the control group was compared with that of dedifferentiated fat (DFAT) cell groups by obtaining differences in the angles between the whiskers at stages of whisker pad relaxation and contraction. (B) In the expanded photograph of the whiskers, the red lines indicate the angles of the whiskers of relaxation and contraction whisker pads. (C) Whisker motion was greater in DFAT group (9.22° ± 0.65°) than in the control group (1.90° ± 0.84°). The bars above and under the columns show the standard deviations (SDs). Two asterisk (**) indicate a probability of less than 0.01 (p < 0.01).
Fig. 6Low magnified microphotographs of the rat brainstem coronal sections stained with fluorescence retrograde neuronal tracers DiI. Photograph A and B show DiI-labeled facial motoneurons in the facial nuclei of the control and dedifferentiated fat (DFAT) cell groups, respectively. Insets show high-power field view of DiI-labeled facial motor neurons. The bars in macrophotographs and the insets indicate 1 mm and 100 μm respectively.
Fig. 7Microscopic images of the autograft and regenerated nerves in the control groups and dedifferentiated fat (DFAT) cells. Regenerated nerves were much thicker and stronger in DFAT group (B) than in the control group (A). The bars in photograph A and B indicate 5 mm. Photograph C and D shows the cross-sections of the central part of toluidine blue stained regenerated nerves. (C) In the control group, the regenerated nerve was composed of a single fascicular nerve with a few thin blood vessels coursing along the regenerated nerves with axonal regeneration appearing in a smaller area than in DFAT group. The bars indicate 250 μm. (D) In DFAT group, the regenerated nerve was composed of a single fascicular nerve with dense axonal regeneration in the regenerated nerve and thick axial vessels coursing along the epineurium.
Fig. 8Transmission electron microphotographs of the cross-sections of the central parts of the regenerated nerves at 13 weeks after transplantation. Microphotograph A and B show the cross-section of the nerve in the control and DFAT groups, respectively. The bar indicate 5 μm at a magnification of 3550.
Fig. 9Statistics of the regenerated nerves in the control and dedifferentiated fat (DFAT) cells groups. (A) The number of myelinated fibers in DFAT group was higher than the control group (1606 ± 806 vs. 543 ± 478). (B) Fiber diameter was larger in DFAT group than in the control group (5.47 ± 1.71 μm vs. 5.08 ± 2.00 μm). (C) There were no significant differences in axon diameter between the control and DFAT groups (4.15 ± 1.86 μm vs. 4.33 ± 1.51 μm). (D) Myelin thickness was greater in DFAT group than in the control group (0.57 ± 0.16 μm vs. 0.46 ± 0.14 μm). (E) G ratio, which was calculated by dividing axon diameter by fiber diameter, was lower in DFAT group than in the control group (0.78 ± 0.06 μm vs. 0.80 ± 0.08 μm). The bars above and under the columns show the standard deviations (SDs). One (*) and two asterisks (**) show probabilities of less than 0.05 (p < 0.05) and less than 0.01 (p < 0.01), respectively. The abbreviation “n.s.” indicates non-significance.