BACKGROUND: In the United States, the incidence of craniosynostosis (premature fusion of the sutures of the cranial vault) is one in 2000 to 3000 live births. The condition can cause increased intracranial pressure, severely altered head shape, and mental retardation. The authors have previously described a colony of rabbits with heritable coronal suture synostosis. This model has been instrumental in describing the postsurgical craniofacial growth associated with craniosynostosis. The molecular analysis of this model has been limited by the lack of molecular tools for use in rabbits. To understand the pathogenesis of craniosynostosis, the authors compared gene expression in perisutural tissues between wild-type and craniosynostotic rabbits using polymerase chain reaction suppression subtractive hybridization. METHODS: Suppression subtractive hybridization polymerase chain reaction was performed on RNA derived from pooled samples of calvariae from 10-day-old wild-type (n = 3) and craniosynostotic (n = 3) rabbits to obtain cDNA clones enriched in either wild-type tissues (underexpressed in craniosynostotic tissue) or craniosynostotic tissues (overexpressed in craniosynostotic compared with wild-type). RESULTS: Differential expression was identified for approximately 140 recovered cDNA clones up-regulated in craniosynostotic tissues and 130 recovered clones for wild-type tissues. Of these, four genes were confirmed by quantitative reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction as being overexpressed in craniosynostotic sutural tissue: β-globin (HBB), osteopontin (SPP1), osteonectin (SPARC), and cathepsin K (CTSK). Two genes were confirmed to be underexpressed in the craniosynostotic samples: collagen 3, alpha 1 (COL3A1) and ring finger protein 12 (RNF12). CONCLUSION: The differential expression of these gene products in our naturally occurring craniosynostotic model appears to be the result of differences in the normal bone formation/resorption pathway.
BACKGROUND: In the United States, the incidence of craniosynostosis (premature fusion of the sutures of the cranial vault) is one in 2000 to 3000 live births. The condition can cause increased intracranial pressure, severely altered head shape, and mental retardation. The authors have previously described a colony of rabbits with heritable coronal suture synostosis. This model has been instrumental in describing the postsurgical craniofacial growth associated with craniosynostosis. The molecular analysis of this model has been limited by the lack of molecular tools for use in rabbits. To understand the pathogenesis of craniosynostosis, the authors compared gene expression in perisutural tissues between wild-type and craniosynostotic rabbits using polymerase chain reaction suppression subtractive hybridization. METHODS: Suppression subtractive hybridization polymerase chain reaction was performed on RNA derived from pooled samples of calvariae from 10-day-old wild-type (n = 3) and craniosynostotic (n = 3) rabbits to obtain cDNA clones enriched in either wild-type tissues (underexpressed in craniosynostotic tissue) or craniosynostotic tissues (overexpressed in craniosynostotic compared with wild-type). RESULTS: Differential expression was identified for approximately 140 recovered cDNA clones up-regulated in craniosynostotic tissues and 130 recovered clones for wild-type tissues. Of these, four genes were confirmed by quantitative reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction as being overexpressed in craniosynostotic sutural tissue: β-globin (HBB), osteopontin (SPP1), osteonectin (SPARC), and cathepsin K (CTSK). Two genes were confirmed to be underexpressed in the craniosynostotic samples: collagen 3, alpha 1 (COL3A1) and ring finger protein 12 (RNF12). CONCLUSION: The differential expression of these gene products in our naturally occurring craniosynostotic model appears to be the result of differences in the normal bone formation/resorption pathway.
Authors: Derrick C Wan; Oliver O Aalami; Zhen Wang; Randall P Nacamuli; Florence Lorget; Rik Derynck; Michael T Longaker Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Date: 2006-09-15 Impact factor: 4.730
Authors: S Perez-Amodio; D C Jansen; T Schoenmaker; I M C Vogels; T Reinheckel; A R Hayman; T M Cox; P Saftig; W Beertsen; V Everts Journal: Calcif Tissue Int Date: 2006-10-10 Impact factor: 4.333
Authors: Dylan J Murray; Michael O Kelleher; A McGillivary; David Allcutt; Michael J Earley Journal: J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg Date: 2007-04-25 Impact factor: 2.740
Authors: Ines C Lin; Alison E Slemp; Catherine Hwang; Miguel Sena-Esteves; Hyun-Duck Nah; Richard E Kirschner Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Date: 2007-10 Impact factor: 4.730
Authors: Emily S Doherty; Felicitas Lacbawan; Donald W Hadley; Carmen Brewer; Christopher Zalewski; H Jeff Kim; Beth Solomon; Kenneth Rosenbaum; Demetrio L Domingo; Thomas C Hart; Brian P Brooks; Ladonna Immken; R Brian Lowry; Virginia Kimonis; Alan L Shanske; Fernanda Sarquis Jehee; Maria Rita Passos Bueno; Carol Knightly; Donna McDonald-McGinn; Elaine H Zackai; Maximilian Muenke Journal: Am J Med Genet A Date: 2007-12-15 Impact factor: 2.802
Authors: Michael O Kelleher; Dylan J Murray; Anne McGillivary; Mahmoud H Kamel; David Allcutt; Michael J Earley Journal: Childs Nerv Syst Date: 2007-06-14 Impact factor: 1.475
Authors: D Ricci; G Vasco; G Baranello; A Salerni; R Amante; G Tamburrini; A Dickmann; C Di Rocco; F Velardi; E Mercuri Journal: Dev Med Child Neurol Date: 2007-08 Impact factor: 5.449
Authors: Monica Grova; David D Lo; Daniel Montoro; Jeong S Hyun; Michael T Chung; Derrick C Wan; Michael T Longaker Journal: J Craniofac Surg Date: 2012-11 Impact factor: 1.046
Authors: James R Gilbert; Joseph E Losee; Mark P Mooney; James J Cray; Jennifer Gustafson; Michael L Cunningham; Gregory M Cooper Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-09-20 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Phillip H Gallo; James J Cray; Emily L Durham; Mark P Mooney; Gregory M Cooper; Sandeep Kathju Journal: Int J Genomics Date: 2013-05-08 Impact factor: 2.326