| Literature DB >> 32802043 |
Yusu Ni1, Diyan Chen1, Yi Jiang2, Danhong Qiu3, Wen Li4, Huawei Li1,5,6,7,8.
Abstract
Background: The precise mechanisms of nerve regeneration remain unclear. The potential of facial nerve regeneration and probable mechanisms involved following chronic facial nerve injury should be further studied.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32802043 PMCID: PMC7416273 DOI: 10.1155/2020/8884511
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neural Plast ISSN: 1687-5443 Impact factor: 3.599
Figure 1In Group I, GAP43 was expressed at a low level on the normal control side (a) and chronically axotomized side (b), but was higher in the facial nucleus at 12 w reaxotomy (d) compared with the control side (c).
Figure 2RT-PCR and western blot analysis of total RNA. GAP43 transcripts and GAP43 protein expression at 3, 5, 7, and 9 months after axotomy.
Figure 3Most of the region was filled with collagen fibers and perineuria appeared normal at 12 w (a). Transmission electron microscopy showed hardly any surviving axons were observed and perineuria appeared collapsed at 28 w (b).
Figure 4Facial nucleus double fluorescent-labeling laser scanning confocal fluorescence microscopy: red indicates sonic hedgehog-positive cells (a); green indicates GFAP-positive cells (b). GFAP-positive cells did not express sonic hedgehog. Panel (c) was the merger of panel (a) and panel (b). Panel (d) is the 3D image of confocal imaging (c).
Figure 5Facial nucleus double fluorescent-labeling laser scanning confocal fluorescence microscopy: green indicates GAP43-positive neurons (b); red indicates sonic hedgehog-positive cells (a). The GAP43-positive neurons were stronger expressing sonic hedgehog. Panel (c) was the merger of panel (a) and panel (b). Panel (d) is the 3D image of confocal imaging (c).
Figure 6Double fluorescent labeling. In the reinjury group (16 w), expression of GAP43 (b) and sonic hedgehog (d) was apparently higher in the reinjured side compared with the control side of the facial nucleus (a) and (c).