Hsin-Min Wang1, Sandra J Shultz2, Scott E Ross2, Robert A Henson3, David H Perrin4, Randy J Schmitz2. 1. Department of Sports, National Changhua University of Education, Changhua City, Taiwan. 2. Department of Kinesiology & Gateway MRI Center, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Greensboro, North Carolina. 3. Department of Educational Research Methodology, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Greensboro, North Carolina. 4. Department of Physical Therapy and Athletic Training, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Given the relatively high risk of contralateral anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury in patients with ACL reconstruction (ACLR), there is a need to understand intrinsic risk factors that may contribute to contralateral injury. HYPOTHESIS: The ACLR group would have smaller ACL volume and a narrower femoral notch width than healthy individuals after accounting for relevant anthropometrics. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3. METHODS: Magnetic resonance imaging data of the left knee were obtained from uninjured (N = 11) and unilateral ACL-reconstructed (N = 10) active, female, collegiate-level recreational athletes. ACL volume was obtained from T2-weighted images. Femoral notch width and notch width index were measured from T1-weighted images. Independent-samples t tests examined differences in all measures between healthy and ACLR participants. RESULTS: The ACLR group had a smaller notch width index (0.22 ± 0.02 vs 0.25 ± 0.01; P = 0.004; effect size, 1.41) and ACL volume (25.6 ± 4.0 vs 32.6 ± 8.2 mm3/(kg·m)-1; P = 0.025; effect size, 1.08) after normalizing by body size. CONCLUSION: Only after normalizing for relevant anthropometrics, the contralateral ACLR limb had smaller ACL size and narrower relative femoral notch size than healthy individuals. These findings suggest that risk factor studies of ACL size and femoral notch size should account for relevant body size when determining their association with contralateral ACL injury. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The present study shows that the method of the identified intrinsic risk factors for contralateral ACL injury could be used in future clinical screening settings.
BACKGROUND: Given the relatively high risk of contralateral anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury in patients with ACL reconstruction (ACLR), there is a need to understand intrinsic risk factors that may contribute to contralateral injury. HYPOTHESIS: The ACLR group would have smaller ACL volume and a narrower femoral notch width than healthy individuals after accounting for relevant anthropometrics. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3. METHODS: Magnetic resonance imaging data of the left knee were obtained from uninjured (N = 11) and unilateral ACL-reconstructed (N = 10) active, female, collegiate-level recreational athletes. ACL volume was obtained from T2-weighted images. Femoral notch width and notch width index were measured from T1-weighted images. Independent-samples t tests examined differences in all measures between healthy and ACLR participants. RESULTS: The ACLR group had a smaller notch width index (0.22 ± 0.02 vs 0.25 ± 0.01; P = 0.004; effect size, 1.41) and ACL volume (25.6 ± 4.0 vs 32.6 ± 8.2 mm3/(kg·m)-1; P = 0.025; effect size, 1.08) after normalizing by body size. CONCLUSION: Only after normalizing for relevant anthropometrics, the contralateral ACLR limb had smaller ACL size and narrower relative femoral notch size than healthy individuals. These findings suggest that risk factor studies of ACL size and femoral notch size should account for relevant body size when determining their association with contralateral ACL injury. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The present study shows that the method of the identified intrinsic risk factors for contralateral ACL injury could be used in future clinical screening settings.
Entities:
Keywords:
ACL volume; MRI; knee; notch width index
Authors: Rick W Wright; Warren R Dunn; Annunziato Amendola; Jack T Andrish; John Bergfeld; Christopher C Kaeding; Robert G Marx; Eric C McCarty; Richard D Parker; Michelle Wolcott; Brian R Wolf; Kurt P Spindler Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2007-04-23 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Paul A Yushkevich; Joseph Piven; Heather Cody Hazlett; Rachel Gimpel Smith; Sean Ho; James C Gee; Guido Gerig Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2006-03-20 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Darryl C Whitney; Daniel R Sturnick; Pamela M Vacek; Mike J DeSarno; Mack Gardner-Morse; Timothy W Tourville; Helen C Smith; James R Slauterbeck; Robert J Johnson; Sandra J Shultz; Javad Hashemi; Bruce D Beynnon Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2014-05-27 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Amelia J Wiggins; Ravi K Grandhi; Daniel K Schneider; Denver Stanfield; Kate E Webster; Gregory D Myer Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2016-01-15 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Ajit M W Chaudhari; Eric A Zelman; David C Flanigan; Christopher C Kaeding; Haikady N Nagaraja Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2009-03-23 Impact factor: 6.202