Background: The relationship between anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury and anatomical structures is still a topic of debate. Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare knee geometry in demographically matched ACL-injured and ACL-intact athletes. Methods: We conducted a case-control study comparing 2 groups, each consisting of 55 professional athletes (44 men and 11 women): 1 group with complete ACL tears (cases) and 1 group with intact ACLs (controls). The groups were compared using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in terms of intercondylar notch geometry, tibial plateau characteristics, and ACL volume. Results: Among cases and controls, we found the cases had lower notch width (20.24 ± 2.68 mm vs. 22.04 ± 2.56 mm, respectively) and notch width index (0.29 ± 0.03 vs. 0.31 ± 0.03, respectively). The mean ACL volume in the cases (1181.63 mm3 ± 326 mm3) was also lower than in controls (1352.61 mm3 ± 279.84 mm3). The parameters of tibial slope geometry were comparable between groups. In addition, women had lower ACL volume than men (1254 ± 310 mm3 vs. 890 ± 267 mm3, respectively) and higher medial posterior tibial slope (4.76 ± 2.6 vs. 6.63 ± 1.83, respectively). Among cases, women had narrower notch width than men (16.9 ± 2.42 mm vs. 21.08 ± 2.03 mm). However, notch width index was comparable between male (0.3 ± 0.02) and female (0.28 ± 0.03) cases. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that narrow notch width and low ACL volume may enhance the risk of ACL injury among athletes. There was no association found between posterior tibial slope and ACL injury between athletes with injured ACLs and controls. Further study is indicated.
Background: The relationship between anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury and anatomical structures is still a topic of debate. Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare knee geometry in demographically matched ACL-injured and ACL-intact athletes. Methods: We conducted a case-control study comparing 2 groups, each consisting of 55 professional athletes (44 men and 11 women): 1 group with complete ACL tears (cases) and 1 group with intact ACLs (controls). The groups were compared using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in terms of intercondylar notch geometry, tibial plateau characteristics, and ACL volume. Results: Among cases and controls, we found the cases had lower notch width (20.24 ± 2.68 mm vs. 22.04 ± 2.56 mm, respectively) and notch width index (0.29 ± 0.03 vs. 0.31 ± 0.03, respectively). The mean ACL volume in the cases (1181.63 mm3 ± 326 mm3) was also lower than in controls (1352.61 mm3 ± 279.84 mm3). The parameters of tibial slope geometry were comparable between groups. In addition, women had lower ACL volume than men (1254 ± 310 mm3 vs. 890 ± 267 mm3, respectively) and higher medial posterior tibial slope (4.76 ± 2.6 vs. 6.63 ± 1.83, respectively). Among cases, women had narrower notch width than men (16.9 ± 2.42 mm vs. 21.08 ± 2.03 mm). However, notch width index was comparable between male (0.3 ± 0.02) and female (0.28 ± 0.03) cases. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that narrow notch width and low ACL volume may enhance the risk of ACL injury among athletes. There was no association found between posterior tibial slope and ACL injury between athletes with injured ACLs and controls. Further study is indicated.
Authors: Mark D Tillman; Kendra R Smith; Jeffrey A Bauer; James H Cauraugh; Anthony B Falsetti; Judith L Pattishall Journal: Knee Date: 2002-02 Impact factor: 2.199
Authors: Sandra J Shultz; Randy J Schmitz; Anne Benjaminse; Malcolm Collins; Kevin Ford; Anthony S Kulas Journal: J Athl Train Date: 2015-09-04 Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: Douglas S Weinberg; Drew F K Williamson; Jeremy J Gebhart; Derrick M Knapik; James E Voos Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2016-10-01 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Stephen D Fening; Jeffrey Kovacic; Helen Kambic; Scott McLean; Jacob Scott; Anthony Miniaci Journal: J Knee Surg Date: 2008-07 Impact factor: 2.757
Authors: Michael S Todd; Steve Lalliss; E'Stephan Garcia; Thomas M DeBerardino; Kenneth L Cameron Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2009-09-08 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Ajit M W Chaudhari; Eric A Zelman; David C Flanigan; Christopher C Kaeding; Haikady N Nagaraja Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2009-03-23 Impact factor: 6.202