Literature DB >> 31520689

Effects of d-amphetamine and MK-801 on impulsive choice: Modulation by schedule of reinforcement and delay length.

Justin R Yates1, Haley A Day2, Karson E Evans2, Hephzibah O Igwe2, Joy L Kappesser2, Amber L Miller2, Christopher P Murray2, Brett T Torline2, Alexis L Ellis2, William L Stacy2.   

Abstract

Procedural modifications can modulate drug effects in delay discounting, such as signaling the delay to reinforcement and altering the order in which delays are presented. Although the schedule of reinforcement can alter the rate at which animals discount a reinforcer, research has not determined if animals trained on different schedules of reinforcement are differentially affected by pharmacological manipulations. Similarly, research has not determined if using different delays to reinforcement can modulate drug effects in delay discounting. Male Sprague Dawley rats (n = 36) were split into four groups and were trained in a delay-discounting procedure. The schedule of reinforcement (fixed ratio [FR] 1 vs. FR 10) and delays to reinforcement (0, 5, 10, 20, and 50 s vs. 0, 10, 30, 60, 100 s) were manipulated for each group. Following behavioral training, rats were treated with d-amphetamine (0, 0.25, 0.5, and 1.0 mg/kg) and MK-801 (0, 0.03, and 0.06 mg/kg). Results showed that amphetamine decreased impulsive choice when a FR 1 schedule was used, but only when the short delay sequence was used. Conversely, amphetamine decreased impulsive choice when a FR 10 schedule was used, but only when rats were trained on the long delay sequence. MK-801 decreased impulsive choice in rats trained on a FR 1 schedule, regardless of delay sequence, but did not alter choice in rats trained on a FR 10 schedule. These results show that schedule of reinforcement and delay length can modulate drug effects in delay discounting.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Amphetamine; Delay discounting; Delay length; Impulsive choice; MK-801; Schedule of reinforcement

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31520689      PMCID: PMC6905382          DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2019.112228

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Brain Res        ISSN: 0166-4328            Impact factor:   3.332


  46 in total

1.  Effects of Group I metabotropic glutamate receptor antagonists on sensitivity to reinforcer magnitude and delayed reinforcement in a delay-discounting task in rats: Contribution of delay presentation order.

Authors:  Justin R Yates; Katherine K Rogers; Benjamin T Gunkel; Nicholas A Prior; Mallory N Hughes; Sara M Sharpe; Hunter L Campbell; Anthony B Johnson; Margaret G Keller; Kerry A Breitenstein; Hansen N Shults
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 2.  Dissecting drug effects in preclinical models of impulsive choice: emphasis on glutamatergic compounds.

Authors:  Justin R Yates
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2018-01-06       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  Critical involvement of dopaminergic neurotransmission in impulsive decision making.

Authors:  Marcel M van Gaalen; Reinout van Koten; Anton N M Schoffelmeer; Louk J M J Vanderschuren
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2005-08-25       Impact factor: 13.382

4.  The pharmacology of impulsive behaviour in rats: the effects of drugs on response choice with varying delays of reinforcement.

Authors:  J L Evenden; C N Ryan
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  Differential effects of d-amphetamine on impulsive choice in spontaneously hypertensive and Wistar-Kyoto rats.

Authors:  Dennis J Hand; Andrew T Fox; Mark P Reilly
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.293

6.  The uncompetitive NMDA receptor antagonists ketamine and memantine preferentially increase the choice for a small, immediate reward in low-impulsive rats.

Authors:  Pietro Cottone; Attilio Iemolo; Aditi R Narayan; Jina Kwak; Duncan Momaney; Valentina Sabino
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2012-10-27       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  Dopaminergic modulation of impulsive decision making in the rat insular cortex.

Authors:  Tommy Pattij; Dustin Schetters; Anton N M Schoffelmeer
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2014-05-13       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Dissociable effects of mGluR5 allosteric modulation on distinct forms of impulsivity in rats: interaction with NMDA receptor antagonism.

Authors:  Sarah N Isherwood; Anton Pekcec; Janet R Nicholson; Trevor W Robbins; Jeffrey W Dalley
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2015-06-12       Impact factor: 4.530

9.  The effects of d-amphetamine, chlordiazepoxide, alpha-flupenthixol and behavioural manipulations on choice of signalled and unsignalled delayed reinforcement in rats.

Authors:  R N Cardinal; T W Robbins; B J Everitt
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.530

10.  The relationship between impulsive choice and impulsive action: a cross-species translational study.

Authors:  Nienke Broos; Lianne Schmaal; Joost Wiskerke; Lennard Kostelijk; Thomas Lam; Nicky Stoop; Lonneke Weierink; Jannemieke Ham; Eco J C de Geus; Anton N M Schoffelmeer; Wim van den Brink; Dick J Veltman; Taco J de Vries; Tommy Pattij; Anna E Goudriaan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-04       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  3 in total

1.  The Effects of Drug Treatments for ADHD in Measures of Cognitive Performance.

Authors:  Guy A Higgins; Leo B Silenieks
Journal:  Curr Top Behav Neurosci       Date:  2022

2.  Pair housing, but not using a controlled reinforcer frequency procedure, attenuates the modulatory effect of probability presentation order on amphetamine-induced changes in risky choice.

Authors:  Justin R Yates; Alexis L Ellis; Karson E Evans; Joy L Kappesser; Kadyn M Lilly; Prodiges Mbambu; Tanner G Sutphin
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Differential effects of glutamate N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonists on risky choice as assessed in the risky decision task.

Authors:  Justin R Yates; Matthew J Horchar; Alexis L Ellis; Joy L Kappesser; Prodiges Mbambu; Tanner G Sutphin; Destiny S Dehner; Hephzibah O Igwe; Makayla R Wright
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 4.530

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.