Literature DB >> 35606638

The Effects of Drug Treatments for ADHD in Measures of Cognitive Performance.

Guy A Higgins1,2, Leo B Silenieks3.   

Abstract

Based on core symptoms of inattention and deficient impulse control, and the identification of effective pharmacotherapies such as amphetamine (AMP; Adderall®), methylphenidate (MPH; Ritalin®), and atomoxetine (ATX; Strattera®), ADHD is a clinical condition which provides opportunity for translational research. Neuropsychological tests such as the 5-Choice and Continuous Performance Tasks, which measure aspects of attention and impulse control in animals and humans, provide scope for both forward (animal to human) and reverse (human to animal) translation. Rodent studies support pro-attentive effects of AMP and MPH and effectiveness in controlling some forms of impulsive behavior. In contrast, any pro-attentive effects of ATX appear to be less consistent, the most reliable effects of ATX are recorded in tests of impulsivity. These differences may account for AMP and MPH being recognized as first-line treatments for ADHD with a higher efficacy relative to ATX. DSM-5 classifies three "presentations" of ADHD: predominantly inattentive type (ADHD-I), predominantly hyperactive/impulsive type (ADHD-HI), or combined (ADHD-C). Presently, it is unclear whether AMP, MPH, or ATX has differential levels of efficacy across these presentation types. Nonetheless, these studies encourage confidence for the forward translation of NCEs in efforts to identify newer pharmacotherapies for ADHD.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.

Entities:  

Keywords:  5-Choice serial reaction time task; Attention; Continuous performance task; Impulsivity; Rat; Translation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35606638     DOI: 10.1007/7854_2022_341

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Top Behav Neurosci        ISSN: 1866-3370


  177 in total

1.  Relationship of plasma amphetamine levels to physiological, subjective, cognitive and biochemical measures in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Sheila J Asghar; Veronique A M I Tanay; Glen B Baker; Andy Greenshaw; Peter H Silverstone
Journal:  Hum Psychopharmacol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 1.672

2.  Early pharmacokinetics and clinical effects of oral D-amphetamine in normal subjects.

Authors:  B Angrist; J Corwin; B Bartlik; T Cooper
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 13.382

Review 3.  The cognitive neuroscience of response inhibition: relevance for genetic research in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

Authors:  Adam R Aron; Russell A Poldrack
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2004-12-23       Impact factor: 13.382

Review 4.  Reprint of "Problems with spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) as a model of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (AD/HD)".

Authors:  Brent Alsop
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2007-11-30       Impact factor: 2.390

5.  The effects of clinically relevant doses of amphetamine and methylphenidate on signal detection and DRL in rats.

Authors:  Matthew E Andrzejewski; Robert C Spencer; Rachel L Harris; Elizabeth C Feit; Brenda L McKee; Craig W Berridge
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2014-01-24       Impact factor: 5.250

Review 6.  Toward a new understanding of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder pathophysiology: an important role for prefrontal cortex dysfunction.

Authors:  Amy F T Arnsten
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 5.749

7.  Simultaneous blockade of dopamine and noradrenaline reuptake promotes disadvantageous decision making in a rat gambling task.

Authors:  Petra J J Baarendse; Catharine A Winstanley; Louk J M J Vanderschuren
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2012-09-12       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  Rats with different profiles of impulsive choice behavior exhibit differences in responses to caffeine and d-amphetamine and in medial prefrontal cortex 5-HT utilization.

Authors:  Alexandra Barbelivien; Erwan Billy; Christine Lazarus; Christian Kelche; Monique Majchrzak
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2007-09-21       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Dissociable effects of monoamine reuptake inhibitors on distinct forms of impulsive behavior in rats.

Authors:  Petra J J Baarendse; Louk J M J Vanderschuren
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2011-12-03       Impact factor: 4.530

10.  Guanfacine's mechanism of action in treating prefrontal cortical disorders: Successful translation across species.

Authors:  Amy F T Arnsten
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2020-10-17       Impact factor: 2.877

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.