Literature DB >> 32936321

Differential effects of glutamate N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonists on risky choice as assessed in the risky decision task.

Justin R Yates1, Matthew J Horchar2, Alexis L Ellis2, Joy L Kappesser3, Prodiges Mbambu2, Tanner G Sutphin2, Destiny S Dehner2, Hephzibah O Igwe2, Makayla R Wright2.   

Abstract

RATIONALE: Risky choice can be measured using the risky decision task (RDT). In the RDT, animals choose between a large, risky option that is paired with probabilistic foot shock and a small, safe option that is never paired with shock. To date, studies examining the neurochemical basis of decision-making in the RDT have focused primarily on the dopaminergic system but have not focused on the glutamatergic system, which has been implicated in risky decision-making.
OBJECTIVES: Because glutamate is known to play a critical role in decision-making, we wanted to determine the contribution of the glutamatergic system to performance in the RDT.
METHODS: In the experiment, 32 rats (16 male; 16 female) were tested in the RDT. The probability of receiving a foot shock increased across the session (ascending schedule) for half of the rats but decreased across the session (descending schedule) for half of the rats. Following training, rats received injections of the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor competitive antagonist CGS 19755 (0, 1.0, 2.5, 5.0 mg/kg; s.c.) and the GluN2B-selective antagonist Ro 63-1908 (0, 0.1, 0.3, 1.0 mg/kg; s.c.).
RESULTS: CGS 19755 (2.5 and 5.0 mg/kg) increased risky choice in males and females trained on the ascending schedule. Ro 63-1908 (1.0 mg/kg) decreased risky choice, but only in male rats trained on the ascending schedule.
CONCLUSIONS: Although NMDA receptor antagonists differentially alter risky choice in the RDT, the current results show that NMDA receptors are an important mediator of decision-making involving probabilistic delivery of positive punishment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  GluN2B subunit; Glutamate; NMDA receptor; Rat; Risky choice; Risky decision task

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32936321      PMCID: PMC7796939          DOI: 10.1007/s00213-020-05664-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)        ISSN: 0033-3158            Impact factor:   4.530


  54 in total

1.  Decision-making impairments in patients with pathological gambling.

Authors:  Matthias Brand; Elke Kalbe; Kirsten Labudda; Esther Fujiwara; Josef Kessler; Hans J Markowitsch
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2005-01-30       Impact factor: 3.222

2.  MK-801 inhibition of nicotinic acetylcholine receptor channels.

Authors:  M Amador; J A Dani
Journal:  Synapse       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 2.562

3.  The role of the nucleus accumbens in learned approach behavior diminishes with training.

Authors:  Veronica Dobrovitsky; Mark O West; Jon C Horvitz
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2019-08-19       Impact factor: 3.386

4.  An alternative approach to calculating Area-Under-the-Curve (AUC) in delay discounting research.

Authors:  Allison M Borges; Jinyi Kuang; Hannah Milhorn; Richard Yi
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Behavioral pharmacological profile of CGS 19755, a competitive antagonist at N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors.

Authors:  D A Bennett; P S Bernard; C L Amrick; D E Wilson; J M Liebman; A J Hutchison
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 4.030

6.  The uncompetitive NMDA receptor antagonists ketamine and memantine preferentially increase the choice for a small, immediate reward in low-impulsive rats.

Authors:  Pietro Cottone; Attilio Iemolo; Aditi R Narayan; Jina Kwak; Duncan Momaney; Valentina Sabino
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2012-10-27       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  MeCP2 Expression in a Rat Model of Risky Decision Making.

Authors:  Jay V Deng; Caitlin A Orsini; Kristy G Shimp; Barry Setlow
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2017-11-16       Impact factor: 3.590

8.  Impaired decision-making under risk in individuals with alcohol dependence.

Authors:  Damien Brevers; Antoine Bechara; Axel Cleeremans; Charles Kornreich; Paul Verbanck; Xavier Noël
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 3.455

9.  Dissociable contributions of the ventral hippocampus and orbitofrontal cortex to decision-making with a delayed or uncertain outcome.

Authors:  Andrew R Abela; Yogita Chudasama
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 3.386

10.  Effects of lesions of the nucleus accumbens core on choice between small certain rewards and large uncertain rewards in rats.

Authors:  Rudolf N Cardinal; Nathan J Howes
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2005-05-28       Impact factor: 3.288

View more
  3 in total

1.  Effects of NMDA receptor antagonists on behavioral economic indices of cocaine self-administration.

Authors:  Matthew J Horchar; Joy L Kappesser; Maria R Broderick; Makayla R Wright; Justin R Yates
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2022-02-12       Impact factor: 4.492

2.  The association between risky decision making and cocaine conditioned place preference is moderated by sex.

Authors:  Justin R Yates; Matthew J Horchar; Joy L Kappesser; Maria R Broderick; Alexis L Ellis; Makayla R Wright
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2021-09-24       Impact factor: 4.492

3.  Effects of the GluN2B-selective antagonist Ro 63-1908 on acquisition and expression of methamphetamine conditioned place preference in male and female rats.

Authors:  Justin R Yates; Hunter L Campbell; Lauren L Hawley; Matthew J Horchar; Joy L Kappesser; Makayla R Wright
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 4.852

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.