Literature DB >> 32417278

Pair housing, but not using a controlled reinforcer frequency procedure, attenuates the modulatory effect of probability presentation order on amphetamine-induced changes in risky choice.

Justin R Yates1, Alexis L Ellis2, Karson E Evans2, Joy L Kappesser3, Kadyn M Lilly2, Prodiges Mbambu2, Tanner G Sutphin2.   

Abstract

Probability discounting is often measured with independent schedules. Independent schedules have several limitations, such as confounding preference for one alternative with frequency of reward presentation and generating ceiling/floor effects at certain probabilities. To address this potential caveat, a controlled reinforcer frequency schedule can be used, in which the manipulandum that leads to reinforcement is pseudo-randomly determined before each trial. This schedule ensures subjects receive equal presentations of the small and large magnitude reinforcers across each block of trials. A total of 24 pair-housed and 11 individually housed female Sprague Dawley rats were tested in a controlled reinforcer frequency procedure. For half of the rats, the odds against (OA) receiving the large magnitude reinforcer increased across the session (ascending schedule); the OA decreased across the session for half of the rats (descending schedule). Following training, rats received treatments of amphetamine (AMPH; 0, 0.25, 0.5, 1.0 mg/kg; s.c.). For pair-housed rats, AMPH (0.5 mg/kg) increased risky choice, regardless of probability presentation order, whereas a higher dose of AMPH (1.0 mg/kg) decreased discriminability of reinforcer magnitude for rats trained on the descending schedule only. For individually housed rats, probability presentation order modulated the effects of AMPH on probability discounting, as AMPH (0.25 and 0.5 mg/kg) increased risky choice in rats trained on the ascending schedule but not on the descending schedule. These results show that pair-housing animals, but not using a controlled reinforcer frequency procedure, attenuates the modulatory effects of probability presentation order on drug effects on risky choice.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Amphetamine; Controlled reinforcer frequency; Housing; Probability discounting; Rat; Risky choice

Year:  2020        PMID: 32417278      PMCID: PMC7299282          DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2020.112669

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Brain Res        ISSN: 0166-4328            Impact factor:   3.332


  64 in total

1.  Preference reversal between impulsive and self-control choice.

Authors:  Emma Beeby; K Geoffrey White
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2013-02-25       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Dopamine D2 Receptor Signaling in the Nucleus Accumbens Comprises a Metabolic-Cognitive Brain Interface Regulating Metabolic Components of Glucose Reinforcement.

Authors:  Michael Michaelides; Michael L Miller; Jennifer A DiNieri; Juan L Gomez; Elizabeth Schwartz; Gabor Egervari; Gene Jack Wang; Charles V Mobbs; Nora D Volkow; Yasmin L Hurd
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2017-06-05       Impact factor: 7.853

3.  Sex, but not repeated maternal separation during the first postnatal week, influences novel object exploration and amphetamine sensitivity.

Authors:  E Hensleigh; L Smedley; L M Pritchard
Journal:  Dev Psychobiol       Date:  2010-09-30       Impact factor: 3.038

4.  Differential behavioral responses to chronic amphetamine in adult male and female rats exposed to postnatal cocaine treatment.

Authors:  S M Melnick; D L Dow-Edwards
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2001 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.533

5.  Effects of methylphenidate on sensitivity to reinforcement delay and to reinforcement amount in pigeons: Implications for impulsive choice.

Authors:  Raymond C Pitts; Craig W Cummings; Carol Cummings; Rebecca L Woodcock; Christine E Hughes
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 3.157

6.  Sex differences in a rat model of risky decision making.

Authors:  Caitlin A Orsini; Markie L Willis; Ryan J Gilbert; Jennifer L Bizon; Barry Setlow
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 1.912

7.  Prefrontal cortical contribution to risk-based decision making.

Authors:  Jennifer R St Onge; Stan B Floresco
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2009-11-05       Impact factor: 5.357

8.  Effects of N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor (NMDAr) uncompetitive antagonists in a delay discounting paradigm using a concurrent-chains procedure.

Authors:  Justin R Yates; Benjamin T Gunkel; Katherine K Rogers; Kerry A Breitenstein; Mallory N Hughes; Anthony B Johnson; Sara M Sharpe
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Effects of d-amphetamine and MK-801 on impulsive choice: Modulation by schedule of reinforcement and delay length.

Authors:  Justin R Yates; Haley A Day; Karson E Evans; Hephzibah O Igwe; Joy L Kappesser; Amber L Miller; Christopher P Murray; Brett T Torline; Alexis L Ellis; William L Stacy
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Differential roles of dopamine D1 and D2 receptors in the nucleus accumbens in attentional performance on the five-choice serial reaction time task.

Authors:  Marie-Astrid Pezze; Jeffrey W Dalley; Trevor W Robbins
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2006-04-12       Impact factor: 7.853

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.