Literature DB >> 31517033

Contemporary prevalence, trends, and outcomes of coronary chronic total occlusions in acute myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock.

Saraschandra Vallabhajosyula1, Abhiram Prasad1, Rajiv Gulati1, Gregory W Barsness1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There are limited data on the prevalence and outcomes of chronic total occlusions (CTO) of the coronary artery in acute myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock (AMI-CS) patients.
METHODS: Using the National Inpatient Sample, all admissions with AMI-CS that underwent diagnostic angiography between January 1, 2008, and December 31, 2014, were included. CTO, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), comorbidities and concomitant cardiac arrest was identified for all admissions. Outcomes of interest included temporal trends, in-hospital mortality, and resource utilization in cohorts with and without CTO.
RESULTS: In this 7-year period, 163,628 admissions with AMI-CS admissions met the inclusion criteria, with 68% being ST-elevation AMI-CS. CTO was noted in 27,343 (16.7%) admissions, with an increase in prevalence during the study period. The cohort with CTOs was more likely to be male and bearing private insurance. The CTO cohort had higher cardiovascular comorbidity, higher rates of cardiac arrest and higher use of PCI and mechanical circulatory support. The presence of a CTO was independently associated with higher in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio 1.20 [95% confidence interval 1.16-1.23]; p < 0.001). The cohort with CTO had lower resource utilization (hospital stay and hospitalization costs) but was discharged more frequently to other hospitals. The presence of a CTO was associated with higher in-hospital mortality in the sub-groups of ST-elevation AMI-CS (31.5% vs. 28.7%; p < 0.001) and non-ST-elevation AMI-CS (24.8% vs. 23.2%; p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort of AMI-CS admissions that underwent diagnostic angiography, the presence of a CTO identified a higher risk cohort that had higher in-hospital mortality.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiogenic shock; Chronic total occlusion; Complex coronary disease; Myocardial infarction; National Inpatient Sample; Outcomes research

Year:  2019        PMID: 31517033      PMCID: PMC6727101          DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2019.100414

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc        ISSN: 2352-9067


Introduction

Acute myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock (AMI-CS) continues to be associated with high mortality and morbidity in the contemporary era despite early percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) [[1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8]]. In patients with AMI-CS, diagnostic angiography frequently reveals multivessel disease, nearly a quarter of which are chronic total occlusions (CTO) [9]. Though PCI of the culprit artery in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) CS is recommended by both United States and European guidelines [[9], [10], [11], [12]], the role of multi-vessel PCI in this population is less certain. In a recent trial, however, Thiele et al. noted no clinical benefit to complete revascularization over culprit-only revascularization in AMI-CS [9]. This has led to the European guidelines recommending against multi-vessel PCI in this setting [9,10]. Multivessel PCI might result in decrease in myocardial ischemia and salvage of greater myocardium, however this needs to be balanced against the high contrast load. Furthermore, specifically for CTO-PCI, in addition to the high contrast load, the effort and radiation associated with revascularization, use of multiple approaches and need for multiple access sites, may not translate into an overall clinical benefit in AMI-CS [13]. Though multivessel PCI in AMI-CS has been studied previously in large national databases [14], there are limited data on the prevalence and outcomes of CTOs in AMI-CS in the contemporary era [15,16]. We sought to use a nationally-representative database to assess the presentation and outcomes of patients with CTO in AMI-CS. Given the increasingly acuity of illness and higher comorbidity burden associated with AMI-CS in the contemporary era [5], we hypothesized that there has been a steady increase in CTOs in this population.

Methods

The Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project - Nationwide/National Inpatient Sample (HCUP-NIS) is the largest all-payer database of hospitalized inpatients in the United States, containing discharge data from 20% non-federal hospitals. A retrospective cohort of admissions with a primary diagnosis of AMI (International Classification of Diseases 9 Clinical Modification [ICD-9CM] 410.x) with a secondary diagnosis of CS (ICD-9CM 785.51) that underwent diagnostic coronary angiography was identified between January 1, 2008, and December 31, 2014. Consistent with prior literature, presence of a coronary CTO was identified by ICD-9CM 414.2 [16]. Patient and hospital characteristics, comorbidities, and procedures were identified using previously validated methodologies (Supplementary Table 1) [[1], [2], [3],5,17]. The primary outcome was the contemporary prevalence and temporal trends of CTO in admissions with AMI-CS. Secondary outcomes included the comorbidity profile, in-hospital mortality, hospitalization costs and length of stay associated with CTOs. Though the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality has released the HCUP-NIS data till 2016, due to the change in coding practices from ICD-9CM to ICD-10CM in October 2015 we sought to restrict the data to 2014. The HCUP-NIS from 2015 and 2016 databases lack the Clinical Classification System for ICD-9CM codes used in the study. Furthermore, the ICD-10-CM codes lack extensive validation studies unlike the ICD-9CM codes and therefore need further evaluation prior to incorporation into temporal analyses [18,19].

Statistical analysis

As recommended by HCUP-NIS, survey procedures using discharge weights provided with HCUP-NIS database were used to generate national estimates. Using the trend weights provided by the HCUP-NIS, samples from 2008 to 2011 were re-weighted to adjust for the 2012 HCUP-NIS re-design [20]. In 2012, the HCUP-NIS was re-designed to sample 20% of the national patient-level sample as compared to 2000–2011 wherein it sampled 100% of the discharges from 20% of the hospitals [20]. Using trend weights available on the HCUP-NIS database, samples from 2000 to 2011 were retroactively re-weighted. The new sampling strategy is expected to result in more precise estimates than the previous HCUP-NIS design by reducing sampling error [21]. This methodology has been used by multiple prior studies spanning across year 2012 from the HCUP-NIS [[1], [2], [3], [4], [5]]. Odds ratio with 95% confidence interval was used to represent univariable and multivariable comparisons. Adjusted temporal trends were calculated using multivariable hierarchical logistic regression analysis incorporating age, sex, race, admission year, primary payer status, socio-economic stratum, hospital characteristics, Charlson Comorbidity Index, acute organ dysfunction, PCI, invasive hemodynamic monitoring, mechanical circulatory support and hemodialysis (referent year 2008). For the multivariate modeling, multivariable hierarchical logistic regression analysis with purposeful selection of statistically (p < 0.20 by univariate analysis) and clinically relevant variables was conducted. A priori defined sub-group analysis was performed in the cohorts with STEMI and non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). Two-tailed p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 25.0 (IBM Corp, Armonk NY).

Results

During this seven-year period, there were an estimated 163,628 admissions for AMI-CS that underwent diagnostic angiography, with 68% STEMIs and 32% NSTEMIs. Presence of a coronary CTO was noted in 27,343 (16.7%) admissions, with a higher prevalence in STEMI-CS (18%) vs. NSTEMI-CS (12.9%). The 7-year trends of unadjusted and adjusted prevalence of CTO showed an increase during the study period (Fig. 1A and B). The baseline characteristics between the cohort with and without CTOs are presented in Table 1. The CTO cohort was more likely to be male, bearing private insurance (27.9% vs. 26.3%; p < 0.001), but with comparable mean age. The cohort with CTO had greater cardiovascular comorbidities (hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, heart failure, smoking and peripheral arterial disease) than the cohort without CTOs (Table 1). The cohort with CTO had greater prevalence of cardiac arrest (23.6% vs. 21.2%) and higher use of PCI (74.8% vs. 68.2%) and mechanical circulatory support (61.5% vs. 58.4%) as compared to those without CTO (p < 0.001). Acute kidney injury rates were similar in the cohorts with and without CTO (39.6% vs. 39.8%; p = 0.24), however hemodialysis was used less often in the CTO cohort (3.7% vs. 4.2%; p < 0.001).
Fig. 1

Prevalence and in-hospital mortality with chronic total occlusions in AMI-CS.

Legend: 1A: unadjusted temporal trends in the prevalence of CTO in all AMI-CS, STEMI-CS and NSTEMI-CS; 1B: adjusted temporal trends of CTO in all AMI-CS, STEMI-CS and NSTEMI-CS (referent year 2008)*; 1C: unadjusted temporal trends in the in-hospital mortality in cohorts with and without CTO in AMI-CS; 1D: adjusted temporal trends of in-hospital mortality in cohorts with and without CTO in AMI-CS (referent year 2008)^; all p < 0.001 for trend.

*Adjusted for age, sex, race, race, weekend admission, primary payer, socio-economic status, hospital location and teaching status, hospital region, hospital bedsize, comorbidity.

^Adjusted for age, sex, race, race, weekend admission, primary payer, socio-economic status, hospital location and teaching status, hospital region, hospital bedsize, comorbidity, acute organ failure, cardiac arrest, percutaneous coronary intervention, invasive hemodynamic monitoring, mechanical circulatory support, invasive mechanical ventilation, hemodialysis.

Table 1

Baseline and hospital characteristics of CTO admissions with AMI-CS.

Baseline characteristicsCTO (N = 27,343)No CTO (N = 136,285)p
AMI typeST-elevation AMI73.367.0<0.001
Non-ST elevation AMI26.733.0
Age (years)66.3 ± 12.466.7 ± 12.6<0.001
Female sex30.435.7<0.001
RaceWhite67.967.50.13
Non-Whitea32.132.5
Primary payerMedicare53.055.7<0.001
Medicaid7.97.8
Others39.136.5
Quartile of median household income for zip code0–25th27.328.3<0.001
26th–50th26.927.0
51st–75th24.424.5
75th–100th21.420.2
Charlson Comorbidity Index0–328.827.90.001
4–649.350.5
≥721.921.6
ComorbiditiesHypertension63.960.0<0.001
Diabetes mellitus5.34.8<0.001
Hyperlipidemia50.046.7<0.001
Smoking38.033.5<0.001
Alcohol4.44.20.11
Peripheral arterial disease12.912.40.02
Heart failure53.452.70.03
Cancer7.57.60.62
Chronic kidney disease18.917.7<0.001
Liver disease0.40.50.001
Chronic pulmonary disease21.321.00.21
Stroke/transient ischemic attack6.87.00.29
Hemiplegia1.31.30.71
Connective tissue disease7.77.70.93
Hospital teaching status and locationRural5.25.30.32
Urban non-teaching38.038.4
Urban teaching56.856.3
Hospital bed-sizeSmall7.77.2<0.001
Medium24.420.9
Large67.971.9
Hospital regionNortheast13.116.2<0.001
Midwest24.323.8
South38.638.7
West24.021.2

Legend: represented as percentage or mean ± standard deviation; abbreviations: AMI: acute myocardial infarction; CS: cardiogenic shock; CTO: chronic total occlusion.

Black, Hispanic, Asian or Pacific Islander, Native American, Others.

Prevalence and in-hospital mortality with chronic total occlusions in AMI-CS. Legend: 1A: unadjusted temporal trends in the prevalence of CTO in all AMI-CS, STEMI-CS and NSTEMI-CS; 1B: adjusted temporal trends of CTO in all AMI-CS, STEMI-CS and NSTEMI-CS (referent year 2008)*; 1C: unadjusted temporal trends in the in-hospital mortality in cohorts with and without CTO in AMI-CS; 1D: adjusted temporal trends of in-hospital mortality in cohorts with and without CTO in AMI-CS (referent year 2008)^; all p < 0.001 for trend. *Adjusted for age, sex, race, race, weekend admission, primary payer, socio-economic status, hospital location and teaching status, hospital region, hospital bedsize, comorbidity. ^Adjusted for age, sex, race, race, weekend admission, primary payer, socio-economic status, hospital location and teaching status, hospital region, hospital bedsize, comorbidity, acute organ failure, cardiac arrest, percutaneous coronary intervention, invasive hemodynamic monitoring, mechanical circulatory support, invasive mechanical ventilation, hemodialysis. Baseline and hospital characteristics of CTO admissions with AMI-CS. Legend: represented as percentage or mean ± standard deviation; abbreviations: AMI: acute myocardial infarction; CS: cardiogenic shock; CTO: chronic total occlusion. Black, Hispanic, Asian or Pacific Islander, Native American, Others. Unadjusted in-hospital mortality was higher in the CTO cohort (29.7% vs. 26.9%; odds ratio 1.15 [95% confidence interval 1.12–1.19]; p < 0.001). The 7-year trends of unadjusted and adjusted in-hospital mortality are presented in Fig. 1C and D. The cohort with CTO had shorter hospital length of stay (9.1 ± 8.6 vs. 10.3 ± 10.4), lesser hospitalization costs (166,338 ± 155,435 vs. 174,166 ± 171,172) and were transferred more frequently to other hospitals (9.9% vs. 9.4%); all p < 0.001. In a multivariable hierarchical logistic regression analysis, the presence of a CTO was independently associated with higher in-hospital mortality (odds ratio 1.20 [95% confidence interval 1.16–1.23]; p < 0.001) (Supplementary Table 2). In a priori sub-group analysis, presence of a CTO was associated with higher in-hospital mortality in the STEMI-CS (31.5% vs. 28.7%; p < 0.001) and NSTEMI-CS (24.8% vs. 23.2%; p < 0.001) cohorts.

Discussion

In this nationally-representative study, CTOs were noted in nearly 17% of AMI-CS patients with a serial increase in prevalence during the study period. Admissions with STEMI had a higher prevalence of CTOs compared to NSTEMIs. The cohort with CTOs had higher severity of illness and greater use of PCI and mechanical circulatory support. The presence of a CTO was associated with higher unadjusted and adjusted in-hospital mortality, but lower resource utilization, which was consistent across sub-groups of STEMI and NSTEMI. In this study, nearly 17% of all diagnostic angiograms in AMI-CS noted CTOs in one or more vessels, which is consistent with contemporary literature that notes CTOs in 20–29% patients with AMI-CS [15,22]. Though there are established data on the prevalence of CTOs in STEMI-CS [15,22], there are limited data in patients presenting with NSTEMI-CS. In this study we note that the cohort with STEMI had higher prevalence of CTOs compared to NSTEMI. There was a serial increase in the incidence of CTOs between 2008 and 2014. Though higher patient comorbidity and presence of significant cardiac risk factors are potential contributors, it is possible that this increase may be reflective of increased awareness and recognition. It is possible that this higher prevalence is due to improvements in coding and billing practices. The higher preponderance of male sex and risk factors of hypertension, hyperlipidemia, peripheral arterial disease and smoking in this study are comparable to the sub-study on CTOs from the Intra-aortic Balloon Pump in Cardiogenic Shock II trial [15]. These findings suggest that CTO in this patient population may be a marker of advanced comorbidities and atherosclerotic burden. Consistent with prior literature, this study demonstrated CTOs to be associated with worse prognosis in the overall AMI cohort and in the individual STEMI and NSTEMI cohorts [15,22]. This may be hypothesized to be due to lower collateral blood flow and potentially higher myocardium at risk in CS. Furthermore, these patients are at a higher risk of ventricular arrhythmias and lower post-PCI left ventricular ejection fraction suggestive of a higher burden of cardiac morbidity during long-term follow-up [15,22]. Despite the known mortality and morbidity implications of a CTO, prior studies, including the CULPRIT-SHOCK (Culprit Lesion Only PCI versus Multivessel PCI in Cardiogenic Shock) trial have not shown a mortality benefit from CTO-PCI [9]. The lower rates of angiography and PCI in this study are consistent with prior real-world literature that reflects reluctance to perform angiography in higher risk cohorts despite robust guideline recommendations [12,23,24]. Angiography and PCI may frequently be deferred in patients with NSTEMI to evaluate for organ recovery or neurological function [25]. Further research in AMI-CS PCI, need careful delineation regarding immediate vs. staged PCI and approach to CTO-PCI in a staged manner, since the duration of this study was prior to the CULPRIT-SHOCK trial. Lastly, though the CTO cohort had shorter hospital stays and lower hospitalizations costs, they had higher rates of transfer. This is likely reflective of contemporary referral practice and highlights the need to develop centers of excellence for management of AMI-CS that present with complex coronary anatomy [6,26]. Since the HCUP-NIS does not follow patients across admissions, we are unable to ascertain this hypothesis. Further dedicated studies are needed to understand the resource utilization and inter-hospital transfers associated with complex AMI-CS including those with CTO. Lastly, there is a crucial need to develop multi-disciplinary teams to care for complex AMI-CS patients including but not limited to optimal timing of CTO-PCI, use of appropriate mechanical circulatory support and timing of cardiac and non-cardiac organ support [[5], [6], [7],[27], [28], [29], [30]]. This study has several limitations, some of which are inherent to the analysis of a large administrative database. The HCUP-NIS attempts to mitigate potential errors by using internal and external quality control measures. In this database, there is no reliable way to discern if coronary revascularization was performed in the CTO or non-CTO artery during the same or a subsequent encounter. Furthermore, we are unable to discern the timing, success and complications associated with CTO PCI vs. non-CTO vessel PCI. The ICD-9CM codes for AMI and CS have been previously validated that reduces the inherent errors in the study [3,5]. However, given the moderate sensitivity of the administrative code for CS, it is possible that less severe AMI-CS admissions were missed. Importantly, though the current research methodology has been used previously to evaluate CTO admissions in the NIS dataset, a validation study on this particular ICD-9CM code is lacking [16]. It is possible that greater awareness and recognition of CTOs may have resulted in ‘upcoding’ that could have influenced the temporal trends. However, the overall frequency of CTOs in this study is consistent with prior data, making this less likely [15,22]. Lack of imaging data and extended follow-up preclude assessment of the prognostic benefit of CTO revascularization in patients with AMI-CS [9,15]. The additional burden of out-of-hospital costs and re-admissions was not captured in this single admission database.

Conclusions

In this large cohort of nationally representative AMI-CS admissions undergoing diagnostic angiography over 7-years, we noted a steady increase in the prevalence of CTOs. Presence of a CTO identified patients at higher risk for in-hospital mortality in admissions with AMI-CS. Given the paucity of data in this field, further dedicated research is needed to aid in optimizing clinical outcomes for this high-risk cohort.

Abbreviations

acute myocardial infarction cardiogenic shock chronic total occlusion Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project International Classification of Disease-9 Clinical Modification National/Nationwide Inpatient Sample non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction percutaneous coronary intervention ST-elevation myocardial infarction

Sources of funding

None.

Declaration of competing interest

None.
  29 in total

1.  Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases.

Authors:  R A Deyo; D C Cherkin; M A Ciol
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 6.437

2.  With Great Power Comes Great Responsibility: Big Data Research From the National Inpatient Sample.

Authors:  Rohan Khera; Harlan M Krumholz
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2017-07

3.  The impact of multivessel disease with and without a co-existing chronic total occlusion on short- and long-term mortality in ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients with and without cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  Loes P Hoebers; Marije M Vis; Bimmer E Claessen; René J van der Schaaf; Wouter J Kikkert; Jan Baan; Robbert J de Winter; Jan J Piek; Jan G P Tijssen; George D Dangas; José P S Henriques
Journal:  Eur J Heart Fail       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 15.534

4.  2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Patrick T O'Gara; Frederick G Kushner; Deborah D Ascheim; Donald E Casey; Mina K Chung; James A de Lemos; Steven M Ettinger; James C Fang; Francis M Fesmire; Barry A Franklin; Christopher B Granger; Harlan M Krumholz; Jane A Linderbaum; David A Morrow; L Kristin Newby; Joseph P Ornato; Narith Ou; Martha J Radford; Jacqueline E Tamis-Holland; Carl L Tommaso; Cynthia M Tracy; Y Joseph Woo; David X Zhao
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2012-12-17       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 5.  Contemporary Management of Cardiogenic Shock: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Sean van Diepen; Jason N Katz; Nancy M Albert; Timothy D Henry; Alice K Jacobs; Navin K Kapur; Ahmet Kilic; Venu Menon; E Magnus Ohman; Nancy K Sweitzer; Holger Thiele; Jeffrey B Washam; Mauricio G Cohen
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Regional variation in cardiac catheterization appropriateness and baseline risk after acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Dennis T Ko; Yongfei Wang; David A Alter; Jeptha P Curtis; Saif S Rathore; Therese A Stukel; Fredrick A Masoudi; Joseph S Ross; JoAnne M Foody; Harlan M Krumholz
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2008-02-19       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  Temporal Trends and Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Interventions for Cardiogenic Shock in the Setting of Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Report From the CathPCI Registry.

Authors:  Siddharth A Wayangankar; Sripal Bangalore; Lisa A McCoy; Hani Jneid; Faisal Latif; Wassef Karrowni; Konstantinos Charitakis; Dmitriy N Feldman; Habib A Dakik; Laura Mauri; Eric D Peterson; John Messenger; Mathew Roe; Debabrata Mukherjee; Andrew Klein
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 11.195

8.  Trends in Coronary Angiography, Revascularization, and Outcomes of Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

Authors:  Dhaval Kolte; Sahil Khera; Kaustubh C Dabhadkar; Shikhar Agarwal; Wilbert S Aronow; Robert Timmermans; Diwakar Jain; Howard A Cooper; William H Frishman; Venu Menon; Deepak L Bhatt; J Dawn Abbott; Gregg C Fonarow; Julio A Panza
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 2.778

9.  Positive predictive value of International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision, diagnosis codes for cardiogenic, hypovolemic, and septic shock in the Danish National Patient Registry.

Authors:  Marie Dam Lauridsen; Henrik Gammelager; Morten Schmidt; Henrik Nielsen; Christian Fynbo Christiansen
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 4.615

10.  Validation and optimisation of an ICD-10-coded case definition for sepsis using administrative health data.

Authors:  Rachel J Jolley; Hude Quan; Nathalie Jetté; Keri Jo Sawka; Lucy Diep; Jade Goliath; Derek J Roberts; Bryan G Yipp; Christopher J Doig
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 2.692

View more
  18 in total

1.  Regional Variation in the Management and Outcomes of Acute Myocardial Infarction With Cardiogenic Shock in the United States.

Authors:  Saraschandra Vallabhajosyula; Sri Harsha Patlolla; Shannon M Dunlay; Abhiram Prasad; Malcolm R Bell; Allan S Jaffe; Bernard J Gersh; Charanjit S Rihal; David R Holmes; Gregory W Barsness
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 8.790

2.  Influence of primary payer status on non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: 18-year retrospective cohort national temporal trends, management and outcomes.

Authors:  Saraschandra Vallabhajosyula; Viral K Desai; Pranathi R Sundaragiri; Wisit Cheungpasitporn; Rajkumar Doshi; Vikas Singh; Allan S Jaffe; Amir Lerman; Gregory W Barsness
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-07

3.  Sex and Gender Disparities in the Management and Outcomes of Acute Myocardial Infarction-Cardiogenic Shock in Older Adults.

Authors:  Saraschandra Vallabhajosyula; Saarwaani Vallabhajosyula; Shannon M Dunlay; Sharonne N Hayes; Patricia J M Best; Jorge A Brenes-Salazar; Amir Lerman; Bernard J Gersh; Allan S Jaffe; Malcolm R Bell; David R Holmes; Gregory W Barsness
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 7.616

4.  Sex Disparities in the Management and Outcomes of Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction in the Young.

Authors:  Saraschandra Vallabhajosyula; Lina Ya'Qoub; Mandeep Singh; Malcolm R Bell; Rajiv Gulati; Wisit Cheungpasitporn; Pranathi R Sundaragiri; Virginia M Miller; Allan S Jaffe; Bernard J Gersh; David R Holmes; Gregory W Barsness
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2020-09-29       Impact factor: 8.790

5.  Burden of Arrhythmias in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock.

Authors:  Saraschandra Vallabhajosyula; Sri Harsha Patlolla; Dhiran Verghese; Lina Ya'Qoub; Vinayak Kumar; Anna V Subramaniam; Wisit Cheungpasitporn; Pranathi R Sundaragiri; Peter A Noseworthy; Siva K Mulpuru; Malcolm R Bell; Bernard J Gersh; Abhishek J Deshmukh
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2020-04-06       Impact factor: 2.778

6.  Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Use in Acute Myocardial Infarction in the United States, 2000 to 2014.

Authors:  Saraschandra Vallabhajosyula; Abhiram Prasad; Malcolm R Bell; Gurpreet S Sandhu; Mackram F Eleid; Shannon M Dunlay; Gregory J Schears; John M Stulak; Mandeep Singh; Bernard J Gersh; Allan S Jaffe; David R Holmes; Charanjit S Rihal; Gregory W Barsness
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2019-12-12       Impact factor: 8.790

7.  Both surgical and percutaneous revascularization improve prognosis in patients with a coronary chronic total occlusion (CTO) irrespective of collateral robustness.

Authors:  Usaid K Allahwala; Hosen Kiat; Avedis Ekmejian; Nadeem Mughal; Levi Bassin; Michael Ward; James C Weaver; Ravinay Bhindi
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 2.037

8.  Fibrinolysis vs. primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  Saraschandra Vallabhajosyula; Dhiran Verghese; Malcolm R Bell; Dennis H Murphree; Wisit Cheungpasitporn; Paul Elliott Miller; Shannon M Dunlay; Abhiram Prasad; Gurpreet S Sandhu; Rajiv Gulati; Mandeep Singh; Amir Lerman; Bernard J Gersh; David R Holmes; Gregory W Barsness
Journal:  ESC Heart Fail       Date:  2021-03-11

9.  Reporting of sex as a variable in cardiovascular studies using cultured cells: A systematic review.

Authors:  Saraschandra Vallabhajosyula; Shiva P Ponamgi; Sanskriti Shrivastava; Pranathi R Sundaragiri; Virginia M Miller
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Temporal trends, predictors, and outcomes of acute kidney injury and hemodialysis use in acute myocardial infarction-related cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  Saraschandra Vallabhajosyula; Shannon M Dunlay; Gregory W Barsness; Saarwaani Vallabhajosyula; Shashaank Vallabhajosyula; Pranathi R Sundaragiri; Bernard J Gersh; Allan S Jaffe; Kianoush Kashani
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.