Literature DB >> 32988218

Sex Disparities in the Management and Outcomes of Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction in the Young.

Saraschandra Vallabhajosyula1,2,3,4, Lina Ya'Qoub5, Mandeep Singh1, Malcolm R Bell1, Rajiv Gulati1, Wisit Cheungpasitporn6, Pranathi R Sundaragiri7, Virginia M Miller8,9, Allan S Jaffe1, Bernard J Gersh1, David R Holmes1, Gregory W Barsness1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There are limited data on how sex influences the outcomes of acute myocardial infarction-cardiogenic shock (AMI-CS) in young adults.
METHODS: A retrospective cohort of AMI-CS admissions aged 18 to 55 years, during 2000 to 2017, was identified using the National Inpatient Sample. Use of coronary angiography, percutaneous coronary intervention, mechanical circulatory support and noncardiac interventions was identified. Outcomes of interest included in-hospital mortality, use of cardiac interventions, hospitalization costs, and length of stay.
RESULTS: A total 90 648 AMI-CS admissions ≤55 years of age were included, of which 26% were women. Higher rates of CS were noted in men (2.2% in 2000 to 4.8% in 2017) compared with women (2.6% in 2000 to 4.0% in 2017; P<0.001). Compared with men, women with AMI-CS were more frequently of Black race, from a lower socioeconomic status, with higher comorbidity, and admitted to rural and small hospitals (all P<0.001). Women had lower rates of ST-segment elevation presentation (73.0% versus 78.7%), acute noncardiac organ failure, cardiac arrest (34.3% versus 35.7%), and received less-frequent coronary angiography (78.3% versus 81.4%), early coronary angiography (49.2% versus 54.1%), percutaneous coronary intervention (59.2% versus 64.0%), and mechanical circulatory support (50.3% versus 59.2%; all P<0.001). Female sex was an independent predictor of in-hospital mortality (23.0% versus 21.7%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.11 [95% CI, 1.07-1.16]; P<0.001). Women had lower hospitalization costs ($156 372±$198 452 versus $167 669±$208 577; P<0.001) but comparable lengths of stay compared with men.
CONCLUSIONS: In young AMI-CS admissions, women are treated less aggressively and experience higher in-hospital mortality than men.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adult; female; odds ratio; shock, cardiogenic; young adult

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32988218      PMCID: PMC7578068          DOI: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.120.007154

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Heart Fail        ISSN: 1941-3289            Impact factor:   8.790


  46 in total

1.  Trends, Predictors, and Outcomes of Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support for Postcardiac Surgery Cardiogenic Shock.

Authors:  Saraschandra Vallabhajosyula; Shilpkumar Arora; Ankit Sakhuja; Sopan Lahewala; Varun Kumar; Ghanshyam P S Shantha; Alexander C Egbe; John M Stulak; Bernard J Gersh; Rajiv Gulati; Charanjit S Rihal; Abhiram Prasad; Abhishek J Deshmukh
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2018-11-06       Impact factor: 2.778

2.  Cardiac Arrest Definition Using Administrative Codes and Outcomes in Acute Myocardial Infarction.

Authors:  Saraschandra Vallabhajosyula; Jacob C Jentzer; Chad J Zack
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 7.616

3.  Early vs. delayed in-hospital cardiac arrest complicating ST-elevation myocardial infarction receiving primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Saraschandra Vallabhajosyula; Saarwaani Vallabhajosyula; Malcolm R Bell; Abhiram Prasad; Mandeep Singh; Roger D White; Allan S Jaffe; David R Holmes; Jacob C Jentzer
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 5.262

4.  Regional Variation in the Management and Outcomes of Acute Myocardial Infarction With Cardiogenic Shock in the United States.

Authors:  Saraschandra Vallabhajosyula; Sri Harsha Patlolla; Shannon M Dunlay; Abhiram Prasad; Malcolm R Bell; Allan S Jaffe; Bernard J Gersh; Charanjit S Rihal; David R Holmes; Gregory W Barsness
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 8.790

5.  Intravascular ultrasound, optical coherence tomography, and fractional flow reserve use in acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Saraschandra Vallabhajosyula; Stephanie C El Hajj; Malcolm R Bell; Abhiram Prasad; Amir Lerman; Charanjit S Rihal; David R Holmes; Gregory W Barsness
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 6.  Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation With Concomitant Impella Versus Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Cardiogenic Shock.

Authors:  Saraschandra Vallabhajosyula; John C O'Horo; Phanindra Antharam; Sindhura Ananthaneni; Saarwaani Vallabhajosyula; John M Stulak; Shannon M Dunlay; David R Holmes; Gregory W Barsness
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 2.872

7.  Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Use in Acute Myocardial Infarction in the United States, 2000 to 2014.

Authors:  Saraschandra Vallabhajosyula; Abhiram Prasad; Malcolm R Bell; Gurpreet S Sandhu; Mackram F Eleid; Shannon M Dunlay; Gregory J Schears; John M Stulak; Mandeep Singh; Bernard J Gersh; Allan S Jaffe; David R Holmes; Charanjit S Rihal; Gregory W Barsness
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2019-12-12       Impact factor: 8.790

8.  Identification of acute myocardial infarction from electronic healthcare records using different disease coding systems: a validation study in three European countries.

Authors:  Preciosa M Coloma; Vera E Valkhoff; Giampiero Mazzaglia; Malene Schou Nielsson; Lars Pedersen; Mariam Molokhia; Mees Mosseveld; Paolo Morabito; Martijn J Schuemie; Johan van der Lei; Miriam Sturkenboom; Gianluca Trifirò
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-06-20       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Sex Differences in Timeliness of Reperfusion in Young Patients With ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction by Initial Electrocardiographic Characteristics.

Authors:  Aakriti Gupta; Jose A Barrabes; Kelly Strait; Hector Bueno; Andreu Porta-Sánchez; J Gabriel Acosta-Vélez; Rosa-Maria Lidón; Erica Spatz; Mary Geda; Rachel P Dreyer; Nancy Lorenze; Judith Lichtman; Gail D'Onofrio; Harlan M Krumholz
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 5.501

10.  Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support for Refractory Cardiogenic Shock Before Left Ventricular Assist Device Surgery.

Authors:  Saraschandra Vallabhajosyula; Shilpkumar Arora; Sopan Lahewala; Varun Kumar; Ghanshyam P S Shantha; Jacob C Jentzer; John M Stulak; Bernard J Gersh; Rajiv Gulati; Charanjit S Rihal; Abhiram Prasad; Abhishek J Deshmukh
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 5.501

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  A Clinical Update on Vasoactive Medication in the Management of Cardiogenic Shock.

Authors:  Aditi Shankar; Gayathri Gurumurthy; Lakshmi Sridharan; Divya Gupta; William J Nicholson; Wissam A Jaber; Saraschandra Vallabhajosyula
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Cardiol       Date:  2022-02-07

2.  Sex and Race Differences in the Evaluation and Treatment of Young Adults Presenting to the Emergency Department With Chest Pain.

Authors:  Darcy Banco; Jerway Chang; Nina Talmor; Priya Wadhera; Amrita Mukhopadhyay; Xinlin Lu; Siyuan Dong; Yukun Lu; Rebecca A Betensky; Saul Blecker; Basmah Safdar; Harmony R Reynolds
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 6.106

3.  Gender Differences in Cardiogenic Shock Patients: Clinical Features, Risk Prediction, and Outcomes in a Hub Center.

Authors:  Sara Lozano-Jiménez; Reyes Iranzo-Valero; Javier Segovia-Cubero; Manuel Gómez-Bueno; Mercedes Rivas-Lasarte; Cristina Mitroi; Juan Manuel Escudier-Villa; Juan Francisco Oteo-Dominguez; Jose María Vieitez-Florez; Susana Villar-García; Francisco José Hernández-Pérez
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-07-13

Review 4.  Sex differences in acute cardiovascular care: a review and needs assessment.

Authors:  Saraschandra Vallabhajosyula; Dhiran Verghese; Viral K Desai; Pranathi R Sundaragiri; Virginia M Miller
Journal:  Cardiovasc Res       Date:  2022-02-21       Impact factor: 10.787

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.