Literature DB >> 32861335

Sex and Gender Disparities in the Management and Outcomes of Acute Myocardial Infarction-Cardiogenic Shock in Older Adults.

Saraschandra Vallabhajosyula1, Saarwaani Vallabhajosyula2, Shannon M Dunlay3, Sharonne N Hayes2, Patricia J M Best2, Jorge A Brenes-Salazar4, Amir Lerman2, Bernard J Gersh2, Allan S Jaffe5, Malcolm R Bell2, David R Holmes2, Gregory W Barsness2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate outcomes by sex in older adults with cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction (AMI-CS).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort of older (≥75 years) AMI-CS admissions during January 1, 2000, to December 31, 2014, was identified using the National Inpatient Sample. Interhospital transfers were excluded. Use of angiography, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), mechanical circulatory support (MCS), and noncardiac interventions was identified. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality stratified by sex, and secondary outcomes included temporal trends of prevalence, in-hospital mortality, use of cardiac and noncardiac interventions, hospitalization costs, and length of stay.
RESULTS: In this 15-year period, there were 134,501 AMI-CS admissions 75 years or older, of whom 51.5% (n=69,220) were women. Women were on average older, were more often Hispanic or nonwhite race, and had lower comorbidity, acute organ failure, and concomitant cardiac arrest. Compared with older men (n=65,281), older women (n=69,220) had lower use of coronary angiography (55.4% [n=35,905] vs 49.2% [n=33,918]), PCI (36.3% [n=23,501] vs 34.4% [n=23,535]), MCS (34.3% [n=22,391] vs 27.2% [n=18,689]), mechanical ventilation, and hemodialysis (all P<.001). Female sex was an independent predictor of higher in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.02-1.08; P<.001) and more frequent discharges to a skilled nursing facility. In subgroup analyses of ethnicity, presence of cardiac arrest, and those receiving PCI and MCS, female sex remained an independent predictor of increased mortality.
CONCLUSION: Female sex is an independent predictor of worse in-hospital outcomes in older adults with AMI-CS in the United States.
Copyright © 2020 Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32861335      PMCID: PMC7582223          DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2020.01.043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc        ISSN: 0025-6196            Impact factor:   7.616


  57 in total

1.  Hospital-Level Disparities in the Outcomes of Acute Myocardial Infarction With Cardiogenic Shock.

Authors:  Saraschandra Vallabhajosyula; Shannon M Dunlay; Gregory W Barsness; Charanjit S Rihal; David R Holmes; Abhiram Prasad
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2019-05-28       Impact factor: 2.778

2.  Adherence to Methodological Standards in Research Using the National Inpatient Sample.

Authors:  Rohan Khera; Suveen Angraal; Tyler Couch; John W Welsh; Brahmajee K Nallamothu; Saket Girotra; Paul S Chan; Harlan M Krumholz
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Trends, Predictors, and Outcomes of Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support for Postcardiac Surgery Cardiogenic Shock.

Authors:  Saraschandra Vallabhajosyula; Shilpkumar Arora; Ankit Sakhuja; Sopan Lahewala; Varun Kumar; Ghanshyam P S Shantha; Alexander C Egbe; John M Stulak; Bernard J Gersh; Rajiv Gulati; Charanjit S Rihal; Abhiram Prasad; Abhishek J Deshmukh
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2018-11-06       Impact factor: 2.778

4.  Delays in Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients Presenting With Cardiogenic Shock.

Authors:  Ajar Kochar; Hussein R Al-Khalidi; Steen M Hansen; Jay S Shavadia; Mayme L Roettig; Christopher B Fordyce; Shannon Doerfler; Bernard J Gersh; Timothy D Henry; Peter B Berger; James G Jollis; Christopher B Granger
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2018-09-24       Impact factor: 11.195

5.  Evaluation of care and surveillance of cardiovascular disease: can we trust medico-administrative hospital data?

Authors:  Laurie Lambert; Claudia Blais; Denis Hamel; Kevin Brown; Stéphane Rinfret; Raymond Cartier; Maude Giguère; Céline Carroll; Christiane Beauchamp; Peter Bogaty
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2012-01-09       Impact factor: 5.223

6.  Sex differences in the management and outcomes of Ontario patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Husam M Abdel-Qadir; Joan Ivanov; Peter C Austin; Jack V Tu; Vladimír Džavík
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 5.223

7.  Identification of acute myocardial infarction from electronic healthcare records using different disease coding systems: a validation study in three European countries.

Authors:  Preciosa M Coloma; Vera E Valkhoff; Giampiero Mazzaglia; Malene Schou Nielsson; Lars Pedersen; Mariam Molokhia; Mees Mosseveld; Paolo Morabito; Martijn J Schuemie; Johan van der Lei; Miriam Sturkenboom; Gianluca Trifirò
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-06-20       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Age- and Gender-related Disparities in Primary Percutaneous Coronary Interventions for Acute ST-segment elevation Myocardial Infarction.

Authors:  Thomas Pilgrim; Dik Heg; Kali Tal; Paul Erne; Dragana Radovanovic; Stephan Windecker; Peter Jüni
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support for Refractory Cardiogenic Shock Before Left Ventricular Assist Device Surgery.

Authors:  Saraschandra Vallabhajosyula; Shilpkumar Arora; Sopan Lahewala; Varun Kumar; Ghanshyam P S Shantha; Jacob C Jentzer; John M Stulak; Bernard J Gersh; Rajiv Gulati; Charanjit S Rihal; Abhiram Prasad; Abhishek J Deshmukh
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 5.501

10.  Utilization of Palliative Care for Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction: A 15-Year National Perspective on Trends, Disparities, Predictors, and Outcomes.

Authors:  Saraschandra Vallabhajosyula; Abhiram Prasad; Shannon M Dunlay; Dennis H Murphree; Cory Ingram; Paul S Mueller; Bernard J Gersh; David R Holmes; Gregory W Barsness
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2019-07-18       Impact factor: 5.501

View more
  6 in total

1.  Sex Disparities in the Management and Outcomes of Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction in the Young.

Authors:  Saraschandra Vallabhajosyula; Lina Ya'Qoub; Mandeep Singh; Malcolm R Bell; Rajiv Gulati; Wisit Cheungpasitporn; Pranathi R Sundaragiri; Virginia M Miller; Allan S Jaffe; Bernard J Gersh; David R Holmes; Gregory W Barsness
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2020-09-29       Impact factor: 8.790

2.  Influence of primary payer status on the management and outcomes of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in the United States.

Authors:  Saraschandra Vallabhajosyula; Vinayak Kumar; Pranathi R Sundaragiri; Wisit Cheungpasitporn; Malcolm R Bell; Mandeep Singh; Allan S Jaffe; Gregory W Barsness
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-12-18       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  A Clinical Update on Vasoactive Medication in the Management of Cardiogenic Shock.

Authors:  Aditi Shankar; Gayathri Gurumurthy; Lakshmi Sridharan; Divya Gupta; William J Nicholson; Wissam A Jaber; Saraschandra Vallabhajosyula
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Cardiol       Date:  2022-02-07

4.  Sex Differences in Characteristics, Treatments, and In-hospital Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Coronary Angiography or Intervention.

Authors:  Shi-Qun Chen; Jin Liu; Yang Zhou; Zhi-Dong Huang; Yun Xie; Hao-Zhang Huang; Xiao-Ming Yan; Yong-Yi Xie; Peng-Fei Hao; Yan Liang; Shao-Hong Dong; Xiao-Yu Huang; Li-Ling Chen; Ning Tan; Yong Liu; Ji-Yan Chen
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-04-29

5.  Epidemiology of Geographic Disparities of Myocardial Infarction Among Older Adults in the United States: Analysis of 2000-2017 Medicare Data.

Authors:  Bin Yu; Igor Akushevich; Arseniy P Yashkin; Julia Kravchenko
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2021-09-09

Review 6.  Sex differences in acute cardiovascular care: a review and needs assessment.

Authors:  Saraschandra Vallabhajosyula; Dhiran Verghese; Viral K Desai; Pranathi R Sundaragiri; Virginia M Miller
Journal:  Cardiovasc Res       Date:  2022-02-21       Impact factor: 10.787

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.