Literature DB >> 31507273

National Trends in the Adoption of Pharmacy Curriculum Outcomes Assessment for Student Assessment and Remediation.

Justine Gortney1, Michael J Rudolph2, Jill M Augustine3, Julie M Sease4, Brenda Bray5, Nina Pavuluri6, Siu Fun Wong7.   

Abstract

Objective. To determine and describe the current uses of the Pharmacy Curriculum Outcomes Assessment (PCOA) by US schools and colleges of pharmacy. Methods. Assessment professionals from 135 US schools and colleges of pharmacy were invited to complete a 38-item electronic survey. Survey items were designed to investigate common uses of the PCOA, cut points, and "stakes" assigned to the PCOA, identification of at-risk students, and remediation approaches. Results. The school response rate was 68%. The most common uses of the PCOA included curricular assessment (76%), individual student performance assessment (74%), and cohort performance assessment (71%). The PCOA was most frequently administered to third-year pharmacy (P3) students. The approach for assigning "stakes" to PCOA performance varied among programs depending on the student's professional year in the curriculum. Programs used a variety of approaches to establish the benchmark (or cut point) for PCOA performance. Remediation for at risk students was required by less than 25% of programs. Remediation was most commonly required for P3 students (22%). Conclusion. Survey results indicate wide variability between programs regarding PCOA cut points (benchmarks), stakes, and remediation approaches. In the future, it will be important for pharmacy educators to identify and study best practices for use of PCOA within student assessment and remediation plans.

Keywords:  PCOA; high-stakes assessment; low-stakes assessment; remediation; student progression

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31507273      PMCID: PMC6718485          DOI: 10.5688/ajpe6796

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ        ISSN: 0002-9459            Impact factor:   2.047


  16 in total

1.  Development of a reliable, valid annual skills mastery assessment examination.

Authors:  Gregory L Alston; Bryan L Love
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 2.047

2.  Curricular progress assessments: the MileMarker.

Authors:  Julianna E Szilagyi
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 2.047

3.  A progress assessment to evaluate pharmacy students' knowledge prior to beginning advanced pharmacy practice experiences.

Authors:  Katherine A Kelley; Stuart J Beatty; Julie E Legg; James W McAuley
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 2.047

4.  Changes in clinical skills education resulting from the introduction of the USMLE step 2 clinical skills (CS) examination.

Authors:  William R Gilliland; Jeffrey La Rochelle; Richard Hawkins; Gerard F Dillon; Alex J Mechaber; Liselotte Dyrbye; Klara K Papp; Steven J Durning
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.650

5.  Progress examination for assessing students' readiness for advanced pharmacy practice experiences.

Authors:  Károly Mészáros; Mitchell J Barnett; Karna McDonald; Heidi Wehring; David J Evans; Debra Sasaki-Hill; Paul C Goldsmith; Katherine K Knapp
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2009-10-01       Impact factor: 2.047

6.  The relationship between formative and summative examinations and PANCE scores; can the past predict the future?

Authors:  Scott Massey; John Stallman; Louise Lee; Kathy Klingaman; David Holmerud
Journal:  J Physician Assist Educ       Date:  2011

7.  Pharmacy curriculum outcomes assessment for individual student assessment and curricular evaluation.

Authors:  Day M Scott; Lunawati L Bennett; Mary J Ferrill; Daniel L Brown
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 2.047

8.  Pharmacy students' test-taking motivation-effort on a low-stakes standardized test.

Authors:  Rhonda A Waskiewicz
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2011-04-11       Impact factor: 2.047

9.  Impact of HESI Specialty Exams: the ninth HESI Exit Exam validity study.

Authors:  Elizabeth L Zweighaft
Journal:  J Prof Nurs       Date:  2013 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.104

10.  Programmatic curricular outcomes assessment at colleges and schools of pharmacy in the United States and Puerto Rico.

Authors:  Harold L Kirschenbaum; Martin E Brown; Michelle M Kalis
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2006-02-15       Impact factor: 2.047

View more
  3 in total

1.  Assessing the Relationship Between Didactic Performance and Standardized Examination Scores in Pharmacy Students.

Authors:  Kimberly K Daugherty; Daniel R Malcom
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 2.047

2.  Characterization of Use of the Pharmacy Curriculum Outcomes Assessment Across Accredited Colleges of Pharmacy.

Authors:  Burgunda V Sweet; Mitra Assemi; Eric G Boyce; Margarita V DiVall; Linda S Garavalia; Justine Gortney; Marianne McCollum; Rochelle M Roberts
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 2.047

3.  Determination of predictors impacting performance on the third-year pharmacy curriculum outcomes assessment at a historically Black college of pharmacy.

Authors:  Salome Bwayo Weaver; Muhammad J Habib; La'Marcus T Wingate; Mary Awuonda
Journal:  Curr Pharm Teach Learn       Date:  2021-02-10
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.