Literature DB >> 20798805

Development of a reliable, valid annual skills mastery assessment examination.

Gregory L Alston1, Bryan L Love.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To develop a methodology for a reliable, valid annual skills mastery assessment examination to provide formative student feedback, inform curricular review, and comply with the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE) Standards 2007.
DESIGN: A sample of program-level ability-based outcomes skills were chosen for the examination. Test items were written, underwent quality control, and were scored for level of difficulty. Versions of the examination for first-, second-, third-, and fourth-year pharmacy students were developed and administered, the results were analyzed, reliability and validity were evaluated, and reports were generated. Item-writing guidelines, quality control procedures, and examination production steps were codified to create a criterion-referenced examination. Students and faculty advisors received detailed score reports and results were used to guide student performance and stimulate a review of curricular outcomes. ASSESSMENT: Content, criterion, and construct validity were analyzed as defined in the literature for the intended use of this assessment tool. Data suggest the Annual Skills Mastery Assessment (ASMA) examination is both reliable and valid. Students and faculty members were surveyed regarding the usefulness of the examination. Results indicate general satisfaction with the assessment program.
CONCLUSION: A reasonably reliable, reasonably valid multiple-choice annual skills mastery assessment for selected outcomes statements providing formative feedback and informed curricular review was developed.

Keywords:  ability-based outcomes; assessment; examination; progress examination; skill mastery

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20798805      PMCID: PMC2907845          DOI: 10.5688/aj740580

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ        ISSN: 0002-9459            Impact factor:   2.047


  4 in total

1.  The positive and negative consequences of multiple-choice testing.

Authors:  Henry L Roediger; Elizabeth J Marsh
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Curricular progress assessments: the MileMarker.

Authors:  Julianna E Szilagyi
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 2.047

Review 3.  Progress examinations in pharmacy education.

Authors:  Cecilia M Plaza
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2007-08-15       Impact factor: 2.047

4.  The effect of assessments and examinations on the learning of medical students.

Authors:  D I Newble; K Jaeger
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 6.251

  4 in total
  16 in total

1.  A model for curricular quality assessment and improvement.

Authors:  L Douglas Ried
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 2.047

2.  Development and Assessment of a Horizontally Integrated Biological Sciences Course Sequence for Pharmacy Education.

Authors:  Amie J Dirks-Naylor; Nicholas J D Wright; Gregory L Alston
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 2.047

3.  Creating and Assessing Student Perception of an Examination Mastery Score Report for a Pharmacotherapy Course.

Authors:  Greg L Alston; Donald S Nuzum; Angela Pegram; John Brock Harris
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2015-12-25       Impact factor: 2.047

4.  Implementation and Use of the Pharmacy Curriculum Outcomes Assessment at US Schools of Pharmacy.

Authors:  Justine Schuller Gortney; Brenda S Bray; Francine D Salinitri
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 2.047

5.  Reliability of a minimal competency score for an annual skills mastery assessment.

Authors:  Gregory L Alston; Wesley R Haltom
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2013-12-16       Impact factor: 2.047

6.  Incremental development of an integrated assessment method for the professional curriculum.

Authors:  Melissa S Medina; Mark L Britton; Nancy A Letassy; Vince Dennis; JoLaine R Draugalis
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2013-08-12       Impact factor: 2.047

7.  Educational testing and validity of conclusions in the scholarship of teaching and learning.

Authors:  Michael J Peeters; Svetlana A Beltyukova; Beth A Martin
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 2.047

8.  Correlation between active-learning coursework and student retention of core content during advanced pharmacy practice experiences.

Authors:  Kristy H Lucas; Julie A Testman; Marcella N Hoyland; Angel M Kimble; Mary L Euler
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2013-10-14       Impact factor: 2.047

Review 9.  A Call for an Integrated Program of Assessment.

Authors:  David W Fielding; Glenn Regehr
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 2.047

10.  A Process for Curricular Improvement Based on Evaluation of Student Performance on Milestone Examinations.

Authors:  Marcy Hernick; Ann C Hylton; Michael Justice
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2016-11-25       Impact factor: 2.047

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.