Literature DB >> 19002286

A progress assessment to evaluate pharmacy students' knowledge prior to beginning advanced pharmacy practice experiences.

Katherine A Kelley1, Stuart J Beatty, Julie E Legg, James W McAuley.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To develop an assessment that would (1) help doctor of pharmacy (PharmD) students review therapeutic decision making and build confidence in their skills, (2) provide pharmacy practice residents with the opportunity to lead small group discussions, and (3) provide the assessment committee with program-level assessment data.
DESIGN: A case-based interactive assessment was developed and delivered to PharmD students immediately prior to advanced pharmacy practice experiences (APPEs). The assessment used an audience response system to allow immediate feedback followed by small group discussions led by pharmacy-practice residents. Students self-assessed their knowledge and confidence levels and developed personalized learning objectives for APPEs. ASSESSMENT: Eighty-nine percent of students found the assessment useful, and pharmacy practice residents reported that it was helpful in developing precepting skills. The college assessment committee was able to use the data to supplement the ongoing College curricular mapping process.
CONCLUSIONS: An interactive assessment process can help students build confidence for experiential training, provide a learning opportunity for pharmacy residents, and produce program-level data for college assessment purposes. Planned modifications of the assessment include expanding the content areas covered and adding ability-based assessments such as communication skills.

Keywords:  ability-based outcomes; advanced pharmacy practice experience; assessment; audience response system; confidence

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19002286      PMCID: PMC2576427          DOI: 10.5688/aj720488

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ        ISSN: 0002-9459            Impact factor:   2.047


  2 in total

1.  Student assessment in the Ohio University College of Osteopathic Medicine CORE system: progress testing and objective structured clinical examinations.

Authors:  R Portanova; M Adelman; J D Jollick; S Schuler; M Modrzakowski; E Soper; B Ross-Lee
Journal:  J Am Osteopath Assoc       Date:  2000-11

Review 2.  Progress examinations in pharmacy education.

Authors:  Cecilia M Plaza
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2007-08-15       Impact factor: 2.047

  2 in total
  13 in total

1.  Concurrent use of an audience response system at a multi-campus college of pharmacy.

Authors:  Kevin A Clauson; Fadi M Alkhateeb; Devada Singh-Franco
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 2.047

2.  Correlation between active-learning coursework and student retention of core content during advanced pharmacy practice experiences.

Authors:  Kristy H Lucas; Julie A Testman; Marcella N Hoyland; Angel M Kimble; Mary L Euler
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2013-10-14       Impact factor: 2.047

Review 3.  Updated guidelines for manuscripts describing instructional design and assessment: the IDEAS format.

Authors:  Therese Poirier; Michael Crouch; George MacKinnon; Reza Mehvar; Mary Monk-Tutor
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 2.047

4.  Progress examination for assessing students' readiness for advanced pharmacy practice experiences.

Authors:  Károly Mészáros; Mitchell J Barnett; Karna McDonald; Heidi Wehring; David J Evans; Debra Sasaki-Hill; Paul C Goldsmith; Katherine K Knapp
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2009-10-01       Impact factor: 2.047

5.  Impact of a student response system on short- and long-term learning in a drug literature evaluation course.

Authors:  Flora C Liu; Jacob P Gettig; Nancy Fjortoft
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 2.047

Review 6.  A Call for an Integrated Program of Assessment.

Authors:  David W Fielding; Glenn Regehr
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 2.047

7.  Personalized Learning in an Online Drugs and US Health Care System Controversies Course.

Authors:  Sirikan Rojanasarot; Anna Milone; Rebecca Balestrieri; Amy L Pittenger
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 2.047

8.  A Five-Year Evaluation of Examination Structure in a Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy Course.

Authors:  Anne Schullo-Feulner; Claire Kolar; Kristin K Janke
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 2.047

9.  A Faculty Toolkit for Formative Assessment in Pharmacy Education.

Authors:  Margarita V DiVall; Greg L Alston; Eleanora Bird; Shauna M Buring; Katherine A Kelley; Nanci L Murphy; Lauren S Schlesselman; Cindy D Stowe; Julianna E Szilagyi
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2014-11-15       Impact factor: 2.047

Review 10.  Effectiveness of educational technology to improve patient care in pharmacy curricula.

Authors:  Michael A Smith; Neal Benedict
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 2.047

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.