Literature DB >> 31506351

Three archetypical classes of macromolecular regulators of protein liquid-liquid phase separation.

Archishman Ghosh1,2,3, Konstantinos Mazarakos2,3, Huan-Xiang Zhou4,3.   

Abstract

Membraneless organelles, corresponding to the droplet phase upon liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS) of protein or protein-RNA mixtures, mediate myriad cellular functions. Cells use a variety of biochemical signals such as expression level and posttranslational modification to regulate droplet formation and dissolution, but the physical basis of the regulatory mechanisms remains ill-defined and quantitative assessment of the effects is largely lacking. Our computational study predicted that the strength of attraction by droplet-forming proteins dictates whether and how macromolecular regulators promote or suppress LLPS. We experimentally tested this prediction, using the pentamers of SH3 domains and proline-rich motifs (SH35 and PRM5) as droplet-forming proteins. Determination of the changes in phase boundary and the partition coefficients in the droplet phase over a wide range of regulator concentrations yielded both a quantitative measure and a mechanistic understanding of the regulatory effects. Three archetypical classes of regulatory effects were observed. Ficoll 70 at high concentrations indirectly promoted SH35-PRM5 LLPS, by taking up volume in the bulk phase and thereby displacing SH35 and PRM5 into the droplet phase. Lysozyme had a moderate partition coefficient and suppressed LLPS by substituting weaker attraction with SH35 for the stronger SH35-PRM5 attraction in the droplet phase. By forming even stronger attraction with PRM5, heparin at low concentrations partitioned heavily into the droplet phase and promoted LLPS. These characteristics were recapitulated by computational results of patchy particle models, validating the identification of the 3 classes of macromolecular regulators as volume-exclusion promotors, weak-attraction suppressors, and strong-attraction promotors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  liquid–liquid phase separation; macromolecular regulator; membraneless organelles; partition coefficient

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31506351      PMCID: PMC6765290          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1907849116

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  37 in total

1.  A Liquid-to-Solid Phase Transition of the ALS Protein FUS Accelerated by Disease Mutation.

Authors:  Avinash Patel; Hyun O Lee; Louise Jawerth; Shovamayee Maharana; Marcus Jahnel; Marco Y Hein; Stoyno Stoynov; Julia Mahamid; Shambaditya Saha; Titus M Franzmann; Andrej Pozniakovski; Ina Poser; Nicola Maghelli; Loic A Royer; Martin Weigert; Eugene W Myers; Stephan Grill; David Drechsel; Anthony A Hyman; Simon Alberti
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  RNA Controls PolyQ Protein Phase Transitions.

Authors:  Huaiying Zhang; Shana Elbaum-Garfinkle; Erin M Langdon; Nicole Taylor; Patricia Occhipinti; Andrew A Bridges; Clifford P Brangwynne; Amy S Gladfelter
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 17.970

3.  CAMELOT: A machine learning approach for coarse-grained simulations of aggregation of block-copolymeric protein sequences.

Authors:  Kiersten M Ruff; Tyler S Harmon; Rohit V Pappu
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 3.488

4.  Application of fluorescent nanoparticles to study remodeling of the endo-lysosomal system by intracellular bacteria.

Authors:  Yuying Zhang; Viktoria Krieger; Michael Hensel
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2015-01-02       Impact factor: 1.355

5.  Residue-by-Residue View of In Vitro FUS Granules that Bind the C-Terminal Domain of RNA Polymerase II.

Authors:  Kathleen A Burke; Abigail M Janke; Christy L Rhine; Nicolas L Fawzi
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2015-10-08       Impact factor: 17.970

6.  Nucleophosmin integrates within the nucleolus via multi-modal interactions with proteins displaying R-rich linear motifs and rRNA.

Authors:  Diana M Mitrea; Jaclyn A Cika; Clifford S Guy; David Ban; Priya R Banerjee; Christopher B Stanley; Amanda Nourse; Ashok A Deniz; Richard W Kriwacki
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 8.140

7.  Phase transitions in the assembly of multivalent signalling proteins.

Authors:  Pilong Li; Sudeep Banjade; Hui-Chun Cheng; Soyeon Kim; Baoyu Chen; Liang Guo; Marc Llaguno; Javoris V Hollingsworth; David S King; Salman F Banani; Paul S Russo; Qiu-Xing Jiang; B Tracy Nixon; Michael K Rosen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Phase transition of a disordered nuage protein generates environmentally responsive membraneless organelles.

Authors:  Timothy J Nott; Evangelia Petsalaki; Patrick Farber; Dylan Jervis; Eden Fussner; Anne Plochowietz; Timothy D Craggs; David P Bazett-Jones; Tony Pawson; Julie D Forman-Kay; Andrew J Baldwin
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 17.970

9.  Controllable protein phase separation and modular recruitment to form responsive membraneless organelles.

Authors:  Benjamin S Schuster; Ellen H Reed; Ranganath Parthasarathy; Craig N Jahnke; Reese M Caldwell; Jessica G Bermudez; Holly Ramage; Matthew C Good; Daniel A Hammer
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-07-30       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Liquid-Liquid Phase Separation of Patchy Particles Illuminates Diverse Effects of Regulatory Components on Protein Droplet Formation.

Authors:  Valery Nguemaha; Huan-Xiang Zhou
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  31 in total

1.  Tug of War between Condensate Phases in a Minimal Macromolecular System.

Authors:  Archishman Ghosh; Xiaojia Zhang; Huan-Xiang Zhou
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2020-05-04       Impact factor: 15.419

2.  Viscoelasticity of biomolecular condensates conforms to the Jeffreys model.

Authors:  Huan-Xiang Zhou
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 3.488

3.  Comparative roles of charge, π, and hydrophobic interactions in sequence-dependent phase separation of intrinsically disordered proteins.

Authors:  Suman Das; Yi-Hsuan Lin; Robert M Vernon; Julie D Forman-Kay; Hue Sun Chan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Determinants for Fusion Speed of Biomolecular Droplets.

Authors:  Archishman Ghosh; Huan-Xiang Zhou
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2020-09-08       Impact factor: 15.336

5.  Liquid network connectivity regulates the stability and composition of biomolecular condensates with many components.

Authors:  Jorge R Espinosa; Jerelle A Joseph; Ignacio Sanchez-Burgos; Adiran Garaizar; Daan Frenkel; Rosana Collepardo-Guevara
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Profilin choreographs actin and microtubules in cells and cancer.

Authors:  Morgan L Pimm; Jessica Hotaling; Jessica L Henty-Ridilla
Journal:  Int Rev Cell Mol Biol       Date:  2020-07-16       Impact factor: 6.813

7.  Determination of Condensate Material Properties from Droplet Deformation.

Authors:  Huan-Xiang Zhou
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 2.991

8.  Dynamic metastable long-living droplets formed by sticker-spacer proteins.

Authors:  Srivastav Ranganathan; Eugene I Shakhnovich
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-06-02       Impact factor: 8.140

9.  Cluster Channeling in Cascade Reactions.

Authors:  Irina V Gopich
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 2.991

Review 10.  Physics-based computational and theoretical approaches to intrinsically disordered proteins.

Authors:  Joan-Emma Shea; Robert B Best; Jeetain Mittal
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 6.809

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.