OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and compliance of a remote blood pressure monitoring protocol implemented as a quality improvement measure at the hospital level for management of hypertension in postpartum women after hospital discharge. METHODS: This is an ongoing quality improvement project that included women admitted to the postpartum unit of a single tertiary care hospital. We designed nursing call center-driven blood pressure management and treatment algorithms, which were initiated after hospital discharge until 6 weeks postpartum. Women are eligible to participate if they have a diagnosis of chronic hypertension, superimposed preeclampsia, gestational hypertension, preeclampsia, or postpartum hypertension and have access to a text messaging-enabled smartphone device. After identification by an obstetric care provider, women are enrolled into the program, which is automatically indicated in the electronic medical record. Maternal, obstetric, and sociodemographic data were obtained from the electronic medical record. RESULTS: Between February 2018 and January 2019, we enrolled 499 patients. Here we report on the first 409 enrolled patients. Participants include 168 (41%) with gestational hypertension, 179 (44%) with preeclampsia with no history of chronic hypertension, 49 (12%) with chronic hypertension with superimposed preeclampsia, and 13 (3%) with postpartum preeclampsia. One hundred seventy-one (42%) participants had antihypertensives initiated or titrated through the program. Three hundred forty women (83%) continued the program beyond 3 weeks postpartum, and 360 (88%) attended an in-person 6-week postpartum visit. Two hundred thirty-five out of 250 women who completed a postprogram survey (94%) reported satisfaction with the program. CONCLUSION: In this study, we detail results from an ongoing remote blood pressure monitoring program. We demonstrate high compliance, retention, and patient satisfaction with the program. This is a feasible, scalable remote monitoring program connected to the electronic medical record.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and compliance of a remote blood pressure monitoring protocol implemented as a quality improvement measure at the hospital level for management of hypertension in postpartum women after hospital discharge. METHODS: This is an ongoing quality improvement project that included women admitted to the postpartum unit of a single tertiary care hospital. We designed nursing call center-driven blood pressure management and treatment algorithms, which were initiated after hospital discharge until 6 weeks postpartum. Women are eligible to participate if they have a diagnosis of chronic hypertension, superimposed preeclampsia, gestational hypertension, preeclampsia, or postpartum hypertension and have access to a text messaging-enabled smartphone device. After identification by an obstetric care provider, women are enrolled into the program, which is automatically indicated in the electronic medical record. Maternal, obstetric, and sociodemographic data were obtained from the electronic medical record. RESULTS: Between February 2018 and January 2019, we enrolled 499 patients. Here we report on the first 409 enrolled patients. Participants include 168 (41%) with gestational hypertension, 179 (44%) with preeclampsia with no history of chronic hypertension, 49 (12%) with chronic hypertension with superimposed preeclampsia, and 13 (3%) with postpartum preeclampsia. One hundred seventy-one (42%) participants had antihypertensives initiated or titrated through the program. Three hundred forty women (83%) continued the program beyond 3 weeks postpartum, and 360 (88%) attended an in-person 6-week postpartum visit. Two hundred thirty-five out of 250 women who completed a postprogram survey (94%) reported satisfaction with the program. CONCLUSION: In this study, we detail results from an ongoing remote blood pressure monitoring program. We demonstrate high compliance, retention, and patient satisfaction with the program. This is a feasible, scalable remote monitoring program connected to the electronic medical record.
Authors: Sarah J Rhoads; Christina I Serrano; Christian E Lynch; Songthip T Ounpraseuth; C Heath Gauss; Nalin Payakachat; Curtis L Lowery; Hari Eswaran Journal: Telemed J E Health Date: 2017-05-05 Impact factor: 3.536
Authors: Thomas G Pickering; Nancy Houston Miller; Gbenga Ogedegbe; Lawrence R Krakoff; Nancy T Artinian; David Goff Journal: Hypertension Date: 2008-05-22 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: Wendy L Bennett; Hsien-Yen Chang; David M Levine; Lin Wang; Donna Neale; Erika F Werner; Jeanne M Clark Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2014-01-29 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Demilade A Adedinsewo; Amy W Pollak; Sabrina D Phillips; Taryn L Smith; Anna Svatikova; Sharonne N Hayes; Sharon L Mulvagh; Colleen Norris; Veronique L Roger; Peter A Noseworthy; Xiaoxi Yao; Rickey E Carter Journal: Circ Res Date: 2022-02-17 Impact factor: 23.213
Authors: Vesna D Garovic; Ralf Dechend; Thomas Easterling; S Ananth Karumanchi; Suzanne McMurtry Baird; Laura A Magee; Sarosh Rana; Jane V Vermunt; Phyllis August Journal: Hypertension Date: 2021-12-15 Impact factor: 9.897
Authors: Natalie A Bello; Akanksha Agrawal; Melinda B Davis; Colleen M Harrington; Kathryn J Lindley; Margo B Minissian; Garima Sharma; Mary Norine Walsh; Ki Park Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2022-04-18 Impact factor: 6.106
Authors: Nicole A Thomas; Anna Drewry; Susan Racine Passmore; Nadia Assad; Kara K Hoppe Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Date: 2021-02-19 Impact factor: 3.007
Authors: Alisse Hauspurg; Lara Lemon; Camila Cabrera; Amal Javaid; Anna Binstock; Beth Quinn; Jacob Larkin; Andrew R Watson; Richard H Beigi; Hyagriv Simhan Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2020-12-01
Authors: Ellen W Seely; Ann C Celi; Jaimie Chausmer; Cornelia Graves; Sarah Kilpatrick; Jacinda M Nicklas; Mary L Rosser; Kathryn M Rexrode; Jennifer J Stuart; Eleni Tsigas; Jennifer Voelker; Carolyn Zelop; Janet W Rich-Edwards Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2020-09-28 Impact factor: 2.681