Literature DB >> 33607957

Patient perceptions, opinions and satisfaction of telehealth with remote blood pressure monitoring postpartum.

Nicole A Thomas1, Anna Drewry2, Susan Racine Passmore3, Nadia Assad4, Kara K Hoppe2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Our aim was to conduct a post participation survey of respondent experiences with in-home remote patient monitoring via telehealth for blood pressure monitoring of women with postpartum hypertension. We hypothesized that the in-home remote patient monitoring application will be implemented with strong fidelity and have positive patient acceptability.
METHODS: This analysis was a planned secondary analysis of a non-randomized controlled trial of telehealth with remote blood pressure patient monitoring for postpartum hypertension compared to standard outpatient monitoring in women with a hypertension-related diagnosis during pregnancy. In collaboration with survey experts, we developed a 41-item web-based survey to assess 1) perception of quality of care received, 2) ease of use/ease to learn the telehealth program, 3) effective orientation of equipment, 4) level of perceived security/privacy utilizing telehealth and 5) problems encountered. The survey included multiple question formats including Likert scale responses, dichotomous Yes/No responses, and free text. We performed a descriptive analysis on all responses and then performed regression analysis on a subset of questions most relevant to the domains of interest. The qualitative data collected through open ended responses was analyzed to determine relevant categories. Intervention participants who completed the study received the survey at the 6-week study endpoint.
RESULTS: Sixty six percent of respondents completed the survey. The majority of women found the technology fit easily into their lifestyle. Privacy concerns were minimal and factors that influenced this included age, BMI, marital status, and readmissions. 95% of women preferred remote care for postpartum follow-up, in which hypertensive type, medication use and ethnicity were found to be significant factors in influencing location of follow-up. Most women were satisfied with the devices, but rates varied by hypertensive type, infant discharge rates and BMI.
CONCLUSIONS: Postpartum women perceived the telehealth remote intervention was a safe, easy to use method that represented an acceptable burden of care and an overall satisfying method for postpartum blood pressure monitoring. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identification number: NCT03111095 Date of registration: April 12, 2017.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Participant satisfaction; Postpartum hypertension; Qualitative evaluation; Remote patient monitoring; Telehealth

Year:  2021        PMID: 33607957      PMCID: PMC7896378          DOI: 10.1186/s12884-021-03632-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth        ISSN: 1471-2393            Impact factor:   3.007


  8 in total

1.  The qualitative content analysis process.

Authors:  Satu Elo; Helvi Kyngäs
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.187

2.  Comparing standard office-based follow-up with text-based remote monitoring in the management of postpartum hypertension: a randomised clinical trial.

Authors:  Adi Hirshberg; Katheryne Downes; Sindhu Srinivas
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2018-04-27       Impact factor: 7.035

3.  Exploring Implementation of m-Health Monitoring in Postpartum Women with Hypertension.

Authors:  Sarah J Rhoads; Christina I Serrano; Christian E Lynch; Songthip T Ounpraseuth; C Heath Gauss; Nalin Payakachat; Curtis L Lowery; Hari Eswaran
Journal:  Telemed J E Health       Date:  2017-05-05       Impact factor: 3.536

4.  Telehealth with remote blood pressure monitoring for postpartum hypertension: A prospective single-cohort feasibility study.

Authors:  Kara K Hoppe; Makeba Williams; Nicole Thomas; Julia B Zella; Anna Drewry; KyungMann Kim; Thomas Havighurst; Heather M Johnson
Journal:  Pregnancy Hypertens       Date:  2018-12-31       Impact factor: 2.899

5.  A Postpartum Remote Hypertension Monitoring Protocol Implemented at the Hospital Level.

Authors:  Alisse Hauspurg; Lara S Lemon; Beth A Quinn; Anna Binstock; Jacob Larkin; Richard H Beigi; Andrew R Watson; Hyagriv N Simhan
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  Blood pressure self-monitoring in pregnancy (BuMP) feasibility study; a qualitative analysis of women's experiences of self-monitoring.

Authors:  Lisa Hinton; Katherine L Tucker; Sheila M Greenfield; James A Hodgkinson; Lucy Mackillop; Christine McCourt; Trisha Carver; Carole Crawford; Margaret Glogowska; Louise Locock; Mary Selwood; Kathryn S Taylor; Richard J McManus
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 3.007

7.  Implementing self-management: a mixed methods study of women's experiences of a postpartum hypertension intervention (SNAP-HT).

Authors:  Alexandra E Cairns; Katherine L Tucker; Carole Crawford; Richard J McManus; John Powell
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 2.279

8.  Telehealth Interventions to Improve Obstetric and Gynecologic Health Outcomes: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Nathaniel DeNicola; Daniel Grossman; Kathryn Marko; Sarita Sonalkar; Yvonne S Butler Tobah; Nihar Ganju; Catherine T Witkop; Jillian T Henderson; Jessica L Butler; Curtis Lowery
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 7.623

  8 in total
  4 in total

1.  Implementing a self-monitoring application during pregnancy and postpartum for rural and underserved women: A qualitative needs assessment study.

Authors:  Marlo M Vernon; Frances M Yang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 3.752

Review 2.  Sociotechnical Factors Affecting Patients' Adoption of Mobile Health Tools: Systematic Literature Review and Narrative Synthesis.

Authors:  Christine Jacob; Emre Sezgin; Antonio Sanchez-Vazquez; Chris Ivory
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 4.947

Review 3.  Learning from COVID-19 related trial adaptations to inform efficient trial design-a sequential mixed methods study.

Authors:  Robin Chatters; Cindy L Cooper; Alicia O'Cathain; Caroline Murphy; Athene Lane; Katie Sutherland; Christopher Burton; Angela Cape; Louis Tunnicliffe
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 4.612

Review 4.  Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: definition, management, and out-of-office blood pressure measurement.

Authors:  Hirohito Metoki; Noriyuki Iwama; Hirotaka Hamada; Michihiro Satoh; Takahisa Murakami; Mami Ishikuro; Taku Obara
Journal:  Hypertens Res       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 5.528

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.