BACKGROUND: Because pregnancy complications, including gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and hypertensive disorders in pregnancy, are risk factors for diabetes and cardiovascular disease, post-delivery follow-up is recommended. OBJECTIVE: To determine predictors of post-delivery primary and obstetric care utilization in women with and without medical complications. RESEARCH DESIGN: Five-year retrospective cohort study using commercial and Medicaid insurance claims in Maryland. SUBJECTS: 7,741 women with a complicated pregnancy (GDM, hypertensive disorders and pregestational diabetes mellitus [DM]) and 23,599 women with a comparison pregnancy. MEASURES: We compared primary and postpartum obstetric care utilization rates in the 12 months after delivery between the complicated and comparison pregnancy groups. We conducted multivariate logistic regression to assess the association between pregnancy complications, sociodemographic predictor variables and utilization of care, stratified by insurance type. RESULTS: Women with a complicated pregnancy were older at delivery (p < 0.001), with higher rates of cesarean delivery (p < 0.0001) and preterm labor or delivery (p < 0.0001). Among women with Medicaid, 56.6% in the complicated group and 51.7% in the comparison group attended a primary care visit. Statistically significant predictors of receiving a primary care visit included non-Black race, older age, preeclampsia or DM, and depression. Among women with commercial health insurance, 60.0% in the complicated group and 49.5% in the comparison group attended a primary care visit. Pregnancy complication did not predict a primary care visit among women with commercial insurance. CONCLUSIONS: Women with pregnancy complications were more likely to attend primary care visits post-delivery compared to the comparison group, but overall visit rates were low. Although Medicaid expansion has potential to increase coverage, innovative models for preventive health services after delivery are needed to target women at higher risk for chronic disease development.
BACKGROUND: Because pregnancy complications, including gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and hypertensive disorders in pregnancy, are risk factors for diabetes and cardiovascular disease, post-delivery follow-up is recommended. OBJECTIVE: To determine predictors of post-delivery primary and obstetric care utilization in women with and without medical complications. RESEARCH DESIGN: Five-year retrospective cohort study using commercial and Medicaid insurance claims in Maryland. SUBJECTS: 7,741 women with a complicated pregnancy (GDM, hypertensive disorders and pregestational diabetes mellitus [DM]) and 23,599 women with a comparison pregnancy. MEASURES: We compared primary and postpartum obstetric care utilization rates in the 12 months after delivery between the complicated and comparison pregnancy groups. We conducted multivariate logistic regression to assess the association between pregnancy complications, sociodemographic predictor variables and utilization of care, stratified by insurance type. RESULTS:Women with a complicated pregnancy were older at delivery (p < 0.001), with higher rates of cesarean delivery (p < 0.0001) and preterm labor or delivery (p < 0.0001). Among women with Medicaid, 56.6% in the complicated group and 51.7% in the comparison group attended a primary care visit. Statistically significant predictors of receiving a primary care visit included non-Black race, older age, preeclampsia or DM, and depression. Among women with commercial health insurance, 60.0% in the complicated group and 49.5% in the comparison group attended a primary care visit. Pregnancy complication did not predict a primary care visit among women with commercial insurance. CONCLUSIONS:Women with pregnancy complications were more likely to attend primary care visits post-delivery compared to the comparison group, but overall visit rates were low. Although Medicaid expansion has potential to increase coverage, innovative models for preventive health services after delivery are needed to target women at higher risk for chronic disease development.
Authors: Boyd E Metzger; Thomas A Buchanan; Donald R Coustan; Alberto de Leiva; David B Dunger; David R Hadden; Moshe Hod; John L Kitzmiller; Siri L Kjos; Jeremy N Oats; David J Pettitt; David A Sacks; Christos Zoupas Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2007-07 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Michelle A Russell; Maureen G Phipps; Courtney L Olson; H Gilbert Welch; Marshall W Carpenter Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2006-12 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: D B Carr; K M Newton; K M Utzschneider; J Tong; F Gerchman; S E Kahn; T R Easterling; S R Heckbert Journal: Hypertens Pregnancy Date: 2009-08 Impact factor: 2.108
Authors: Shin Y Kim; Carina Saraiva; Michael Curtis; Hoyt G Wilson; Jennifer Troyan; Andrea J Sharma Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2013-08-15 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Nomi S Weiss-Laxer; Rheanna Platt; Lauren M Osborne; Mary Kimmel; Barry S Solomon; Tamar Mendelson; Lindsey Webb; Anne W Riley Journal: Pediatr Res Date: 2015-10-20 Impact factor: 3.756
Authors: Marian P Jarlenski; Margaret S Chisolm; Sarah Kachur; Donna M Neale; Wendy L Bennett Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2015-05 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Nisha I Parikh; Margareta Norberg; Erik Ingelsson; Sven Cnattingius; Ramachandran S Vasan; Magnus Domellöf; Jan Håkan Jansson; Anna-Karin Edstedt Bonamy Journal: Hypertension Date: 2017-01-30 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: Lois McCloskey; Judith Bernstein; Linda Goler-Blount; Ann Greiner; Anna Norton; Emily Jones; Chloe E Bird Journal: Womens Health Issues Date: 2021-03-07
Authors: Maya Venkataramani; Tina L Cheng; Hsien-Chieh Yeh; Wendy L Bennett; Nisa M Maruthur Journal: J Am Board Fam Med Date: 2020 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 2.657