Alisse Hauspurg1,2, Malamo E Countouris3, Janet M Catov4,5,6. 1. Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. 2. Magee-Womens Research Institute, University of Pittsburgh, 300 Halket Street, Suite 2315, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA. 3. University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Heart and Vascular Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. 4. Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. catovjm@upmc.edu. 5. Magee-Womens Research Institute, University of Pittsburgh, 300 Halket Street, Suite 2315, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA. catovjm@upmc.edu. 6. Department of Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. catovjm@upmc.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To review the postpartum management of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. RECENT FINDINGS: Hypertensive disorders are associated with an increased risk of future cardiovascular disease; however, there is a poor understanding of the underlying mechanisms and few recommendations to guide care in the postpartum period. Recent studies have shown high rates of masked hypertension and home blood pressure monitoring in the first year postpartum may be a promising opportunity to monitor health given evidence of high maternal adherence to this approach. In longer term, women with a history of a hypertensive disorder of pregnancy have higher blood pressures, increased risk of metabolic syndrome, and perhaps excess diastolic dysfunction. Triaging risk and improving handoff from the obstetrician to the primary care provider or subspecialist should be a priority in this population. Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy remain an untapped opportunity to identify excess cardiovascular risk in affected women at a time when mitigating that risk during the reproductive years has the potential to improve future pregnancy health as well as improve women's long-term cardiometabolic health.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To review the postpartum management of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. RECENT FINDINGS:Hypertensive disorders are associated with an increased risk of future cardiovascular disease; however, there is a poor understanding of the underlying mechanisms and few recommendations to guide care in the postpartum period. Recent studies have shown high rates of masked hypertension and home blood pressure monitoring in the first year postpartum may be a promising opportunity to monitor health given evidence of high maternal adherence to this approach. In longer term, women with a history of a hypertensive disorder of pregnancy have higher blood pressures, increased risk of metabolic syndrome, and perhaps excess diastolic dysfunction. Triaging risk and improving handoff from the obstetrician to the primary care provider or subspecialist should be a priority in this population. Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy remain an untapped opportunity to identify excess cardiovascular risk in affected women at a time when mitigating that risk during the reproductive years has the potential to improve future pregnancy health as well as improve women's long-term cardiometabolic health.
Authors: Scott M Grundy; Neil J Stone; Alison L Bailey; Craig Beam; Kim K Birtcher; Roger S Blumenthal; Lynne T Braun; Sarah de Ferranti; Joseph Faiella-Tommasino; Daniel E Forman; Ronald Goldberg; Paul A Heidenreich; Mark A Hlatky; Daniel W Jones; Donald Lloyd-Jones; Nuria Lopez-Pajares; Chiadi E Ndumele; Carl E Orringer; Carmen A Peralta; Joseph J Saseen; Sidney C Smith; Laurence Sperling; Salim S Virani; Joseph Yeboah Journal: Circulation Date: 2018-11-10 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: N M Milic; J Milin-Lazovic; T L Weissgerber; G Trajkovic; W M White; V D Garovic Journal: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol Date: 2017-01 Impact factor: 7.299
Authors: Paul K Whelton; Robert M Carey; Wilbert S Aronow; Donald E Casey; Karen J Collins; Cheryl Dennison Himmelfarb; Sondra M DePalma; Samuel Gidding; Kenneth A Jamerson; Daniel W Jones; Eric J MacLaughlin; Paul Muntner; Bruce Ovbiagele; Sidney C Smith; Crystal C Spencer; Randall S Stafford; Sandra J Taler; Randal J Thomas; Kim A Williams; Jeff D Williamson; Jackson T Wright Journal: Hypertension Date: 2017-11-13 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: Maria C Cusimano; Jessica Pudwell; Michelle Roddy; Chan-Kyung Jane Cho; Graeme N Smith Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2013-12-04 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Anouk Bokslag; Pim W Teunissen; Constantijn Franssen; Floortje van Kesteren; Otto Kamp; Wessel Ganzevoort; Walter J Paulus; Christianne J M de Groot Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2017-02-14 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Eliza C Miller; Amelia K Boehme; Nadia T Chung; Sophia S Wang; James V Lacey; Kamakshi Lakshminarayan; Charlie Zhong; Daniel Woo; Natalie A Bello; Ronald Wapner; Mitchell S V Elkind; Joshua Z Willey Journal: Neurology Date: 2018-12-26 Impact factor: 11.800
Authors: Anne S Ersbøll; Annemie S Bojer; Maria G Hauge; Marianne Johansen; Peter Damm; Finn Gustafsson; Niels G Vejlstrup Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2018-10-16 Impact factor: 5.501
Authors: Victoria E de Knegt; Paula L Hedley; Jørgen K Kanters; Ida N Thagaard; Lone Krebs; Michael Christiansen; Ulrik Lausten-Thomsen Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2021-04-27 Impact factor: 5.923
Authors: Maria C Adank; Laura Benschop; Sophia P van Streun; Anna M Smak Gregoor; Monique T Mulder; Eric A P Steegers; Sarah Schalekamp-Timmermans; Jeanine E Roeters van Lennep Journal: BMC Med Date: 2020-12-23 Impact factor: 8.775