| Literature DB >> 31492910 |
Julie K Fierle1, Johan Abram-Saliba1, Matteo Brioschi1, Mariastella deTiani1, George Coukos2, Steven M Dunn3.
Abstract
An early bottleneck in the rapid isolation of new antibody fragment binders using in vitro library approaches is the inertia encountered in acquiring and preparing soluble antigen fragments. In this report, we describe a simple, yet powerful strategy that exploits the properties of the SpyCatcher/SpyTag (SpyC/SpyT) covalent interaction to improve substantially the speed and efficiency in obtaining functional antibody clones of interest. We demonstrate that SpyC has broad utility as a protein-fusion tag partner in a eukaryotic expression/secretion context, retaining its functionality and permitting the direct, selective capture and immobilization of soluble antigen fusions using solid phase media coated with a synthetic modified SpyT peptide reagent. In addition, we show that the expressed SpyC-antigen format is highly compatible with downstream antibody phage display selection and screening procedures, requiring minimal post-expression handling with no sample modifications. To illustrate the potential of the approach, we have isolated several fully human germline scFvs that selectively recognize therapeutically relevant native cell surface tumor antigens in various in vitro cell-based assay contexts.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31492910 PMCID: PMC6731262 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-49233-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Production and functional evaluation of mammalian extracellular antigen-SpyCatcher fusions. (a) Schematic representation of the direct capture and immobilization (dCI) of SpyC-antigens via surface-bound bSpyT. (b,c) Mammalian cell expression and direct capture of representative SpyC-antigen fusions (see Table 1) on bSpyT-loaded magnetic beads. (b) Coomassie-stained SDS-PAGE (reducing). The insert-less pSTEVe49 vector cassette expresses the free HA-tagged SpyC (far right). (c) Anti-HA tag ECL Western staining of recombinant SpyC-antigens expressed in HEK culture supernatants (‘S’), and following selective covalent enrichment on SpyT beads (‘B’). Covalent immobilization to SpyT on the beads results in a shift to a higher MW corresponding to the mass of the peptide adduct. Samples were run on separate gels and interspersed with irrelevant samples, but were processed in parallel. Full-length gel and blot images can be found in Supplementary Fig. S2. (c) ELISA illustrating functional recognition of selected immobilized dCI SpyC-antigens by cognate recombinant ligands.
Antigen ECD fragments evaluated as SpyC fusions in the current study, and selected physical characteristics.
| Antigen ECD | Key Architecture | PTM | MW/pI | Vector | Expression | Capture |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| β; FBR; IgS | — | 12.5/4.6 | e49 | ✓ | ✓ |
| CD3εδ | β; IgC | 2 N-gly (δ) | 21.5/4.6 | e20 | ✓ | ✓ |
| CD3γε | β; IgC | 2 N-gly (γ) | 22.7/5.0 | e20 | ✓ | ✓ |
| EpCAM | α/β; Thy1 | 3 N-gly | 27.3/5.6 | e38 | ✓ | ✗ |
| e49 | ✓ | ✓ | ||||
| TEM8 | α/β; VWFA | 3 N-gly | 33.1/5.4 | e38 | ✓ | ✗ |
| TEM8 ( | α/β; VWFA | 2 N-gly | 23.3/5.3 | e38 | ✓ | ✓ |
| TEM1 (cΔ) | α/β; CTL; Sus; EGFLc | ~4 O-gly | 37.6/4.6 | e20 | ✓ | ✓ |
| TEM1 (cΔ)* | α/β; CTL; Sus; EGFLc | ~9 O-gly | 49.4/4.6 | e20 | ✓ | ✓ |
| TEM1 (nΔ) | Mucin-like domain | ~15 O-gly | 14.0/7.2 | e49 | ✓ | ✓ |
| CEACAM1 | β; IgV, IgC | ~20 N-gly | 31.8/4.7 | e38 | ✓ | ✓ |
| CEACAM5 (CEA) | β; IgV, IgC | ~28 N-gly | 32.3/5.6 | e38 | ✓ | ✓ |
| CEACAM6 | β; IgV, IgC | ~12 N-gly | 31.4/5.1 | e38 | ✓ | ✓ |
| CD70 | β/coil‡; TNF-L | 2 N-gly | 17.4/8.9 | e38 | ✓ (weak) | ✓ (weak) |
| e49 | ✓ | ✓ | ||||
| Mesothelin | α; ATR | 3 N-gly | 34.3/5.0 | e38 | ✓ | ✓ |
| ROR1 | β/coil‡; IgC; Krn; Frz | 4 N-gly | 42.5/5.4 | e38 | ✓ | ✓ |
| ROR2 | β/coil‡; IgC, Krn, Frz | 3 N-gly | 41.5/6.2 | e38 | ✗ | ✗ |
| TNFR2 | β/coil; tnfr-cr | 4 O-,2 N-gly | 25.3/7.0 | e38 | ✓ | ✓ |
| CD19 | β/coil; IgC | 5 N-gly | 29.8/7.2 | e38 | ✗ | ✗ |
| e49 | ✓ | ✓ | ||||
| BCMA | β/turn; tnfr-cr | 5.9/7.6 | e38 | ✓ | ✓ | |
| CTLA4 | β; IgV | 2 N-gly | 13.5/4.6 | e38 | ✓ | ✓ |
| e49 | ✓ | ✓ | ||||
| PD1 | β; IgV | 4 N-gly | 16.3/8.8 | e38 | ✓ | ✓ |
| Tigit | β; IgV | 2 N-gly | 13.2/4.8 | e38 | ✓ | ✓ |
| TIM3 | β; IgV | 1 O-,1 N-gly | 20.2/6.6 | e38 | ✓ | ✓ |
| TIM1 | β; IgV; mucin stalk | x O-,4 N-gly | 29.1/7.0 | e38 | ✓ ( | ✓ ( |
| e49 | ✓ ( | ✓ ( | ||||
| HER2-CTF611 | N/A (peptide) | 1 N-gly | 4.7/4.4 | e38 | ✓ | ✓ |
| PSMA | α/β; PA; pM28 | 10 N-gly | 79.5/6.4 | e49 | ✗ | ✗ |
| SIRPα | β; IgV | 12.9/8.0 | e38 | ✓ | ✓ | |
| SIRPα* | β; IgV | 2 N-gly | 12.9/9.0 | e38 | ✓ | ✓ |
| CD47 | β; IgV | 5 N-gly | 13.5/5.4 | e20 | ✗ | ✗ |
| e38 | ✓ |
| ||||
| CD47* | β; IgV | 6 N-gly | 13.7/5.1 | e20 | ✓ | ✓ |
| FRα | 25.1/8.3 | e38 | ✓ (weak) | ✗ | ||
| LAG-3 | β; IgV, IgC | 46.1/9.5 | e38 | ✓ (weak) | ✗ | |
| EGFRvIII | β; RLD; FL; GFR4 | 8 N-gly | 38.3/6.5 | e38 | ✓ | ✓ |
Unless otherwise indicated, the recombinant ECDs are human and terminate proximal to a predicted TM domain/GPI anchor. Indicated potential post-translational modifications are derived from curated UniprotKB features and predictive O-glycosylation tools (NetOGlyc 4.0 Server)[43]. Fusions were assessed for both expression and bead-capture by SDS-PAGE and anti-HA tag ECL Western blotting. Domain folds and motifs: FBR, fibronectin binding repeat; IgS, Ig-superfamily; thy1, thyroglobulin-like type 1; IgV, Ig-like V-type; IgC, Ig-like C2-type; VWFA, Von Willebrand factor type A; CTL, C-type lectin-like; Sus, Sushi; EGFLc, EGF-like calcium binding; ATR, ARM-type repeats; Krn, kringle; Frz, Frizzled; TNF-L, Tumor Necrosis Factor-like; tnfr-cr, TNFR cysteine rich repeats; PA, protease associated; pM28, peptidase M28; RLD, Receptor L-domain; FL, furin-like cysteine-rich; GFR4, growth factor receptor 4 domain. *Murine sequence; ‡prediction by PSIPRED v3.3; nSP, native signal peptide; cΔ, ECD truncation with C-terminal (membrane proximal) deletion; nΔ, ECD truncation with N-terminal (membrane distal) deletion; Het, expression and/or capture product appears very heterogeneous by SDS-PAGE; NT, not tested.
R1 and R2 input and output panning metrics illustrating respective library enrichments and primary ELISA hit-rates for both TEM1-bio and TEM1-SpyC antigens.
| Library | hTEM1-bio | hTEM1-SpyC | mTEM1-SpyC | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| λ | κ | λ | κ | λ | κ | ||
| R1 | Input (phage; CFU) | 7.4 × 1012 | 5.3 × 1012 | 7.4 × 1012 | 5.3 × 1012 | 7.4 × 1012 | 5.3 × 1012 |
| Output (CFU) | 1.4 × 106 | 1.1 × 106 | 5.6 × 105 | 6.3 × 105 | 4.4 × 105 | 3.2 × 105 | |
| R2 | Input (phage; CFU) | 1.6 × 1011 | 1.2 × 1011 | 1.2 × 1011 | 1.4 × 1011 | 2.4 × 1011 | 1.9 × 1011 |
| Output (CFU) | 2.3 × 109 | 1.7 × 109 | 3.0 × 109 | 2.6 × 109 | 5.3 × 109 | 4.1 × 109 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| R2 | ELISA hit rate (%)‡ | 43 | 25 | 56 | 42 | 68 | 44 |
CFU, colony-forming units; *(R2 Output/Input)/(R1 output/input), ‡signal threshold >5x background.
Figure 2Phage display versus TEM1 antigen format. Raw ELISA profiling data for 30 randomly selected scFv hit clones isolated from the dCI h/mTEM1-SpyC antigen panning experiments. Bar length reflects the relative ELISA signal strengths for human and murine TEM1-SpyC and recombinant, CHO-cell derived and purified TEM1 full-length ECD antigens (L). ELISAs were conducted separately and independently for the TEM1-SpyC and TEM1 (L) antigens. Identical clone sequences obtained from 21 randomly picked hTEM1-bio R2 ELISA hits are shaded. SpyC antigens were captured via dCI on prepared streptavidin-bSpyT plate well surfaces whereas purified recombinant TEM1 (L) was immobilized on plate wells by passive adsorption.
Figure 3Characterization of anti-TEM1 clones isolated by dCI SpyC-antigen selection. (a) Binding of reformatted and purified scFv-Fc (hIgG1) clones (2 μg/ml) to human and murine cell lines. A673, human Ewing’s sarcoma; SK-N-AS, human neuroblastoma; 2H11, murine tumor vascular endothelium; TC1, murine lung adenocarcinoma; HEK293-6E, human embryonic kidney; HT-1080, human fibrosarcoma; MDA-MB-231, human mammary carcinoma; MS1, murine pancreatic islet endothelium. Additionally, binding of anti-TEM1 scFv-Fc clones to HEK293T cells transiently transfected with native FL-hTEM1 and an irrelevant surface protein (αhCD19:28ζ CAR) control is also shown. (b) SPR monovalent affinity determination of parental clone HS06 (left) and an affinity-matured variant, HS06mut (right). hTEM1-SpyC has been used as the immobilized ligand and monovalent HS06/HS06mut monovalent BiTE as the soluble analyte, with concentration ranges of 100, 50, 25, 12.5 and 0 nM for HS06, and 5, 2.5, 1.25, 0.625 and 0 nM for HS06mut. (c) Binding of HS06mut variant scFv-Fc (0.1 μg/ml) to endogenous human (A673) and murine (2H11) TEM1+ cell lines.
Figure 4Functional T cell bridging and target cell engagement by anti-mesothelin scFvs isolated from dCI selection experiments. (a) Induction of NFAT-driven expression of luciferase in Jurkat reporter cells transduced with anti-mesothelin CARs employing different scFv clones. Luciferase activity was measured after 24 h of co-culture with mesothelin expressing target cells (H-226, AsPC-1) or meso-negative Raji B cells. CD19 and P4 CARs are included as positive controls for CD19 and mesothelin respectively. NT, non-transformed control. (b) Induction of NFAT-driven expression of luciferase in Jurkat reporter cells in the presence of H-226 (left), and AsPC-1 (right) target cells and soluble T cell engagers. Dashed lines represent baseline stimulation in the presence of engager molecule and HEK293-6E mesothelin-negative cells. (c) Mesothelin specific T cell engager constructed from clone HS201 redirects primary human CD8+ T cells to kill H-226 tumor target cells. Image-based acquisition of Cytotox Red fluorescence reports the extent and real-time kinetics of killing. Baseline killing was determined against irrelevant meso-negative A673 cells using 750 pM engager. (d) Time-dependent killing of H-226 cells in the presence of 2 nM HS201 engager by primary human T cells (Pan-T purified; 14 days post isolation). Dead cell clusters emit red fluorescence.