| Literature DB >> 34885044 |
Judith Anna Delage1, Silvano Gnesin2, John O Prior3, Jacques Barbet4, Patricia Le Saëc5, Séverine Marionneau-Lambot5, Sébastien Gouard5, Michel Chérel5, Mickael Bourgeois4, Niklaus Schaefer3, David Viertl6,7, Julie Katrin Fierle8, Steven Mark Dunn8, Alain Faivre-Chauvet5.
Abstract
1C1m-Fc, a promising anti-TEM-1 DOTA conjugate, was labeled with 64Cu to target cancer cells for PET imaging and predicting the efficacy and safety of a previously studied [177Lu]Lu-1C1m-Fc companion therapy. DOTA-conjugated 1C1m-Fc was characterized by mass spectrometry, thin layer chromatography and immunoreactivity assessment. PET/CT and biodistribution studies were performed in human neuroblastoma xenografted mice. Absorbed doses were assessed from biodistribution results and extrapolated to 177Lu based on the [64Cu]Cu-1C1m-Fc data. The immunoreactivity was ≥ 70% after 48 h of incubation in serum, and the specificity of [64Cu]Cu-1C1m-Fc for the target was validated. High-resolution PET/CT images were obtained, with the best tumor-to-organ ratios reached at 24 or 48 h and correlated with results of the biodistribution study. Healthy organs receiving the highest doses were the liver, the kidneys and the uterus. [64Cu]Cu-1C1m-Fc could be of interest to give an indication of 177Lu dosimetry for parenchymal organs. In the uterus and the tumor, characterized by specific TEM-1 expression, the 177Lu-extrapolated absorbed doses are overestimated because of the lack of later measurement time points. Nevertheless, 1C1m-Fc radiolabeled with 64Cu for imaging would appear as an interesting radionuclide companion for therapeutic application with [177Lu]Lu-1C1m-Fc.Entities:
Keywords: DOTA conjugation; Lutetium-177; PET imaging; copper-64; dosimetry; theranostic; tumor endothelial marker 1
Year: 2021 PMID: 34885044 PMCID: PMC8657097 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13235936
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancers (Basel) ISSN: 2072-6694 Impact factor: 6.639
Figure 1Radio–TLC example of [64Cu]Cu-1C1m-Fc. The radiochemical purity (RCP) is 99.85%. [64Cu]Cu-1C1m-Fc remains at Rf = 0, and the unbound [64Cu]Cu-EDTA migrates to the solvent front. With the used radiolabeling process, the average radiochemical purity was 99.5 ± 0.6% immediately after radiolabeling (n = 5) and 98.3 ± 2.1% (n = 3) after 24 h. The specific activity was comprised between 156 and 200 MBq/mg.
Immunoreactivity assessment of [64Cu]Cu-1C1m-Fc after incubation in serum. The results are expressed as mean ± SD.
| Immunoreactivity (%) ± SD | 4 h | 24 h | 48 h |
|---|---|---|---|
| [64Cu]Cu-3DOTA-1C1m-Fc | 76 ± 1.4 | 70 | NA |
| [64Cu]Cu-4DOTA-1C1m-Fc | 75 ± 15 | 77 ± 14 | 72 ± 13 |
Figure 2[64Cu]Cu-1C1m-Fc dorsal view PET/CT fusion maximum intensity projection in mouse bearing TEM-1-positive tumors (SK-N-AS, left flank, red arrow), (a) at 4 h, (b) at 24 h, (c) at 48 h.
Figure 3[64Cu]Cu-1C1m-Fc dorsal view PET/CT fusion maximum intensity projection at 24 h on mouse bearing TEM-1-negative tumor (HT-1080; left flank; white arrow) and TEM-1-positive tumor (SK-N-AS; right flank; red arrow).
Figure 4Biodistribution in BALB/c nude mice bearing TEM-1-positive tumor of (a) [64Cu]Cu-4DOTA-1C1m-Fc, group 1; (b) [177Lu]Lu-1DOTA-1C1m-Fc (data from Delage et al. [28]; (c) [177Lu]Lu-3DOTA-1C1m-Fc (data from Delage et al. [27]). The total antibody dose used for this biodistribution was 50 µg. Data are shown as mean ± SD.
Tumor-to-organ ratio of [64Cu]Cu-1C1m-Fc determined by biodistribution of group 1 at 4 h, 24 h and 48 h.
| Ratio | 4 h | 24 h | 48 h |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tumor/Liver | 1.1 | 1.9 | 1.8 |
| Tumor/Spleen | 1.1 | 2.2 | 2.5 |
| Tumor/Blood | 0.6 | 2.5 | 3.6 |
| Tumor/Kidney | 1.3 | 2.5 | 2.6 |
| Tumor/Lungs | 1.1 | 2.8 | 3.3 |
| Tumor/Heart | 1.8 | 5.4 | 5.8 |
| Tumor/Muscle | 7.2 | 8.0 | 7.3 |
| Tumor/Bone | 3.2 | 5.3 | 5.1 |
| Tumor/Small Intestine | 3.6 | 6.0 | 4.9 |
| Tumor/Stomach | 4.3 | 5.0 | 4.5 |
| Tumor/Colon | 3.3 | 4.3 | 3.2 |
| Tumor/Ovaries | 2.0 | 2.7 | 3.6 |
| Tumor/Uterus | 1.2 | 1.6 | 1.4 |
Measured average organ masses and TIAC (only for source organs) and estimated organ doses obtained with the OLINDA/EXM 2.1 software for [64Cu]Cu-1C1m-Fc. Source organs are indicated with *. Absorbed dose estimates using the sphere model of the OLINDA/EXM 2.1 software are labeled with s. The normalized time–activity curves for the considered source organs are presented in the Supplementary Materials (Figure S3).
| Organ | Mean Organ Mass (g) | TIAC (MBq.h/MBq) | Absorbed Dose (mGy/MBq) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | Mean − SD | Mean + SD | Mean | Mean − SD | Mean + SD | ||
| Brain | 30 | 20.7 | 39.3 | ||||
| Large Intestine * | 0.25 | 0.264 | 0.199 | 0.321 | 110 | 81.1 | 137 |
| Small Intestine * | 0.58 | 0.422 | 0.263 | 0.565 | 87.4 | 57.3 | 115 |
| Stomach Wall * | 0.11 | 0.093 | 0.078 | 0.108 | 98.3 | 78.2 | 118 |
| Heart * | 0.14 | 0.182 | 0.169 | 0.194 | 137 | 118 | 155 |
| Kidneys * | 0.27 | 0.569 | 0.535 | 0.601 | 167 | 149 | 184 |
| Liver * | 1.01 | 2.613 | 2.242 | 2.932 | 184 | 152 | 212 |
| Lungs * | 0.14 | 0.328 | 0.248 | 0.407 | 159 | 119 | 198 |
| Pancreas | 38.2 | 27.8 | 48.4 | ||||
| Skeleton | 33.2 | 23.2 | 43 | ||||
| Spleen * | 0.08 | 0.189 | 0.174 | 0.204 | 169 | 149 | 189 |
| Testes | 30.1 | 20.7 | 39.4 | ||||
| Thyroid | 30.8 | 21.2 | 40.3 | ||||
| Urinary Bladder | 30.6 | 21.1 | 40 | ||||
| Total Body | 17.8 | 13.349 | 10.311 | 16.631 | 46.1 | 34.5 | 57.3 |
| Rest of the body * | 15.2 | 7.06 | 4.857 | 9.25 | |||
| Uterus *,s | 0.09 | 0.246 | 0.108 | 0.363 | 178 | 78.4 | 263 |
| Ovaries *,s | 0.04 | 0.054 | 0.034 | 0.073 | 85.1 | 53.6 | 115 |
| Tumor *,s | 0.11 | 0.377 | 0.141 | 0.613 | 225 | 84.2 | 366 |
1: TIAC (only for source organs) and organ-absorbed doses for [177Lu]Lu-1C1m-Fc extrapolated from experimental murine biodistribution data of [64Cu]Cu-1C1m-Fc. Source organs are indicated with *. Absorbed dose estimates using the sphere model of the OLINDA/EXM 2.1 software are labeled with s. 2: Absorbed doses of [177Lu]Lu-1DOTA-1C1m-Fc from experimental data obtained in our previous study [28]. 3: Difference ratio between the estimated absorbed dose and the absorbed dose obtained from biodistribution data of [177Lu]Lu-1DOTA-1C1m-Fc. 4: Absorbed doses of [177Lu]Lu-3DOTA-1C1m-Fc from experimental data obtained in our previous study [27]. 5: Difference ratio between the estimated absorbed dose and the absorbed dose obtained from biodistribution data of [177Lu]Lu-3DOTA-1C1m-Fc.
| Target Organs | 1: [177Lu]Lu-1C1m-Fc TIAC and Absorbed Dose Extrapolation from [64Cu]Cu-1C1m-Fc Biodistribution Data | 2: [177Lu]Lu-1DOTA-1C1m-Fc Absorbed Dose (mGy/MBq) | 3: Difference Ratio between AD1 and AD2 (%) | 4: [177Lu]Lu-3DOTA-1C1m-Fc Absorbed Dose (mGy/MBq) | 5: Difference Ratio between AD1 and AD3 (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TIAC (MBq-h/MBq) | Absorbed Dose (mGy/MBq) AD1 | |||||
| Brain | 485 | 408 | 19 | |||
| Large Intestine * | 2.921 | 1490 | 703 | 112 | 328 | 354 |
| Small Intestine * | 5.844 | 1350 | 577 | 134 | 438 | 208 |
| Stomach Wall * | 0.803 | 1130 | 1660 | −32 | 1150 | −2 |
| Heart * | 0.45 | 904 | 1110 | −19 | 363 | 159 |
| Kidneys * | 1.99 | 1070 | 1320 | −19 | 705 | 52 |
| Liver * | 16.559 | 1630 | 1790 | −9 | 2230 | −27 |
| Lungs * | 0.864 | 976 | 983 | −1 | 539 | 81 |
| Pancreas | 512 | 441 | 16 | |||
| Skeleton | 492 | 418 | 18 | |||
| Spleen * | 0.672 | 1090 | 1180 | −8 | 1200 | −9 |
| Testes | 485 | 409 | 19 | |||
| Thyroid | 486 | 409 | 19 | |||
| Urinary Bladder | 486 | 534 | −9 | |||
| Total Body | 130.205 | 590 | 549 | 7 | ||
| Rest of the body * | 100.102 | |||||
| Uterus *,s | 3.31 | 2890 | 1830 | 58 | 1500 | 93 |
| Ovaries *,s | 0.272 | 570 | 742 | −23 | ||
| Tumor *,s | 5.294 | 3850 | 2530 | 52 | 1820 | 111 |