Literature DB >> 31489569

Biomechanical preparation in primary molars using manual and three NiTi instruments: a cone-beam-computed tomographic in vitro study.

A Manker1, M Solanki2, A Tripathi3, M L Jain4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate nickel-titanium rotary systems, ProTaper Universal (PTU), ProTaper Next (PTN), self-adjusting file (SAF), and stainless steel hand K files in deciduous root canals in longitudinal and horizontal sections by three-dimensional reconstruction. Whether there was any difference in shaping ability, transportation, dentine removal, untouched canal surface area, and preparation time among the different groups when used in primary root canals.
METHODS: Shaping and cleaning of canals in primary molars were done using the four systems, and CBCT and specialized software were used for scanning, image processing, three-dimensional reconstruction, and analysis of pre-operative and post-operative to evaluate the groups for their shaping properties, transportation, amount of dentine removal, untouched canal surface area, and preparation time in primary root canals.
RESULTS: None of the groups reported stripping of canals or instrument failure. SAF demonstrated less removal of dentine as compared to other groups. Hand K files presented with high untouched canal surface area, while it was least with SAF. In addition, rotary files provided faster preparation than hand files, and among the rotary systems, PTN took least time for cleaning and shaping of canals. All the groups were similar in transportation at cervical and apical third.
CONCLUSION: Under the conditions of this study, SAF seemed to result in more conservative and meticulous removal of dentine. This is desirable to preserve the integrity of thin-walled primary root canals. SAF also showed less untouched canal areas suggesting better contact with the primary canal walls. The rotary file groups required less clinical time which is important in paediatric treatments.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Amount of dentine removed; Preparation time; Rotary and manual files in deciduous; Three-dimensional reconstruction analysis; Untouched canal surface areas

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31489569     DOI: 10.1007/s40368-019-00474-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent        ISSN: 1818-6300


  32 in total

1.  Use of nickel-titanium rotary files for root canal preparation in primary teeth.

Authors:  E S Barr; D J Kleier; N V Barr
Journal:  Pediatr Dent       Date:  2000 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.874

2.  Physiological root resorption of primary molars.

Authors:  S A Prove; A L Symons; I A Meyers
Journal:  J Clin Pediatr Dent       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.065

Review 3.  Physiologic root resorption in primary teeth: molecular and histological events.

Authors:  Evlambia Harokopakis-Hajishengallis
Journal:  J Oral Sci       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 1.556

4.  Comparison between rotary and manual instrumentation in primary teeth.

Authors:  S Crespo; O Cortes; C Garcia; L Perez
Journal:  J Clin Pediatr Dent       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.065

5.  'Volumetric analysis of hand and rotary root canal instrumentation and filling in primary teeth using Spiral Computed Tomography' - an invitro study.

Authors:  Parameswarappa Poornima; Patil Disha; Nandanhosur Basavanthappa Nagaveni; KirishettaR Basavaraj Roopa; Kashetty Panchakshari Bharath; Indavara Edagunji Neena
Journal:  Int J Paediatr Dent       Date:  2015-07-04       Impact factor: 3.455

6.  Comparison of the centring ability of the ProTaper™ and ProTaper Universal™ rotary systems for preparing curved root canals.

Authors:  Carlos Menezes Aguiar; Pamella Bezerra Sobrinho; Fabíola Teles; Andréa Cruz Câmara; Jose Antonio Poli de Figueiredo
Journal:  Aust Endod J       Date:  2010-10-24       Impact factor: 1.659

7.  Evaluation of canal transportation and centering ability of K 3 (0.02%) and K 3 (0.04%) with hand K files in primary teeth using spiral computed tomography.

Authors:  Haridoss Selvakumar; Vasanthakumari Anandhan; Eapen Thomas; Kavitha Swaminathan; Rajendran Vijayakumar
Journal:  J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent       Date:  2014 Oct-Dec

8.  Mechanical Preparation Showed Superior Shaping Ability than Manual Technique in Primary Molars - A Micro-Computed Tomography Study.

Authors:  Lídia Regina da Costa Hidalgo; Léa Assed Bezerra da Silva; Graziela Bianchi Leoni; Jardel Francisco Mazzi-Chaves; Emily Eduardo da Silva Carvalho; Alberto Consolaro; Manoel Damião Sousa-Neto
Journal:  Braz Dent J       Date:  2017 Jul-Aug

9.  Evaluation of cleaning capacity and instrumentation time of manual, hybrid and rotary instrumentation techniques in primary molars.

Authors:  S L Pinheiro; G Araujo; I Bincelli; R Cunha; C Bueno
Journal:  Int Endod J       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 5.264

10.  The efficacy of the Self-Adjusting File versus WaveOne in removal of root filling residue that remains in oval canals after the use of ProTaper retreatment files: A cone-beam computed tomography study.

Authors:  Ajinkya M Pawar; Bhagyashree Thakur; Zvi Metzger; Anda Kfir; Mansing Pawar
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb
View more
  3 in total

1.  Comparing the amount of removed dentin thickness in root canal treated primary molar teeth using different instrumentation techniques: in-vitro study using CBCT.

Authors:  Y Ghahramani; N Mohammadi; M Zangooei-Booshehri; S Shirdel
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2021-09-07

2.  Evaluation Time and Efficacy of Root Canal Rotary Preparation in Primary Teeth: An In-Vitro Study.

Authors:  Anas H Bnaiyan; Mohamed K Altinawi; Thuraya Lazkani; Hasan Alzoubi
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-04-28

3.  Three-dimensional analysis of the root canal preparation with Reciproc Blue®, WaveOne Gold® and XP EndoShaper®: a new method in vivo.

Authors:  Javier Caviedes-Bucheli; Nestor Rios-Osorio; Diana Usme; Cristian Jimenez; Adriana Pinzon; Jorge Rincón; María M Azuero-Holguin; Alvaro Zubizarreta-Macho; Jose F Gomez-Sosa; Hugo R Munoz
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 2.757

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.