Literature DB >> 31488919

Item Response Tree Models to Investigate Acquiescence and Extreme Response Styles in Likert-Type Rating Scales.

Minjeong Park1, Amery D Wu1.   

Abstract

Item response tree (IRTree) models are recently introduced as an approach to modeling response data from Likert-type rating scales. IRTree models are particularly useful to capture a variety of individuals' behaviors involving in item responding. This study employed IRTree models to investigate response styles, which are individuals' tendencies to prefer or avoid certain response categories in a rating scale. Specifically, we introduced two types of IRTree models, descriptive and explanatory models, perceived under a larger modeling framework, called explanatory item response models, proposed by De Boeck and Wilson. This extends the typical application of IRTree models for studying response styles. As a demonstration, we applied the descriptive and explanatory IRTree models to examine acquiescence and extreme response styles in Rosenberg's Self-Esteem Scale. Our findings suggested the presence of two distinct extreme response styles and acquiescence response style in the scale.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Likert-type rating scales; acquiescence; disacquiescence; extreme response style; item response tree model

Year:  2019        PMID: 31488919      PMCID: PMC6713983          DOI: 10.1177/0013164419829855

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas        ISSN: 0013-1644            Impact factor:   2.821


  12 in total

1.  Content and style in personality assessment.

Authors:  D N JACKSON; S MESSICK
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1958-07       Impact factor: 17.737

2.  Modeling multiple response processes in judgment and choice.

Authors:  Ulf Böckenholt
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2012-04-30

3.  The stability of individual response styles.

Authors:  Bert Weijters; Maggie Geuens; Niels Schillewaert
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2010-03

4.  Measuring Response Styles Across the Big Five: A Multiscale Extension of an Approach Using Multinomial Processing Trees.

Authors:  Lale Khorramdel; Matthias von Davier
Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res       Date:  2014 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.923

5.  A generalized item response tree model for psychological assessments.

Authors:  Minjeong Jeon; Paul De Boeck
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2016-09

6.  A modular approach for item response theory modeling with the R package flirt.

Authors:  Minjeong Jeon; Frank Rijmen
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2016-06

7.  Dissociating Indifferent, Directional, and Extreme Responding in Personality Data: Applying the Three-Process Model to Self- and Observer Reports.

Authors:  Ingo Zettler; Jonas W B Lang; Ute R Hülsheger; Benjamin E Hilbig
Journal:  J Pers       Date:  2015-04-23

8.  Extracting Response Style Bias From Measures of Positive and Negative Affect in Aging Research.

Authors:  Stefan Schneider
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 4.077

9.  Exploring the effect of a middle response category on response style in attitude measurement.

Authors:  Guy Moors
Journal:  Qual Quant       Date:  2007-02-16

10.  A nonlinear mixed model framework for item response theory.

Authors:  Frank Rijmen; Francis Tuerlinckx; Paul De Boeck; Peter Kuppens
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2003-06
View more
  8 in total

1.  Measuring Response Style Stability Across Constructs With Item Response Trees.

Authors:  Allison J Ames
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 2.821

2.  A Mixture IRTree Model for Extreme Response Style: Accounting for Response Process Uncertainty.

Authors:  Nana Kim; Daniel M Bolt
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2020-04-27       Impact factor: 2.821

3.  Seeing the Forest and the Trees: Comparison of Two IRTree Models to Investigate the Impact of Full Versus Endpoint-Only Response Option Labeling.

Authors:  Elisabeth M Spratto; Brian C Leventhal; Deborah L Bandalos
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2020-05-02       Impact factor: 2.821

4.  Explaining Variability in Response Style Traits: A Covariate-Adjusted IRTree.

Authors:  Allison J Ames; Aaron J Myers
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 3.088

5.  Measuring the Impact of COVID-19 on Mental Health: A Scoping Review of the Existing Scales.

Authors:  Viswa Chaitanya Chandu; Yamuna Marella; Gnana Sarita Panga; Srinivas Pachava; Viswanath Vadapalli
Journal:  Indian J Psychol Med       Date:  2020-08-18

6.  The Scoring Challenge of Emotional Intelligence Ability Tests: A Confirmatory Factor Analysis Approach to Model Substantive and Method Effects Using Raw Item Scores.

Authors:  Veerle E I Huyghe; Arpine Hovasapian; Johnny R J Fontaine
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-03-10

7.  Validity of Three IRT Models for Measuring and Controlling Extreme and Midpoint Response Styles.

Authors:  Yingbin Zhang; Yehui Wang
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-02-21

8.  The Impact of Adaptive Learning in Entrepreneurial Behavior for College Students.

Authors:  Dan Yang
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-02-22
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.