Literature DB >> 26741175

Measuring Response Styles Across the Big Five: A Multiscale Extension of an Approach Using Multinomial Processing Trees.

Lale Khorramdel1, Matthias von Davier2.   

Abstract

This study shows how to address the problem of trait-unrelated response styles (RS) in rating scales using multidimensional item response theory. The aim is to test and correct data for RS in order to provide fair assessments of personality. Expanding on an approach presented by Böckenholt (2012), observed rating data are decomposed into multiple response processes based on a multinomial processing tree. The data come from a questionnaire consisting of 50 items of the International Personality Item Pool measuring the Big Five dimensions administered to 2,026 U.S. students with a 5-point rating scale. It is shown that this approach can be used to test if RS exist in the data and that RS can be differentiated from trait-related responses. Although the extreme RS appear to be unidimensional after exclusion of only 1 item, a unidimensional measure for the midpoint RS is obtained only after exclusion of 10 items. Both RS measurements show high cross-scale correlations and item response theory-based (marginal) reliabilities. Cultural differences could be found in giving extreme responses. Moreover, it is shown how to score rating data to correct for RS after being proved to exist in the data.

Year:  2014        PMID: 26741175     DOI: 10.1080/00273171.2013.866536

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res        ISSN: 0027-3171            Impact factor:   5.923


  12 in total

1.  The Effects of Vignette Scoring on Reliability and Validity of Self-Reports.

Authors:  Matthias von Davier; Hyo-Jeong Shin; Lale Khorramdel; Lazar Stankov
Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas       Date:  2017-09-27

2.  Mountain or Molehill? A Simulation Study on the Impact of Response Styles.

Authors:  Hansjörg Plieninger
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 2.821

3.  Item Response Tree Models to Investigate Acquiescence and Extreme Response Styles in Likert-Type Rating Scales.

Authors:  Minjeong Park; Amery D Wu
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2019-02-15       Impact factor: 2.821

4.  Contextual Responses to Affirmative and/or Reversed-Worded Items.

Authors:  Ulf Böckenholt
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2019-09-04       Impact factor: 2.500

5.  Extreme Response Style and the Measurement of Intra-Individual Variability in Affect.

Authors:  Sien Deng; Danielle E McCarthy; Megan E Piper; Timothy B Baker; Daniel M Bolt
Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 5.923

6.  Using multidimensional item response theory to evaluate how response styles impact measurement.

Authors:  Daniel J Adams; Daniel M Bolt; Sien Deng; Stevens S Smith; Timothy B Baker
Journal:  Br J Math Stat Psychol       Date:  2019-03-28       Impact factor: 3.380

7.  Measuring Response Style Stability Across Constructs With Item Response Trees.

Authors:  Allison J Ames
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 2.821

8.  A Mixture IRTree Model for Extreme Response Style: Accounting for Response Process Uncertainty.

Authors:  Nana Kim; Daniel M Bolt
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2020-04-27       Impact factor: 2.821

9.  Mixture Random-Effect IRT Models for Controlling Extreme Response Style on Rating Scales.

Authors:  Hung-Yu Huang
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-11-02

10.  General mixture item response models with different item response structures: Exposition with an application to Likert scales.

Authors:  Jesper Tijmstra; Maria Bolsinova; Minjeong Jeon
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2018-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.