Literature DB >> 20084107

Exploring the effect of a middle response category on response style in attitude measurement.

Guy Moors1.   

Abstract

In this research we focus on the link between response style behaviour in answering rating data such as Likert scales and the number of response categories that is offered. In a split-ballot experiment two versions of a questionnaire were randomly administered. The questionnaires only differed in the number of response categories, i.e. 5 vs. 6 categories. In both samples a latent-class confirmatory factor analysis revealed an extreme response style factor. The 6-response categories version, however, revealed the more consistent set of effects. As far as the content latent-class factors, i.e. familistic values and ethnocentrism, are concerned, results were fairly similar. However, a somewhat deviant pattern regarding the familistic values items in the 6-response categories version suggested that this set of items is less homogeneous than the set of ethnocentric items. The effect of gender, age and education was also tested and revealed similarities as well as differences between the two samples.

Entities:  

Year:  2007        PMID: 20084107      PMCID: PMC2798975          DOI: 10.1007/s11135-006-9067-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Quant        ISSN: 0033-5177


  2 in total

Review 1.  THE GREAT RESPONSE-STYLE MYTH.

Authors:  L G RORER
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1965-03       Impact factor: 17.737

2.  Yeasayers and naysayers: agreeing response set as a personality variable.

Authors:  A COUCH; K KENISTON
Journal:  J Abnorm Soc Psychol       Date:  1960-03
  2 in total
  9 in total

1.  Measuring Activation in Parents of Youth with Emotional and Behavioral Disorders.

Authors:  Amy L Green; Matthew C Lambert; Kristin Duppong Hurley
Journal:  J Behav Health Serv Res       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 1.505

2.  Public perception of climatological tornado risk in Tennessee, USA.

Authors:  Kelsey N Ellis; Lisa Reyes Mason; Kelly N Gassert; James B Elsner; Tyler Fricker
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2018-08-10       Impact factor: 3.787

3.  Extracting Response Style Bias From Measures of Positive and Negative Affect in Aging Research.

Authors:  Stefan Schneider
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 4.077

4.  Item Response Tree Models to Investigate Acquiescence and Extreme Response Styles in Likert-Type Rating Scales.

Authors:  Minjeong Park; Amery D Wu
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2019-02-15       Impact factor: 2.821

5.  Measuring Response Style Stability Across Constructs With Item Response Trees.

Authors:  Allison J Ames
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 2.821

6.  Mixture Random-Effect IRT Models for Controlling Extreme Response Style on Rating Scales.

Authors:  Hung-Yu Huang
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-11-02

7.  General mixture item response models with different item response structures: Exposition with an application to Likert scales.

Authors:  Jesper Tijmstra; Maria Bolsinova; Minjeong Jeon
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2018-12

8.  An Instrument to Measure Mental Health Professionals' Beliefs and Attitudes towards Service Users' Rights.

Authors:  Francisco José Eiroa-Orosa; Laura Limiñana-Bravo
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-01-16       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Measurement and control of bias in patient reported outcomes using multidimensional item response theory.

Authors:  N Maritza Dowling; Daniel M Bolt; Sien Deng; Chenxi Li
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 4.615

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.