Literature DB >> 20230106

The stability of individual response styles.

Bert Weijters1, Maggie Geuens, Niels Schillewaert.   

Abstract

Modeling capabilities for longitudinal data have progressed considerably, but questions remain on the extent to which method bias may negatively affect the validity of longitudinal survey data. The current study addresses the stability of individual response styles. We set up a longitudinal data collection in which the same respondents filled out 2 online questionnaires with nonoverlapping sets of heterogeneous items. Between data collections, there was a 1-year time gap. We simultaneously modeled 4 response styles that capture the major directional biases in questionnaire responses: acquiescence, disacquiescence, midpoint, and extreme response style. Drawing from latent state-trait theory, we specified a 2nd-order factor model with time-invariant and time-specific response style factors and a specifically designed covariance structure for the residual terms. The results indicate that response styles have an important stable component, a small part of which can be explained by demographics. The meaning and implications of these findings are discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20230106     DOI: 10.1037/a0018721

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Methods        ISSN: 1082-989X


  25 in total

1.  A comparison of four approaches to account for method effects in latent state-trait analyses.

Authors:  Christian Geiser; Ginger Lockhart
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2012-02-06

Review 2.  A Review of the Direct and Interactive Effects of Life Stressors and Dispositional Traits on Youth Psychopathology.

Authors:  Shauna C Kushner
Journal:  Child Psychiatry Hum Dev       Date:  2015-10

3.  Does Acquiescence Affect Individual Items Consistently?

Authors:  Chester Chun Seng Kam; Mingming Zhou
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2014-11-27       Impact factor: 2.821

4.  Further Considerations in Using Items With Diverse Content to Measure Acquiescence.

Authors:  Chester Chun Seng Kam
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2015-05-18       Impact factor: 2.821

5.  A Simulation Study on Methods of Correcting for the Effects of Extreme Response Style.

Authors:  Eunike Wetzel; Jan R Böhnke; Norman Rose
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 2.821

6.  Mountain or Molehill? A Simulation Study on the Impact of Response Styles.

Authors:  Hansjörg Plieninger
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 2.821

7.  Extracting Response Style Bias From Measures of Positive and Negative Affect in Aging Research.

Authors:  Stefan Schneider
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 4.077

8.  Item Response Tree Models to Investigate Acquiescence and Extreme Response Styles in Likert-Type Rating Scales.

Authors:  Minjeong Park; Amery D Wu
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2019-02-15       Impact factor: 2.821

9.  Extreme Response Style and the Measurement of Intra-Individual Variability in Affect.

Authors:  Sien Deng; Danielle E McCarthy; Megan E Piper; Timothy B Baker; Daniel M Bolt
Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 5.923

10.  Global self-esteem and method effects: competing factor structures, longitudinal invariance, and response styles in adolescents.

Authors:  Róbert Urbán; Réka Szigeti; Gyöngyi Kökönyei; Zsolt Demetrovics
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2014-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.