Literature DB >> 31482334

Determinants influencing success rates of myringoplasty in daily practice: a retrospective analysis.

Brett C A van Stekelenburg1, Mark C J Aarts2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine influencing factors on tympanic membrane closure and their consequence on absolute risks of closure and hearing improvement in myringoplasties.
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort.
SETTING: Medium-sized medical centrum. PARTICIPANTS: 195 patients were analysed who underwent a myringoplasty between January 2015 and February 2017 at the Jeroen Bosch Hospital in The Netherlands. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient-related data, descriptions of the tympanic defect, surgical data, and the most important follow-up data were collected. Primary outcome is successful closure of the tympanic membrane and the secondary outcome is the amount of air-bone gap improvement after surgery.
RESULTS: The overall success rate of the myringoplasty graft was 74.9%. If cartilage and butterfly graft were used, higher success rates of 85.4% and 85.5% were achieved compared to temporalis fascia (61.3%). Success rate of the operation was dependent of the skills of the surgeon. Chances of success are 91.9% if the operation is performed by an experienced surgeon using cartilage and 66.7% if a less experienced surgeon uses fascia. If a postoperative complication occurs or when silastic sheets are used, this might have a negative effect on the success of the operation. The mean ABG improved 10.10 dB if the perforation was closed compared to 3.38 dB after an unsuccessful procedure.
CONCLUSION: The success rate of a myringoplasty is dependent of the skills of the surgeon and type of graft used and varies between 91.9 and 52.0% depending on these factors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anatomical success; Comparison; Functional success; Hearing; Myringoplasty; Otological surgical procedure; Tympanic membrane perforation

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31482334     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-019-05611-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  9 in total

1.  The morphology of central tympanic membrane perforations.

Authors:  A Nepal; S Bhandary; S C Mishra; I Singh; P Kumar
Journal:  Nepal Med Coll J       Date:  2007-12

2.  Myringoplasty: impact of perforation size on closure and audiological improvement.

Authors:  J D Wasson; C E Papadimitriou; H Pau
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  2009-01-12       Impact factor: 1.469

Review 3.  [Tympanic membrane perforation and tympanoplasty].

Authors:  S Tringali; C Dubreuil; P Bordure
Journal:  Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac       Date:  2008-09-07

4.  Prospective study of myringoplasty using different approaches.

Authors:  Dinesh Kumar Sharma; Sunder Singh; Barjinder Singh Sohal; Baldev Singh
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2010-01-09

5.  A multivariate analysis of otological, surgical and patient-related factors in determining success in myringoplasty.

Authors:  K Onal; M Z Uguz; K C Kazikdas; S T Gursoy; H Gokce
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.597

6.  Myringoplasty: does the size of the perforation matter?

Authors:  P Lee; G Kelly; R P Mills
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci       Date:  2002-10

7.  Comparative study of sliced tragal cartilage and temporalis fascia in type I tympanoplasty.

Authors:  M M Khan; S R Parab
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 1.469

Review 8.  Comparison of cartilage with temporalis fascia tympanoplasty: A meta-analysis of comparative studies.

Authors:  Mir Mohammad Jalali; Masoud Motasaddi; Ali Kouhi; Sasan Dabiri; Robabeh Soleimani
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 3.325

9.  Study of Various Prognostic Factors Affecting Successful Myringoplasty in a Tertiary Care Centre.

Authors:  Kripa Dangol; Rakesh Prasad Shrivastav
Journal:  Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-11-28
  9 in total
  3 in total

1.  Fungal otitis externa and wet ear with mucopurulent should be influencing factors on tympanic membrane closure.

Authors:  Zhengcai Lou
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-01-25       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Comparison between overlay and underlay primary myringoplasty: retrospective analysis on anatomical and functional results in 497 adult patients

Authors:  Filippo Ricciardiello; Davide Pisani; Gerardo Petruzzi; Pasquale Viola; Remo Palladino; Giulio Sequino; Aldo Falco Raucci; Giovanni Motta; Ciro Coppola; Michele Cavaliere; Alessia Astorina; Claudio Di Nola; Flavia Oliva; Alfonso Scarpa; Giuseppe Chiarella
Journal:  Acta Biomed       Date:  2022-08-31

Review 3.  Comparison of Inlay Cartilage Butterfly and Underlay Temporal Fascia Tympanoplasty.

Authors:  José Faibes Lubianca Neto; Artur Koerig Schuster; João Pedro Neves Lubianca; Roland Douglas Eavey
Journal:  OTO Open       Date:  2022-07-08
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.