Literature DB >> 19134245

Myringoplasty: impact of perforation size on closure and audiological improvement.

J D Wasson1, C E Papadimitriou, H Pau.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the impact of perforation size and other variables on the success of myringoplasty, and also to determine audiological gain following successful closure of tympanic membrane perforations of various sizes. STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of 130 case notes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: (1) Successful closure of tympanic membrane following myringoplasty, in relation to recorded variables (i.e. perforation size, grade of surgeon, surgical technique, graft material, previous myringoplasty and smoking history). (2) Mean, four-frequency, air conduction audiometric gain following successful myringoplasty for various, pre-operatively categorised tympanic membrane perforation sizes. RESULTS AND
CONCLUSION: The collective myringoplasty success rate was 80.8 per cent (105/130); for successful patients, the mean air conduction audiometric gain was -6.8 dB (t = 5.29, p < 0.0001). Neither perforation size nor any other assessed variable was a statistically significant determinant factor for successful myringoplasty. Air conduction audiometric gains following successful myringoplasty were directly correlated with pre-operative perforation size (-4.0 dB for 0-20 per cent perforations, -5.0 dB for 21-40 per cent, -9.1 dB for 41-60 per cent, -10.8 dB for 61-80 per cent and -13.3 dB for 81-100 per cent).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19134245     DOI: 10.1017/S0022215109004368

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Laryngol Otol        ISSN: 0022-2151            Impact factor:   1.469


  6 in total

1.  Factors affecting the treatment outcomes of myringoplasty in patients with small tympanic membrane perforations.

Authors:  Shih-Lung Chen; Shih-Wei Yang
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-08-03       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Determinants influencing success rates of myringoplasty in daily practice: a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Brett C A van Stekelenburg; Mark C J Aarts
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  A comparative study of temporalis fascia graft and vein graft in myringoplasty.

Authors:  Pradipta Kumar Parida; Santhosh Kumar Nochikattil; Gopalakrishnan Surianarayanan; Sunil Kumar Saxena; Sivaraman Ganesan
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2012-03-17

4.  A Comparative Study of the Efficacy of Fat Plug Myringoplasty and Conventional Myringoplasty in Chronic Suppurative Otitis Media with Small Central Perforation.

Authors:  N Dhanapala; B Ramya; L Sudarshan Reddy
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2018-02-03

5.  Study of Various Prognostic Factors Affecting Successful Myringoplasty in a Tertiary Care Centre.

Authors:  Kripa Dangol; Rakesh Prasad Shrivastav
Journal:  Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-11-28

6.  Hearing evaluation after successful myringoplasty.

Authors:  Mohammed Radef Dawood
Journal:  J Otol       Date:  2017-08-18
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.