Literature DB >> 23120654

Prospective study of myringoplasty using different approaches.

Dinesh Kumar Sharma1, Sunder Singh, Barjinder Singh Sohal, Baldev Singh.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Myringoplasty is one of the various surgical techniques for the management of chronic supurative otitis media of tubotympanic type (CSOM-TT). The presence of a perforation of tympanic membrane with intermittent discharge and hearing loss of conductive nature are the indications of myringoplasty. Myringoplasty can be performed by any of the three approaches, i.e. permeatal, endaural, or post-aural. It is a beneficial procedure done for closing tympanic membrane perforation and improving hearing.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare different approaches of myringoplasty and various factors influencing surgical outcome.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Myringoplasty was done in 90 cases of tympanic membrane perforation with temporalis fascia graft by underlay or onlay technique through one of the three approaches, i.e. permeatal, endaural and post-aural.
RESULTS: The overall success rate in this study was 81.11% with majority of patients had improvement in hearing. Statistically there was no significant difference in results with different approaches. Age, sex, site, size and duration of disease had no bearing on graft take in this study.
CONCLUSION: In repairing tympanic membrane perforations similar success rates are achieved with postaural or endaural approaches. A permeatal approach is most limited in the exposure obtained. What is important in choosing the appropriate approach is the location and size of the perforation and size of external auditory canal.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Approach; CSOM; Endaural; Myringoplasty; Permeatal; Postaural

Year:  2010        PMID: 23120654      PMCID: PMC3450083          DOI: 10.1007/s12070-009-0086-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 2231-3796


  6 in total

1.  The principles of plastic surgery of the sound-conducting apparatus.

Authors:  F ZOLLNER
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  1955-10       Impact factor: 1.469

2.  Theory and practice of tympanoplasty.

Authors:  H WULLSTEIN
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1956-08       Impact factor: 3.325

3.  Tympanoplasty: Factors influencing surgical outcome.

Authors:  S A Al-Ghamdi
Journal:  Ann Saudi Med       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 1.526

4.  Myringoplasty in children: factors influencing surgical outcome.

Authors:  R Caylan; A Titiz; M Falcioni; G De Donato; A Russo; A Taibah; M Sanna
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 3.497

5.  Day case myringoplasty using tragal perichondrium.

Authors:  M S Quraishi; N S Jones
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci       Date:  1995-02

6.  Myringoplasty. A review of 472 cases.

Authors:  J L Sheehy; R G Anderson
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1980 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.547

  6 in total
  4 in total

1.  Determinants influencing success rates of myringoplasty in daily practice: a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Brett C A van Stekelenburg; Mark C J Aarts
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 2.  Indian Perspectives on Graft Materials Used for Repair of Tympanic Membrane.

Authors:  Manu Malhotra; Saurabh Varshney; Rashmi Malhotra; Poonam Joshi
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-07-01

3.  Effect of Type 1 Tympanoplasty on the Quality of Life of CSOM Patients.

Authors:  Khyati Bhatia; Lakshmi Vaid; H C Taneja
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2016-05-09

4.  Comparison of permeatal medial placement of graft without raising the tympano-meatal flaps to conventional methods of myringoplasty: An experience at tertiary care hospital in Pakistan.

Authors:  Saleem Asif Niazi; Zaheer Ul Hassan; Khaula Atif; Saeed Ullah
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.088

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.