Literature DB >> 12383291

Myringoplasty: does the size of the perforation matter?

P Lee1, G Kelly, R P Mills.   

Abstract

Does the size of a tympanic membrane defect influence the success rate in myringoplasty? Many studies which have suggested that size does not affect results have included only small numbers of patients. After a power analysis to identify the size of groups needed to detect a clinically significant difference between the success rate of small and large perforations, a retrospective study was carried out to answer the question. A retrospective study of 423 myringoplasty-only operations showed that size does influence success; the success rate for small perforations was 74.1% compared with 56.0% for large perforations (P = 0.0003). Size also influences the change in four-frequency air conduction thresholds (small perforations +7.2 dB, large perforations +10.2 dB; t = 2.08, P = 0.039) in successful myringoplasties, a positive value indicating an improvement in hearing. This change is unlikely to be clinically significant. Patients should be made aware of these facts when informed consent is being obtained.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12383291     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2273.2002.00590.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci        ISSN: 0307-7772


  28 in total

1.  [Prevalence of chronic tympanic membrane perforation in the adult population].

Authors:  H Kaftan; M Noack; N Friedrich; H Völzke; W Hosemann
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  Treatment of Large Tympanic Membrane Perforations: Medial to Malleus Versus Lateral to Malleus.

Authors:  Erkan Kulduk; Rıza Dundar; Fatih Kemal Soy; Osman Kadir Guler; Ahmet Yukkaldiran; Ismail Iynen; Ferhat Bozkus
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2015-04-28

3.  Response to the letter to the editor regarding "Comparison of the anatomic and hearing outcomes of cartilage type 1 tympanoplasty in pediatric and adult patients".

Authors:  Mahmut Sinan Yilmaz
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  [Functional and audiological results of tympanoplasty type I using pure perichondrial grafts].

Authors:  A Haisch; J Harder; W Hopfenmüller; B Sedlmaier
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.284

5.  Comparative Study of Two Different Myringoplasty Techniques in Mucosal Type of Chronic Otitis Media.

Authors:  Mallikarjunappa Ajjampura Murugendrappa; Prakash Naganahalli Siddappa; Abhilash Shambulingegowda; Girish Pattanada Basavaraj
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-02-01

6.  Determinants influencing success rates of myringoplasty in daily practice: a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Brett C A van Stekelenburg; Mark C J Aarts
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Outcome of Interlay Grafting in Type 1 Tympanoplasty for Large Central Perforation.

Authors:  B C Patil; P R Misale; R S Mane; A A Mohite
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2014-06-24

8.  Myringoplasty Quality Control Is Necessary: Comparison of Surgical Results of Two Consecutive Series in A Single Institution.

Authors:  Matti Iso-Mustajärvi; Aarno Dietz; Heikki Löppönen
Journal:  J Int Adv Otol       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 1.017

9.  Study of the Etiological Factors of Failures of Myringoplasty: A Observational Study.

Authors:  Sushil K Sharma; Dinesh Kumar; Ramsiya Singh; Ved P Upadhyay; Abhishek K Dubey
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2019-04-06

10.  Myringoplasty: Impact of Size and Site of Perforation on the Success Rate.

Authors:  Arindam Das; Bhavika Sen; Debashish Ghosh; Arunabha Sengupta
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2014-12-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.