Literature DB >> 12671351

Burst fracture in the metastatically involved spine: development, validation, and parametric analysis of a three-dimensional poroelastic finite-element model.

Cari M Whyne1, Serena S Hu, Jeffery C Lotz.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A finite-element study and in vitro experimental validation was performed for a parametric investigation of features that contribute to burst fracture risk in the metastatically involved spine.
OBJECTIVES: To develop and validate a three-dimensional poroelastic model of a metastatically compromised vertebral segment, to evaluate the effect of lytic lesions on vertebral strains and pressures, and to determine the influence of loading and motion segment status (bone density, pedicle involvement, disc degeneration, and tumor size) on the relative risk of burst fracture initiation. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Finite-element analysis has been used successfully to predict failure loads and fracture patterns for bone. Although models for vertebra affected with tumors have been presented, these have not been thoroughly validated experimentally. Consequently, their predictive capabilities remain uncertain.
METHODS: A three-dimensional poroelastic finite-element model of the first lumbar vertebra and adjacent intervertebral discs, including a tumor of variable size, was developed. To validate the model, 12 cadaver spinal motion segments were tested in axial compression, in intact condition, and with simulated osteolytic defects. Features of the validated model were parametrically varied to investigate the effects of tumor size, trabecular bone density, pedicle involvement, applied loads, loading rates, and disc degeneration using outcome variables of vertebral bulge and vertebral axial deformation.
RESULTS: Consistent trends between the experimental data and model predictions were observed. Overall, the model results suggest that tumor size contributes most toward the risk of initiating burst fracture, followed by the applied load magnitude and bone density.
CONCLUSIONS: The parametric analysis suggests that the principal factors affecting the initiation of burst fracture in metastatically affected vertebrae are tumor size, magnitude of spinal loading, and bone density. Consequently, patient-specific measures of these factors should be factored into decisions regarding clinical prophylaxis. Pedicle involvement or disc degeneration was less important according to the outcome measures in this study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12671351     DOI: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000051910.97211.BA

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  16 in total

Review 1.  Fracture risk assessment and clinical decision making for patients with metastatic bone disease.

Authors:  Timothy A Damron; Kenneth A Mann
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2020-03-23       Impact factor: 3.494

2.  A new material mapping procedure for quantitative computed tomography-based, continuum finite element analyses of the vertebra.

Authors:  Ginu U Unnikrishnan; Elise F Morgan
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 2.097

3.  A 3D finite element model of prophylactic vertebroplasty in the metastatic spine: Vertebral stability and stress distribution on adjacent vertebrae.

Authors:  Alessandra Berton; Giuseppe Salvatore; Hugo Giambini; Mauro Ciuffreda; Umile Giuseppe Longo; Vincenzo Denaro; Andrew Thoreson; Kai-Nan An
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 1.985

4.  Biomechanical evaluation of an injectable and biodegradable copolymer P(PF-co-CL) in a cadaveric vertebral body defect model.

Authors:  Zhong Fang; Hugo Giambini; Heng Zeng; Jon J Camp; Mahrokh Dadsetan; Richard A Robb; Kai-Nan An; Michael J Yaszemski; Lichun Lu
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2014-01-10       Impact factor: 3.845

Review 5.  Tumors of the osseous spine.

Authors:  Narayan Sundaresan; Stephano Boriani; Allen Rothman; Robert Holtzman
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2004 Aug-Sep       Impact factor: 4.130

6.  Comparison of the effect of two different bone-targeted radiofrequency ablation (RFA) systems alone and in combination with percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) on the biomechanical stability of the metastatic spine.

Authors:  Padina S Pezeshki; Sean Davidson; Kieran Murphy; Claire McCann; Elzbieta Slodkowska; Michael Sherar; Albert Jm Yee; Cari M Whyne
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-07-24       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  A dynamic investigation of the burst fracture process using a combined experimental and finite element approach.

Authors:  R K Wilcox; D J Allen; R M Hall; D Limb; D C Barton; R A Dickson
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-01-09       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  The effect of pre-vertebroplasty tumor ablation using laser-induced thermotherapy on biomechanical stability and cement fill in the metastatic spine.

Authors:  Henry Ahn; Payam Mousavi; Lee Chin; Sandra Roth; Joel Finkelstein; Alex Vitken; Cari Whyne
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-04-20       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Biomechanics of thoracolumbar junction vertebral fractures from various kinematic conditions.

Authors:  Léo Fradet; Yvan Petit; Eric Wagnac; Carl-Eric Aubin; Pierre-Jean Arnoux
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 2.602

10.  Mechanical testing setups affect spine segment fracture outcomes.

Authors:  Asghar Rezaei; Hugo Giambini; Kent D Carlson; Hao Xu; Susheil Uthamaraj; Dan Dragomir-Daescu; Michael J Yaszemski; Lichun Lu
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2019-08-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.