Literature DB >> 31473786

Deployment of flow diverter devices: prediction of foreshortening and validation of the simulation in 18 clinical cases.

Robert Kellermann1, Steffen Serowy2, Oliver Beuing1, Martin Skalej1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Flow diverter (FD) devices show severe shortening during deployment in dependency of the vessel geometry. Valid information regarding the geometry of the targeted vessel is therefore mandatory for correct device selection, and to avoid complications. But the geometry of diseased tortuous intracranial vessels cannot be measured accurately with standard methods. The goal of this study is to prove the accuracy of a novel virtual stenting method in prediction of the behavior of a FD in an individual vessel geometry.
METHODS: We applied a virtual stenting method on angiographic 3D imaging data of the specific vasculature of patients, who underwent FD treatment. The planning tool analyzes the local vessel morphology and deploys the FD virtually. We measured in 18 cases the difference between simulated FD length and real FD length after treatment in a landmark-based registration of pre-/post-interventional 3D angiographic datasets.
RESULTS: The mean value of length deviation of the virtual FD was 2.2 mm (SD ± 1.9 mm) equaling 9.5% (SD ± 8.2%). Underestimated cases present lower deviations compared with overestimated FDs. Flow diverter cases with a nominal device length of 20 mm had the highest prediction accuracy.
CONCLUSION: The results suggest that the virtual stenting method used in this study is capable of predicting FD length with a clinically sufficient accuracy in advance and could therefore be a helpful tool in intervention planning. Imaging data of high quality are mandatory, while processing and manipulation of the FD during the intervention may impact the accuracy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Flow diverter; Intracranial aneurysm; Virtual stenting

Year:  2019        PMID: 31473786     DOI: 10.1007/s00234-019-02287-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroradiology        ISSN: 0028-3940            Impact factor:   2.804


  20 in total

Review 1.  Endovascular treatment of cerebral aneurysms using flow-diverter devices: A systematic review.

Authors:  Francesco Briganti; Giuseppe Leone; Mariano Marseglia; Giuseppe Mariniello; Ferdinando Caranci; Arturo Brunetti; Francesco Maiuri
Journal:  Neuroradiol J       Date:  2015-08-27

2.  Retrograde trans-posterior communicating artery snare-assisted rescue of lost access to a foreshortened pipeline embolization device: complication management.

Authors:  Erik F Hauck; Sabareesh K Natarajan; David J Langer; L Nelson Hopkins; Adnan H Siddiqui; Elad I Levy
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.654

3.  Computation of the change in length of a braided device when deployed in realistic vessel models.

Authors:  Hector Fernandez; Juan M Macho; Jordi Blasco; Luis San Roman; Werner Mailaender; Luis Serra; Ignacio Larrabide
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 2.924

4.  Comparison of Pipeline Embolization Device Sizing Based on Conventional 2D Measurements and Virtual Simulation Using the Sim&Size Software: An Agreement Study.

Authors:  J M Ospel; G Gascou; V Costalat; L Piergallini; K A Blackham; D W Zumofen
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2019-02-07       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  Computer modeling of deployment and mechanical expansion of neurovascular flow diverter in patient-specific intracranial aneurysms.

Authors:  Ding Ma; Gary F Dargush; Sabareesh K Natarajan; Elad I Levy; Adnan H Siddiqui; Hui Meng
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Stents and flow diverters in the treatment of aneurysms: device deformation in vivo may alter porosity and impact efficacy.

Authors:  Fabrice Bing; Tim E Darsaut; Igor Salazkin; Alina Makoyeva; Guylaine Gevry; Jean Raymond
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2012-08-16       Impact factor: 2.804

7.  Virtual stenting workflow with vessel-specific initialization and adaptive expansion for neurovascular stents and flow diverters.

Authors:  Nikhil Paliwal; Hongyu Yu; Jinhui Xu; Jianping Xiang; Adnan Siddiqui; Xinjian Yang; Haiyun Li; Hui Meng
Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 1.763

8.  Effects of flow-diverting device oversizing on hemodynamics alteration in cerebral aneurysms.

Authors:  F Mut; J R Cebral
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-05-03       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 9.  Flow-diversion panacea or poison?

Authors:  Mario Zanaty; Nohra Chalouhi; Stavropoula I Tjoumakaris; Robert H Rosenwasser; L Fernando Gonzalez; Pascal Jabbour
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 4.003

10.  Comparison and calibration of a real-time virtual stenting algorithm using Finite Element Analysis and Genetic Algorithms.

Authors:  K Spranger; C Capelli; G M Bosi; S Schievano; Y Ventikos
Journal:  Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng       Date:  2015-08-15       Impact factor: 6.756

View more
  2 in total

1.  Retrospective analysis of intracranial aneurysms after flow diverter treatment including color-coded imaging (syngo iFlow) as a predictor of aneurysm occlusion.

Authors:  Andreas Simgen; Christine Mayer; Michael Kettner; Ruben Mühl-Benninghaus; Wolfgang Reith; Umut Yilmaz
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 1.764

2.  Cerebral Aneurysm Occlusion at 12-Month Follow-Up After Flow-Diverter Treatment: Statistical Modeling for V&V With Real-World Data.

Authors:  Ana Paula Narata; Laura Obradó; Raquel Kalé Moyano; Juan M Macho; Jordi Blasco; Antonio López Rueda; Luis San Roman; Sebastian Remollo; Claudia Marinelli; Rosana Cepeda; Héctor Fernández; Ignacio Larrabide
Journal:  Front Med Technol       Date:  2021-09-17
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.