Literature DB >> 36073216

[A discrimination model for differentiation of renal cell carcinoma from renal angiomyolipoma without visible fat: based on hierarchical fusion framework of multi-classifier].

T Mo1, Y Wu1, R Yang2, X Zhen3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the capabilities of classification models based on hierarchical fusion framework of multi-classifier using a random projection strategy for differentiation of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) from small renal angiomyolipoma (< 4 cm) without visible fat (AMLwvf).
METHODS: We retrospectively collected the clinical data from 163 patients with pathologically proven small renal mass, including 118 with RCC and 45 with AMLwvf.Target region of interest (ROI) delineation was performed on an unenhanced phase (UP) CT image slice displaying the largest lesion area.The radiomics features were used to establish a hierarchical fusion method.On the projection-based level, the homogeneous classifiers were fused, and the fusion results were further fused at the classifier-based level to construct a multi-classifier fusion system based on random projection for differentiation of AMLwvf and RCC.The discriminative capability of this model was quantitatively evaluated using 5-fold cross validation and 4 evaluation indexes[specificity, sensitivity, accuracy and area under ROC curve (AUC)].We quantitatively compared this multi-classifier fusion framework against different classification models using a single classifier and several multi-classifier ensemble models.
RESULTS: When the projection number was set at 10, the proposed hierarchical fusion differentiation framework achieved the best results on all the evaluation measurements.At the optimal projection number of 10, the specificity, sensitivity, average accuracy and AUC of the multi-classifier ensemble classification system for differentiation between AMLwvf and RCC were 0.853, 0.693, 0.809 and 0.870, respectively.
CONCLUSION: The proposed model constructed based on a multi-classifier fusion system using random projection shows better performance to differentiate RCC from AMLwvf than the AMLwvf and RCC discrimination models based on a single classification algorithm and the currently available benchmark ensemble methods.

Entities:  

Keywords:  hierarchical fusion framework; multi-classifier; random projection; renal angiomyolipoma without visible fat; renal cell carcinoma

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 36073216      PMCID: PMC9458537          DOI: 10.12122/j.issn.1673-4254.2022.08.09

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao        ISSN: 1673-4254


  12 in total

1.  Prediction of Benign and Malignant Solid Renal Masses: Machine Learning-Based CT Texture Analysis.

Authors:  Cagri Erdim; Aytul Hande Yardimci; Ceyda Turan Bektas; Burak Kocak; Sevim Baykal Koca; Hale Demir; Ozgur Kilickesmez
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 3.173

2.  Diagnosis of angiomyolipoma using computed tomography-region of interest < or =-10 HU or 4 adjacent pixels < or =-10 HU are recommended as the diagnostic thresholds.

Authors:  E Simpson; U Patel
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.350

3.  Lipid-poor renal angiomyolipoma: Differentiation from clear cell renal cell carcinoma using wash-in and washout characteristics on contrast-enhanced computed tomography.

Authors:  Pingkun Xie; Zhihui Yang; Zheng Yuan
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 2.967

4.  CT histogram analysis: differentiation of angiomyolipoma without visible fat from renal cell carcinoma at CT imaging.

Authors:  Ji Yeon Kim; Jeong Kon Kim; Namkug Kim; Kyoung-Sik Cho
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-12-19       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Pixel distribution analysis: can it be used to distinguish clear cell carcinomas from angiomyolipomas with minimal fat?

Authors:  Onofrio A Catalano; Anthony E Samir; Dushyant V Sahani; Peter F Hahn
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-04-15       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Angiomyolipoma with minimal fat: differentiation of morphological and enhancement features from renal cell carcinoma at CT imaging.

Authors:  Chang Kyu Sung; See Hyung Kim; Sungmin Woo; Min Hoan Moon; Sang Youn Kim; Seung Hyup Kim; Jeong Yeon Cho
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  2015-12-11       Impact factor: 1.990

7.  Angiomyolipoma with minimal fat on MDCT: can counts of negative-attenuation pixels aid diagnosis?

Authors:  Claus Simpfendorfer; Brian R Herts; Gaspar A Motta-Ramirez; Daniel S Lockwood; Ming Zhou; Michael Leiber; Erick M Remer
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  Computational Radiomics System to Decode the Radiographic Phenotype.

Authors:  Joost J M van Griethuysen; Andriy Fedorov; Chintan Parmar; Ahmed Hosny; Nicole Aucoin; Vivek Narayan; Regina G H Beets-Tan; Jean-Christophe Fillion-Robin; Steve Pieper; Hugo J W L Aerts
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  Investigating rectal toxicity associated dosimetric features with deformable accumulated rectal surface dose maps for cervical cancer radiotherapy.

Authors:  Jiawei Chen; Haibin Chen; Zichun Zhong; Zhuoyu Wang; Brian Hrycushko; Linghong Zhou; Steve Jiang; Kevin Albuquerque; Xuejun Gu; Xin Zhen
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 3.481

10.  A Deep Learning-Based Radiomics Model for Differentiating Benign and Malignant Renal Tumors.

Authors:  Leilei Zhou; Zuoheng Zhang; Yu-Chen Chen; Zhen-Yu Zhao; Xin-Dao Yin; Hong-Bing Jiang
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2018-12-17       Impact factor: 4.243

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.