Teele Kuusk1,2, Joana B Neves2, Maxine Tran2,3, Axel Bex4,5,6. 1. Urology Department, Darent Valley Hospital, Dartford and Gravesham NHS Trust, Dartford, UK. 2. Specialist Centre for Kidney Cancer, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK. 3. UCL Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, London, UK. 4. Specialist Centre for Kidney Cancer, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK. a.bex@nki.nl. 5. UCL Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, London, UK. a.bex@nki.nl. 6. Surgical Oncology Division, Urology Department, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. a.bex@nki.nl.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Radiomics is a specific field of medical research that uses programmable recognition tools to extract objective information from standard images to combine with clinical data, with the aim of improving diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive accuracy beyond standard visual interpretation. We performed a narrative review of radiomic applications that may support improved characterization of small renal masses (SRM). The main focus of the review was to identify and discuss methods which may accurately differentiate benign from malignant renal masses, specifically between renal cell carcinoma (RCC) subtypes and from angiomyolipoma without visible fat (fat-poor AML) and oncocytoma. Furthermore, prediction of grade, sarcomatoid features, and gene mutations would be of importance in terms of potential clinical utility in prognostic stratification and selecting personalised patient management strategies. METHODS: A detailed search of original articles was performed using the PubMed-MEDLINE database until 20 September 2020 to identify the English literature relevant to radiomics applications in renal tumour assessment. In total, 42 articles were included in the analysis in 3 main categories related to SRM: prediction of benign versus malignant SRM, subtypes, and nuclear grade, and other features of aggressiveness. CONCLUSION: Overall, studies reported the superiority of radiomics over expert radiological assessment, but were mainly of retrospective design and therefore of low-quality evidence. However, it is clear that radiomics is an attractive modality that has the potential to improve the non-invasive diagnostic accuracy of SRM imaging and prediction of its natural behaviour. Further prospective validation studies of radiomics are needed to augment management algorithms of SRM.
PURPOSE: Radiomics is a specific field of medical research that uses programmable recognition tools to extract objective information from standard images to combine with clinical data, with the aim of improving diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive accuracy beyond standard visual interpretation. We performed a narrative review of radiomic applications that may support improved characterization of small renal masses (SRM). The main focus of the review was to identify and discuss methods which may accurately differentiate benign from malignant renal masses, specifically between renal cell carcinoma (RCC) subtypes and from angiomyolipoma without visible fat (fat-poor AML) and oncocytoma. Furthermore, prediction of grade, sarcomatoid features, and gene mutations would be of importance in terms of potential clinical utility in prognostic stratification and selecting personalised patient management strategies. METHODS: A detailed search of original articles was performed using the PubMed-MEDLINE database until 20 September 2020 to identify the English literature relevant to radiomics applications in renal tumour assessment. In total, 42 articles were included in the analysis in 3 main categories related to SRM: prediction of benign versus malignant SRM, subtypes, and nuclear grade, and other features of aggressiveness. CONCLUSION: Overall, studies reported the superiority of radiomics over expert radiological assessment, but were mainly of retrospective design and therefore of low-quality evidence. However, it is clear that radiomics is an attractive modality that has the potential to improve the non-invasive diagnostic accuracy of SRM imaging and prediction of its natural behaviour. Further prospective validation studies of radiomics are needed to augment management algorithms of SRM.
Authors: Hiten D Patel; Paige E Nichols; Zhuo Tony Su; Mohit Gupta; Joseph G Cheaib; Mohamad E Allaf; Phillip M Pierorazio Journal: Urology Date: 2019-09-16 Impact factor: 2.649
Authors: Kristen McAlpine; Rodney H Breau; Dawn Stacey; Christopher Knee; Michael A S Jewett; Philippe D Violette; Patrick O Richard; Ilias Cagiannos; Christopher Morash; Luke T Lavallée Journal: Can Urol Assoc J Date: 2020-06-16 Impact factor: 1.862
Authors: Joana B Neves; John Withington; Sarah Fowler; Prasad Patki; Ravi Barod; Faiz Mumtaz; Tim O'Brien; Michael Aitchison; Axel Bex; Maxine G B Tran Journal: BJU Int Date: 2018-03-02 Impact factor: 5.588
Authors: Lorenzo Marconi; Saeed Dabestani; Thomas B Lam; Fabian Hofmann; Fiona Stewart; John Norrie; Axel Bex; Karim Bensalah; Steven E Canfield; Milan Hora; Markus A Kuczyk; Axel S Merseburger; Peter F A Mulders; Thomas Powles; Michael Staehler; Borje Ljungberg; Alessandro Volpe Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2015-08-29 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Charles Asselin; Antonio Finelli; Rodney H Breau; Ranjeeta Mallick; Anil Kapoor; Ricardo A Rendon; Simon Tanguay; Frédéric Pouliot; Adrian Fairey; Luke T Lavallée; Franck Bladou; Jun Kawakami; Alan I So; Patrick O Richard Journal: Urol Oncol Date: 2020-07-18 Impact factor: 3.498
Authors: N Schieda; R S Lim; M D F McInnes; I Thomassin; R Renard-Penna; S Tavolaro; F H Cornelis Journal: Diagn Interv Imaging Date: 2018-03-30 Impact factor: 4.026
Authors: Stephan Ursprung; Lucian Beer; Annemarie Bruining; Ramona Woitek; Grant D Stewart; Ferdia A Gallagher; Evis Sala Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2020-02-14 Impact factor: 5.315