Literature DB >> 31462551

Frequency and Characteristics of Biological False-Positive Test Results for Syphilis Reported in Florida and New York City, USA, 2013 to 2017.

James Matthias1,2, Ellen J Klingler3, Julia A Schillinger4,3, Gayle Keller2, Craig Wilson2, Thomas A Peterman4.   

Abstract

Discordant syphilis test results, with a reactive nontreponemal test and nonreactive treponemal test are usually considered biological false-positive test results (BFPs), which can be attributed to other conditions. Syphilis surveillance laws mandate laboratory reporting of reactive syphilis tests, which include many BFPs. We describe the frequency of BFPs, titer distributions, and titer increases from reported test results in Florida and New York City (NYC). Reactive nontreponemal tests for individuals with at least one nonreactive treponemal test and no reactive treponemal test were extracted from sexually transmitted disease (STD) surveillance systems in Florida and NYC from 2013 to 2017. Characteristics of individuals with BFPs were analyzed after selecting the observation with the highest titer from each individual. We next considered all results from individuals to characterize persons who had a 4-fold titer increase between successive nontreponemal tests. Among 526,540 reactive nontreponemal tests, there were 57,580 BFPs (11%) from 39,920 individuals. Over 90% (n = 52,330) of BFPs were low titer (≤1:4), but 654 (1%) were high-titer BFPs (≥1:32). Very high-titer (≥1:128) BFPs were more common among individuals over 60 years of age (odds ratio [OR], 2.68; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.22 to 5.91). A 4-fold increase in titer was observed among 1,863 (14%) individuals with more than one reported BFP. Most BFPs detected by surveillance were low titer, but some were high titer and some had a 4-fold increase in titer. Review of patient histories might identify underlying conditions contributing to these high and rising titers.
Copyright © 2019 American Society for Microbiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biological false positive; epidemiology; nontreponemal; public health; surveillance studies; syphilis

Year:  2019        PMID: 31462551      PMCID: PMC6813008          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.00898-19

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  28 in total

1.  False-positive reaction to VDRL test with prozone phenomena. Association with lymphosarcoma.

Authors:  K D Wuepper; D L Tuffanelli
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1966-03-07       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Direct comparison of the traditional and reverse syphilis screening algorithms in a population with a low prevalence of syphilis.

Authors:  Matthew J Binnicker; Deborah J Jespersen; Leonard O Rollins
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Hepatitis C virus infection and biological false-positive syphilis tests.

Authors:  M Augenbraun; A French; M Glesby; L Sanchez-Keeland; M Young; R Greenblatt; A Sharma
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.519

4.  Benefits and barriers to electronic laboratory results reporting for notifiable diseases: the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene experience.

Authors:  Trang Quyen Nguyen; Lorna Thorpe; Hadi A Makki; Farzad Mostashari
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2007-04-05       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Biological false-positive tests comprise a high proportion of Venereal Disease Research Laboratory reactions in an analysis of 300,000 sera.

Authors:  Alexandra Geusau; Harald Kittler; Ulrike Hein; Edda Dangl-Erlach; Georg Stingl; Erwin Tschachler
Journal:  Int J STD AIDS       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 1.359

6.  Evaluation of positive and false-positive results in syphilis screening of blood donors in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Authors:  V S Sandes; S G C Silva; I J F Motta; L G C Velarde; S R de Castilho
Journal:  Transfus Med       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 2.019

7.  Reinfections during the Florida syphilis epidemic, 2000-2008.

Authors:  Toye H Brewer; Thomas A Peterman; Daniel R Newman; Karla Schmitt
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 2.830

8.  Reactor Grids for Prioritizing Syphilis Investigations: Are Primary Syphilis Cases Being Missed?

Authors:  Susan Cha; James M Matthias; Mohammad Rahman; Julia A Schillinger; Bruce W Furness; River A Pugsley; Sarah Kidd; Kyle T Bernstein; Thomas A Peterman
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 2.830

9.  Biological false positive serological tests for syphilis in the Jamaican population.

Authors:  M F Smikle; O B James; P Prabhakar
Journal:  Genitourin Med       Date:  1990-04

10.  Managing Syphilis in the HIV-infected Patient.

Authors:  Christopher S. Hall; Jeffrey D. Klausner; Gail A. Bolan
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.663

View more
  3 in total

1.  Point-of-Care Diagnostics for Diagnosis of Active Syphilis Infection: Needs, Challenges and the Way Forward.

Authors:  Minh D Pham; Jason J Ong; David A Anderson; Heidi E Drummer; Mark Stoové
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-07-04       Impact factor: 4.614

2.  Seroprevalence of Transfusion Transmissible Infections and Associated Risk Factors in Hospitalized Patients before Transfusion in Jinling Hospital Nanjing University: A Three-Year Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Wei Wang; Xiaojun Kong; Guangchao Zhao; Xuelian Huang; Jun Yuan; Na Li; Xiaonan Zhang; Kaiyun Luo; Jianfeng Luan; Xuzhou Fan
Journal:  Pathogens       Date:  2022-06-20

3.  Syphilitic Reinfections During the Same Pregnancy-Florida, 2018.

Authors:  James Matthias; Ruth Sanon; Virginia B Bowen; Emma C Spencer; Thomas A Peterman
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 3.868

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.