Literature DB >> 22090407

Direct comparison of the traditional and reverse syphilis screening algorithms in a population with a low prevalence of syphilis.

Matthew J Binnicker1, Deborah J Jespersen, Leonard O Rollins.   

Abstract

We describe the first direct comparison of the reverse and traditional syphilis screening algorithms in a population with a low prevalence of syphilis. Among 1,000 patients tested, the results for 6 patients were falsely reactive by reverse screening, compared to none by traditional testing. However, reverse screening identified 2 patients with possible latent syphilis that were not detected by rapid plasma reagin (RPR).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22090407      PMCID: PMC3256685          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.05636-11

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  5 in total

1.  The laboratory impact of changing syphilis screening from the rapid-plasma reagin to a treponemal enzyme immunoassay: a case-study from the Greater Toronto Area.

Authors:  Sharmistha Mishra; Marie-Claude Boily; Victoria Ng; Wayne L Gold; Tom Okura; Marsha Shaw; Tony Mazzulli; David N Fisman
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 2.830

2.  Discordant results from reverse sequence syphilis screening--five laboratories, United States, 2006-2010.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2011-02-11       Impact factor: 17.586

Review 3.  Novel Treponema pallidum serologic tests: a paradigm shift in syphilis screening for the 21st century.

Authors:  Arlene C Seña; Becky L White; P Frederick Sparling
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 9.079

4.  Evaluation of the Bio-Rad BioPlex 2200 syphilis multiplex flow immunoassay for the detection of IgM- and IgG-class antitreponemal antibodies.

Authors:  E Gomez; D J Jespersen; J A Harring; M J Binnicker
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2010-04-28

5.  Syphilis testing algorithms using treponemal tests for initial screening--four laboratories, New York City, 2005-2006.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 17.586

  5 in total
  32 in total

1.  It is time to use treponema-specific antibody screening tests for diagnosis of syphilis.

Authors:  Michael J Loeffelholz; Matthew J Binnicker
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Evaluation of rapid syphilis tests in KwaZulu-Natal.

Authors:  Nomonde Ritta Dlamini; Rogerio Phili; Cathy Connolly
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2014-01-02       Impact factor: 2.352

Review 3.  Syphilis testing in blood donors: an update.

Authors:  Gagandeep Kaur; Paramjit Kaur
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2014-11-21       Impact factor: 3.443

4.  Evaluation of the Vitros Syphilis TPA chemiluminescence immunoassay as a first-line method for reverse syphilis screening.

Authors:  Victoria González; Gema Fernández; Eva Dopico; Nuria Margall; Juliana Esperalba; Carme Muñoz; Elisabeth Castro; Elena Sulleiro; Lurdes Matas
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2015-01-21       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Evaluation of the boson chemiluminescence immunoassay as a first-line screening test in the ECDC algorithm for syphilis serodiagnosis in a population with a high prevalence of syphilis.

Authors:  Xin-Hui Qiu; Ya-Feng Zhang; Yu-Yan Chen; Qiao Zhang; Fu-Yi Chen; Long Liu; Jin-Yi Fan; Kun Gao; Xiao-Zhen Zhu; Wei-Hong Zheng; Hui-Lin Zhang; Li-Rong Lin; Li-Li Liu; Man-Li Tong; Chang-Gong Zhang; Jian-Jun Niu; Tian-Ci Yang
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Clinical Performance of the BioPlex 2200 Syphilis Total & RPR Assay at a Tertiary Medical Center with a High Rate of Syphilis.

Authors:  Merih T Tesfazghi; Neil W Anderson; Ann M Gronowski; Melanie L Yarbrough
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Frequency and Characteristics of Biological False-Positive Test Results for Syphilis Reported in Florida and New York City, USA, 2013 to 2017.

Authors:  James Matthias; Ellen J Klingler; Julia A Schillinger; Gayle Keller; Craig Wilson; Thomas A Peterman
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  New proteins for a new perspective on syphilis diagnosis.

Authors:  Brenden C Smith; Yvonne Simpson; Muhammad G Morshed; Laura L E Cowen; Rebecca Hof; Charmaine Wetherell; Caroline E Cameron
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Reverse syphilis screening algorithm fails to demonstrate cost effectiveness in persons living with HIV.

Authors:  Ellen F Eaton; Winston Joe; Meredith L Kilgore; Christina A Muzny
Journal:  Int J STD AIDS       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 1.359

10.  Serologic Testing for Syphilis: Benefits and Challenges of a Reverse Algorithm.

Authors:  Katherine Soreng; Roma Levy; Yetunde Fakile
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Newsl       Date:  2014-12-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.