Literature DB >> 29528995

Reactor Grids for Prioritizing Syphilis Investigations: Are Primary Syphilis Cases Being Missed?

Susan Cha, James M Matthias, Mohammad Rahman, Julia A Schillinger, Bruce W Furness, River A Pugsley, Sarah Kidd1, Kyle T Bernstein1, Thomas A Peterman1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Health departments prioritize investigations of reported reactive serologic tests based on age, gender, and titer using reactor grids. We wondered how reactor grids are used in different programs, and if administratively closing investigations of low-titer tests could lead to missed primary syphilis cases.
METHODS: We obtained a convenience sample of reactor grids from 13 health departments. Interviews with staff from several jurisdictions described the role of grids in surveillance and intervention. From 5 jurisdictions, trends in reactive nontreponemal tests and syphilis cases over time (2006-2015) were assessed by gender, age, and titer. In addition, nationally-reported primary syphilis cases (2013-2015) were analyzed to determine what proportion had low titers (≤1:4) that might be administratively closed by grids without further investigation.
RESULTS: Grids and follow-up approaches varied widely. Health departments in the study received a total of 48,573 to 496,503 reactive serologies over a 10-year period (3044-57,242 per year). In 2006 to 2015, the number of reactive serologies increased 37% to 169%. Increases were largely driven by tests for men although the ratios of tests per reported case remained stable over time. Almost one quarter of reported primary syphilis had low titers that would be excluded by most grids. The number of potentially missed primary syphilis cases varied by gender and age with 41- to 54-year-old men accounting for most.
CONCLUSIONS: Reactor grids that close tests with low titers or from older individuals may miss some primary syphilis cases. Automatic, computerized record searches of all reactive serologic tests could help improve prioritization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29528995      PMCID: PMC6129433          DOI: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000833

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sex Transm Dis        ISSN: 0148-5717            Impact factor:   2.830


  20 in total

1.  LABORATORY REPORTING OF SYPHILIS REACTORS IN THE LOS ANGELES PROGRAM.

Authors:  S DANDOY; E M MCKENNA
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1964-11       Impact factor: 2.792

Review 2.  Screening for Syphilis: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  Amy G Cantor; Miranda Pappas; Monica Daeges; Heidi D Nelson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Discordant results from reverse sequence syphilis screening--five laboratories, United States, 2006-2010.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2011-02-11       Impact factor: 17.586

4.  Prevalence of Traditional and Reverse-Algorithm Syphilis Screening in Laboratory Practice: A Survey of Participants in the College of American Pathologists Syphilis Serology Proficiency Testing Program.

Authors:  Daniel D Rhoads; Jonathan R Genzen; Christine P Bashleben; James D Faix; M Qasim Ansari
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2016-10-20       Impact factor: 5.534

5.  STD screening, testing, case reporting, and clinical and partner notification practices: a national survey of US physicians.

Authors:  Janet S St Lawrence; Daniel E Montaño; Danuta Kasprzyk; William R Phillips; Keira Armstrong; Jami S Leichliter
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Reinfections during the Florida syphilis epidemic, 2000-2008.

Authors:  Toye H Brewer; Thomas A Peterman; Daniel R Newman; Karla Schmitt
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 2.830

7.  Evaluation of syphilis reactor grids: optimizing impact.

Authors:  Joshua K Schaffzin; Emilia H Koumans; Richard H Kahn; Lauri E Markowitz
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.830

Review 8.  Laboratory diagnosis and interpretation of tests for syphilis.

Authors:  S A Larsen; B M Steiner; A H Rudolph
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 26.132

9.  Progress in increasing electronic reporting of laboratory results to public health agencies--United States, 2013.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2013-09-27       Impact factor: 17.586

Review 10.  Reported estimates of adverse pregnancy outcomes among women with and without syphilis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jiabi Qin; Tubao Yang; Shuiyuan Xiao; Hongzhuan Tan; Tiejian Feng; Hanlin Fu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

1.  Frequency and Characteristics of Biological False-Positive Test Results for Syphilis Reported in Florida and New York City, USA, 2013 to 2017.

Authors:  James Matthias; Ellen J Klingler; Julia A Schillinger; Gayle Keller; Craig Wilson; Thomas A Peterman
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Enhancing the Control of Syphilis Among Men Who Have Sex With Men by Focusing on Acute Infectious Primary Syphilis and Core Transmission Groups.

Authors:  Robert A Gunn; Jeffrey D Klausner
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 2.830

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.