Literature DB >> 31456213

Having your cake and eating it too: Flexibility and power with mass univariate statistics for ERP data.

Eric C Fields1,2,3, Gina R Kuperberg1,4.   

Abstract

ERP studies produce large spatiotemporal data sets. These rich data sets are key to enabling us to understand cognitive and neural processes. However, they also present a massive multiple comparisons problem, potentially leading to a large number of studies with false positive effects (a high Type I error rate). Standard approaches to ERP statistical analysis, which average over time windows and regions of interest, do not always control for Type I error, and their inflexibility can lead to low power to detect true effects. Mass univariate approaches offer an alternative analytic method. However, they have thus far been viewed as appropriate primarily for exploratory statistical analysis and only applicable to simple designs. Here, we present new simulation studies showing that permutation-based mass univariate tests can be employed with complex factorial designs. Most importantly, we show that mass univariate approaches provide slightly greater power than traditional spatiotemporal averaging approaches when strong a priori time windows and spatial regions are used. Moreover, their power decreases only modestly when more exploratory spatiotemporal parameters are used. We argue that mass univariate approaches are preferable to traditional spatiotemporal averaging analysis approaches for many ERP studies.
© 2019 Society for Psychophysiological Research.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EEG; ERP; mass univariate; multiple comparisons; power; replicability; statistics

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31456213      PMCID: PMC7269415          DOI: 10.1111/psyp.13468

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychophysiology        ISSN: 0048-5772            Impact factor:   4.016


  49 in total

1.  Global, voxel, and cluster tests, by theory and permutation, for a difference between two groups of structural MR images of the brain.

Authors:  E T Bullmore; J Suckling; S Overmeyer; S Rabe-Hesketh; E Taylor; M J Brammer
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  Null hypothesis significance testing: a review of an old and continuing controversy.

Authors:  R S Nickerson
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2000-06

3.  EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis.

Authors:  Arnaud Delorme; Scott Makeig
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2004-03-15       Impact factor: 2.390

4.  Augmenting mental chronometry: the P300 as a measure of stimulus evaluation time.

Authors:  M Kutas; G McCarthy; E Donchin
Journal:  Science       Date:  1977-08-19       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Cluster-based permutation tests of MEG/EEG data do not establish significance of effect latency or location.

Authors:  Jona Sassenhagen; Dejan Draschkow
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2019-01-18       Impact factor: 4.016

6.  A peculiar prevalence of p values just below .05.

Authors:  E J Masicampo; Daniel R Lalande
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2012-08-02       Impact factor: 2.143

Review 7.  Treating stimuli as a random factor in social psychology: a new and comprehensive solution to a pervasive but largely ignored problem.

Authors:  Charles M Judd; Jacob Westfall; David A Kenny
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2012-05-21

8.  Interpreting event-related brain potential (ERP) distributions: implications of baseline potentials and variability with application to amplitude normalization by vector scaling.

Authors:  Thomas P Urbach; Marta Kutas
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2006-01-30       Impact factor: 3.251

9.  Schizophrenic deficits in the processing of context. A test of a theoretical model.

Authors:  D Servan-Schreiber; J D Cohen; S Steingard
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  1996-12

10.  PSYCHOLOGY. Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science.

Authors: 
Journal:  Science       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  11 in total

1.  Spatial frequency impacts perceptual and attentional ERP components across cultures.

Authors:  Tong Lin; Xin Zhang; Eric C Fields; Robert Sekuler; Angela Gutchess
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 2.310

2.  Emotion, Gender and Gaze Discrimination Tasks do not Differentially Impact the Neural Processing of Angry or Happy Facial Expressions-a Mass Univariate ERP Analysis.

Authors:  Anna Hudson; Amie J Durston; Sarah D McCrackin; Roxane J Itier
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 3.020

3.  Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Covert vs. Overt Emotional Face Processing in Dysphoria.

Authors:  Fern Jaspers-Fayer; Antonio Maffei; Jennifer Goertzen; Killian Kleffner; Ambra Coccaro; Paola Sessa; Mario Liotti
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 3.617

4.  Surprising Threats Accelerate Conscious Perception.

Authors:  Jessica McFadyen; Naotsugu Tsuchiya; Jason B Mattingley; Marta I Garrido
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 3.617

5.  Neural dynamics of pride and shame in social context: an approach with event-related brain electrical potentials.

Authors:  Jose Sánchez-García; Gema Esther Rodríguez; David Hernández-Gutiérrez; Pilar Casado; Sabela Fondevila; Laura Jiménez-Ortega; Francisco Muñoz; Miguel Rubianes; Manuel Martín-Loeches
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 3.270

6.  Late frontal positivity effects in Self-referential Memory: Unique to the Self?

Authors:  Nicole A Porter; Eric C Fields; Isabelle L Moore; Angela Gutchess
Journal:  Soc Neurosci       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 2.381

7.  An ERP investigation of age differences in the negativity bias for self-relevant and non-self-relevant stimuli.

Authors:  Eric C Fields; Holly J Bowen; Ryan T Daley; Katelyn R Parisi; Angela Gutchess; Elizabeth A Kensinger
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2021-02-20       Impact factor: 5.133

8.  Inter- and intra-individual coupling between pupillary, electrophysiological, and behavioral responses in a visual oddball task.

Authors:  Sara LoTemplio; Jack Silcox; Kara D Federmeier; Brennan R Payne
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2020-12-21       Impact factor: 4.348

9.  Downstream Behavioral and Electrophysiological Consequences of Word Prediction on Recognition Memory.

Authors:  Ryan J Hubbard; Joost Rommers; Cassandra L Jacobs; Kara D Federmeier
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  The Automatic but Flexible and Content-Dependent Nature of Syntax.

Authors:  Laura Jiménez-Ortega; Esperanza Badaya; Pilar Casado; Sabela Fondevila; David Hernández-Gutiérrez; Francisco Muñoz; José Sánchez-García; Manuel Martín-Loeches
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.