Literature DB >> 33347634

Inter- and intra-individual coupling between pupillary, electrophysiological, and behavioral responses in a visual oddball task.

Sara LoTemplio1, Jack Silcox1, Kara D Federmeier2, Brennan R Payne1,3.   

Abstract

Although the P3b component of the event-related brain potential is one of the most widely studied components, its underlying generators are not currently well understood. Recent theories have suggested that the P3b is triggered by phasic activation of the locus-coeruleus norepinephrine (LC-NE) system, an important control center implicated in facilitating optimal task-relevant behavior. Previous research has reported strong correlations between pupil dilation and LC activity, suggesting that pupil diameter is a useful indicator for ongoing LC-NE activity. Given the strong relationship between LC activity and pupil dilation, if the P3b is driven by phasic LC activity, there should be a robust trial-to-trial relationship with the phasic pupillary dilation response (PDR). However, previous work examining relationships between concurrently recorded pupillary and P3b responses has not supported this. One possibility is that the relationship between the measures might be carried primarily by either inter-individual (i.e., between-participant) or intra-individual (i.e., within-participant) contributions to coupling, and prior work has not systematically delineated these relationships. Doing so in the current study, we do not find evidence for either inter-individual or intra-individual relationships between the PDR and P3b responses. However, baseline pupil dilation did predict the P3b. Interestingly, both the PDR and P3b independently predicted inter-individual and intra-individual variability in decision response time. Implications for the LC-P3b hypothesis are discussed.
© 2020 Society for Psychophysiological Research.

Entities:  

Keywords:  LC-NE; LC-P3; P3b; methods>EEG; methods>pupillometry

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33347634      PMCID: PMC8457505          DOI: 10.1111/psyp.13758

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychophysiology        ISSN: 0048-5772            Impact factor:   4.348


  78 in total

1.  High-resolution in vivo imaging of human locus coeruleus by magnetization transfer MRI at 3T and 7T.

Authors:  Nikos Priovoulos; Heidi I L Jacobs; Dimo Ivanov; Kâmil Uludağ; Frans R J Verhey; Benedikt A Poser
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-07-22       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Phasic locus coeruleus activity regulates cortical encoding of salience information.

Authors:  Elena M Vazey; David E Moorman; Gary Aston-Jones
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Effect of stimulus uncertainty on the pupillary dilation response and the vertex evoked potential.

Authors:  D Friedman; G Hakerem; S Sutton; J L Fleiss
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1973-05

4.  Comment on "Modafinil shifts human locus coeruleus to low-tonic, high-phasic activity during functional MRI" and "Homeostatic sleep pressure and responses to sustained attention in the suprachiasmatic area".

Authors:  Serguei V Astafiev; Abraham Z Snyder; Gordon L Shulman; Maurizio Corbetta
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-04-16       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Psychophysiology of P300.

Authors:  W S Pritchard
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1981-05       Impact factor: 17.737

6.  The intracranial topography of the P3 event-related potential elicited during auditory oddball.

Authors:  M E Smith; E Halgren; M Sokolik; P Baudena; A Musolino; C Liegeois-Chauvel; P Chauvel
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1990-09

Review 7.  Neural origins of the P300.

Authors:  M Soltani; R T Knight
Journal:  Crit Rev Neurobiol       Date:  2000

8.  Rostral locus coeruleus integrity is associated with better memory performance in older adults.

Authors:  Martin J Dahl; Mara Mather; Sandra Düzel; Nils C Bodammer; Ulman Lindenberger; Simone Kühn; Markus Werkle-Bergner
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2019-09-09

9.  Action boosts episodic memory encoding in humans via engagement of a noradrenergic system.

Authors:  Mar Yebra; Ana Galarza-Vallejo; Vanesa Soto-Leon; Javier J Gonzalez-Rosa; Archy O de Berker; Sven Bestmann; Antonio Oliviero; Marijn C W Kroes; Bryan A Strange
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-08-06       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Genetic determinants of target and novelty-related event-related potentials in the auditory oddball response.

Authors:  Jingyu Liu; Kent A Kiehl; Godfrey Pearlson; Nora I Perrone-Bizzozero; Tom Eichele; Vince D Calhoun
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-03-10       Impact factor: 6.556

View more
  3 in total

1.  Pupil Dilation and the Slow Wave ERP Reflect Surprise about Choice Outcome Resulting from Intrinsic Variability in Decision Confidence.

Authors:  Jan Willem de Gee; Camile M C Correa; Matthew Weaver; Tobias H Donner; Simon van Gaal
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  MEYE: Web App for Translational and Real-Time Pupillometry.

Authors:  Raffaele Mazziotti; Fabio Carrara; Aurelia Viglione; Leonardo Lupori; Luca Lo Verde; Alessandro Benedetto; Giulia Ricci; Giulia Sagona; Giuseppe Amato; Tommaso Pizzorusso
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2021-09-30

3.  Cortical Correlates of Increased Postural Task Difficulty in Young Adults: A Combined Pupillometry and EEG Study.

Authors:  Melike Kahya; Ke Liao; Kathleen M Gustafson; Abiodun E Akinwuntan; Brad Manor; Hannes Devos
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-26       Impact factor: 3.847

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.