| Literature DB >> 31455025 |
Takashi Shiina1, Antoine Blancher2,3.
Abstract
Among the non-human primates used in experimental medicine, cynomolgus macaques (Macaca fascicularis hereafter referred to as Mafa) are increasingly selected for the ease with which they are maintained and bred in captivity. Macaques belong to Old World monkeys and are phylogenetically much closer to humans than rodents, which are still the most frequently used animal model. Our understanding of the Mafa genome has progressed rapidly in recent years and has greatly benefited from the latest technical advances in molecular genetics. Cynomolgus macaques are widespread in Southeast Asia and numerous studies have shown a distinct genetic differentiation of continental and island populations. The major histocompatibility complex of cynomolgus macaque (Mafa MHC) is organized in the same way as that of human, but it differs from the latter by its high degree of classical class I gene duplication. Human polymorphic MHC regions play a pivotal role in allograft transplantation and have been associated with more than 100 diseases and/or phenotypes. The Mafa MHC polymorphism similarly plays a crucial role in experimental allografts of organs and stem cells. Experimental results show that the Mafa MHC class I and II regions influence the ability to mount an immune response against infectious pathogens and vaccines. MHC also affects cynomolgus macaque reproduction and impacts on numerous biological parameters. This review describes the Mafa MHC polymorphism and the methods currently used to characterize it. We discuss some of the major areas of experimental medicine where an effect induced by MHC polymorphism has been demonstrated.Entities:
Keywords: MHC polymorphism; Macaca fascicularis; cynomolgus macaque; experimental medicine; nonhuman primate models
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31455025 PMCID: PMC6770713 DOI: 10.3390/cells8090978
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cells ISSN: 2073-4409 Impact factor: 6.600
Figure 1Milestones of cynomolgus macaque MHC studies.
Figure 2Comparative genome map of the HLA and Mafa regions. The number of Mafa-A, Mafa-B, and Mafa-DRB loci varies from one haplotype to another (Mafa-A from 1 to 3 loci, Mafa-B/I from 2 to 9, Mafa-DRB from 2 to 4). The numbers below the boxes indicate the number of alleles based on the IPD-IMGT/HLA version 3.35 and IPD-MHC version 3.2.0.0 database. The numbers of Mafa-A, Mafa-B and Mafa-DRB alleles correspond to the allele numbers of all Mafa-A loci (Mafa-A1 to -A6 and Mafa-A8), all Mafa-B loci (Mafa-B, -B11L -B12, -B16, -B17, -B20 and -B21), as well as all Mafa-DRB loci (Mafa-DRB*W, -DRB1, -DRB3, -DRB4, -DRB5 and -DRB6). For more details on allele numbers, see Table 1.
Allele numbers of MHC genes in human and cynomolgus macaque.
| Region | Allele Group | HLA Locus | Allele Num. | Allele Num. | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Class I | MHC-F | HLA-F | 44 | 8 | |
| MHC-G | HLA-G | 68 | 10 | ||
| MHC-AG | X | X | 36 | ||
| MHC-A | HLA-A | 5,018 | 320 | ||
| 83 | |||||
| 30 | |||||
| 38 | |||||
| 8 | |||||
| 14 | |||||
| 1 | |||||
| MHC-E | HLA-E | 30 | 16 | ||
| MHC-C | HLA-C | 4,852 | X | X | |
| MHC-B | HLA-B | 6,096 | 717 | ||
| 5 | |||||
| 11 | |||||
| 4 | |||||
| 2 | |||||
| 2 | |||||
| MHC-I | X | X | 76 | ||
| Class II | MHC-DR | HLA-DRA | 7 | 52 | |
| HLA-DRB1 | 2,403 | 160 | |||
| HLA-DRB3 | 217 | 82 | |||
| HLA-DRB4 | 108 | 13 | |||
| HLA-DRB5 | 77 | 10 | |||
| 18 | |||||
| 35 | |||||
| MHC-DQ | HLA-DQA1 | 149 | 100 | ||
| HLA-DQB1 | 1,560 | 107 | |||
| MHC-DO | HLA-DOA | 12 | 15 | ||
| HLA-DOB | 13 | 16 | |||
| MHC-DM | HLA-DMA | 7 | 11 | ||
| HLA-DMB | 13 | 7 | |||
| MHC-DP | HLA-DPA1 | 106 | 91 | ||
| HLA-DPB1 | 1,360 | 98 | |||
| Total | 22,140 | 2196 |
The HLA and Mafa MHC allele numbers refer to IPD-IMGT/HLA Release 3.36.0 and IPD-MHC Release 3.2.0.0 (2018-12-18) build 780, respectively.
Cynomolgus macaque MHC polymorphism in various populations.
| Reference | Year | Population of Macaques | Class I | Class I | Class I | Class I | Class I | DRA | DRB Exon 2 | DRB cDNA | Class II Others | Microsat. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Boyson et al. [ | 1995 | Not specified | X | |||||||||
| Gaur and Nepom [ | 1996 | Not specified | X | |||||||||
| Alvarez et al. [ | 1997 | Not specified | X | |||||||||
| Otting et al. [ | 2002 | Not specified | DQB | |||||||||
| Leuchte et al. [ | 2004 | Mauritius | X | |||||||||
| Uda et al. [ | 2004 | Not specified | X | |||||||||
| Krebs et al. [ | 2005 | Vietnam, Mauritius, Chinese breeding facilities | X (RSCA) (1) | X (RSCA) | ||||||||
| Uda et al. [ | 2005 | Not specified | X | X | ||||||||
| Blancher et al. [ | 2006 | Mauritius, The Philippines | X | |||||||||
| Sano K et al. [ | 2006 | Indonesia, Vietnam, The Philippines | DPB1 | |||||||||
| Doxiadis et al. [ | 2006 | Indonesia Malaysia Thailand Java Sumatra Vietnam, Chinese breeding facilities | X | DPB1, DQA1, DQB1 | ||||||||
| O’Connor et al. [ | 2007 | Mauritius | X | X | X | DPA, DPB, DQA, DQB, | X | |||||
| Wiseman et al. [ | 2007 | Mauritius | X (RSCA) | X (RSCA) | X | X | ||||||
| Pendley et al. [ | 2008 | Indonesia | X | X | X | |||||||
| Wiseman et al. [ | 2009 | Mauritius | X | X | ||||||||
| Campbell et al. [ | 2009 | The Philippines | X | X | X | |||||||
| Kita et al. [ | 2009 | Indonesia, Vietnam, The Philippines | X | |||||||||
| Aarnink et al. [ | 2010 | Indonesia, Mauritius, The Philippines, Vietnam | X | X | ||||||||
| Craeger et al. [ | 2011 | Indonesia and Vietnam | X | X | DPA, DPB, DQA, DQB, cDNA | |||||||
| Ling et al. [ | 2011 | Vietnam | DOB, DPB1, DQB1 | |||||||||
| Blancher et al. [ | 2012 | The Philippines Java, Vietnam, Mauritius | X | X | X | |||||||
| Ling et al. [ | 2012 | Vietnam | X | X | DQB1 | |||||||
| Mitchell et al. [ | 2012 | Indonesia | X (RSCA) | X (RSCA) | X | |||||||
| de Groot et al. [ | 2014 | Indonesia, Indochina | X | X | X | DQA, DQB | X | |||||
| Shiina et al. [ | 2015 | The Philippines | X | X | X | X | X | |||||
| Karl et al. [ | 2017 | Chinese breeding facilities | X | X | X |
RSCA: (1) Reference strand conformational analysis.
Example of inter-population comparison based on MHC polymorphism.
| Locus | Total Allele Num. | Vietnamese | Indonesian | Filipino |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 76 | 34 | 32 | 13 | |
| 22 | 17 | _ | 12 | |
| 134 | 84 | 60 | 35 | |
| 40 | 26 | 23 | 12 |
Figure 3Examples of useful animals for non-clinical transplantation studies. Colored background shows MHC haplotype composition of HT1-type. (A) genotype of an HT1 homozygous animal, (B) genotype of an HT1 heterozygous animal (C) genotype of a heterozygous animal which has two haplotypes differing form HT1.
Figure 4The iPS cell transplantation model and application for iPS cell transplantation study using MHC defined cynomolgus macaques. (A) This monkey model is used for analyses of engraftment rate of transplanted cells and inflammatory responses and used for evaluating safety and usefulness of iPS cell transplantation. (B) Summary of transplantation outcome between MHC matched recipient and mismatched recipient. MHC type mismatch in transplantation causes severe rejection. This transplantation model can be applied to the development of a therapy for suppressing graft rejection and an efficient protocol of an immunosuppressant.