Literature DB >> 2504360

Evaluation of a call programme for cervical cytology screening in women aged 50-60.

A J Robertson1, G S Reid, C A Stoker, C Bissett, N Waugh, I Fenton, J Rowan, R Halkerston.   

Abstract

For many years Tayside has benefited from a successful opportunistic cytology screening programme. In recent years, however, the decrease in mortality due to cervical cancer has levelled off, with most cases of severe disease arising in women who have not been screened. In view of this the health board developed a new computer system for call and recall based on the community health index. This facility allowed the unscreened population to be identified and located on an individual general practice basis. The findings of the call programme in the 3136 women aged 50-60 were studied. The 29 practices in Perth and Kinross participated in the scheme. Before the call started 4287 out of 7423 (58%) women had been screened, and after the call programme this had risen to 5109 (69%). Moreover, a further 1158 (15%) women were identified who had a valid reason for exclusion from the programme. This meant that 6267 (84%) women of the study population were accounted for by the system. The call programme in Tayside will be completed in 1989 and will include all women aged 20-60.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2504360      PMCID: PMC1837041          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.299.6692.163

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  13 in total

1.  Differential response to recall in a cervical screening programme.

Authors:  C D Sansom; J MacInerney; V Oliver; J Wakefield
Journal:  Br J Prev Soc Med       Date:  1975-03

2.  Recall of women in a cervical cytology screening programme. An estimate of the true rate of response.

Authors:  C D Sansom; J MacInerney; V Oliver; J Wakefield; R Yule
Journal:  Br J Prev Soc Med       Date:  1975-06

3.  Screening: the inadequacy of population registers.

Authors:  A Bowling; B Jacobson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1989-03-04

4.  Is there a need for a place-of-work cervical smear service?

Authors:  G Reid; R Halkerston; A J Robertson
Journal:  Health Bull (Edinb)       Date:  1988-05

5.  Cervical cytology consent rate.

Authors:  J Saunders; A H Snaith
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1969-07-26       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Preliminary results of a district call scheme for cervical screening organised in general practice.

Authors:  C M Havelock; J Webb; J Queenborough
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1988-11-26

7.  A survey of cervical smear screening in general practice.

Authors:  J T Spenser
Journal:  Practitioner       Date:  1967-02

8.  Patient movements and the accuracy of the age--sex register.

Authors:  R C Fraser
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1982

9.  Cervical screening in an inner city area: response to a call system in general practice.

Authors:  K J Shroff; A M Corrigan; M Bosher; M P Edmonds; D Sacks; D V Coleman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1988-11-19

10.  Cervical screening in general practice: call and recall.

Authors:  L L Ridsdale
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1987-06
View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Screening for presymptomatic disease.

Authors:  F V Flynn
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Screening for cancer of the cervix.

Authors:  N R Waugh
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 3.710

3.  Evaluation of a call programme for cervical cytology screening.

Authors:  K J Shroff
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1989-08-26

4.  Randomized controlled study of customized preventive medicine reminder letters in a community practice.

Authors:  W E Hogg; M Bass; N Calonge; H Crouch; G Satenstein
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 3.275

5.  Effectiveness of a call/recall system in improving compliance with cervical cancer screening: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  S K Buehler; W L Parsons
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1997-09-01       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Recruitment methods for screening programmes: trial of a new method within a regional osteoporosis study.

Authors:  M J Garton; D J Torgerson; C Donaldson; I T Russell; D M Reid
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-07-11

7.  Preliminary results of a general practice based call system for cervical cancer screening in The Netherlands.

Authors:  B T Palm; A C Kant; W J van den Bosch; G P Vooijs; C van Weel
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 5.386

8.  Cervical screening: the optimum visit plan for contacting users and non-users in Scotland.

Authors:  I K Crombie; S Orbell; G Johnston; A J Robertson; M Kenicer
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 3.710

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.