| Literature DB >> 31443151 |
Samuel D Salinas1, Margaret M Clark1, Rouzbeh Amini2.
Abstract
Since many soft tissues function in an isotonic in-vivo environment, it is expected that physiological osmolarity will be maintained when conducting experiments on these tissues ex-vivo. In this study, we aimed to examine how not adhering to such a practice may alter the mechanical response of the tricuspid valve (TV) anterior leaflet. Tissue specimens were immersed in deionized (DI) water prior to quantification of the stress-strain responses using an in-plane biaxial mechanical testing device. Following a two-hour immersion in DI water, the tissue thickness increased an average of 107.3% in the DI water group compared to only 6.8% in the control group, in which the tissue samples were submerged in an isotonic phosphate buffered saline solution for the same period of time. Tissue strains evaluated at 85 kPa revealed a significant reduction in the radial direction, from 34.8% to 20%, following immersion in DI water. However, no significant change was observed in the control group. Our study demonstrated the impact of a hypo-osmotic environment on the mechanical response of TV anterior leaflet. The imbalance in ions leads to water absorption in the valvular tissue that can alter its mechanical response. As such, in ex-vivo experiments for which the native mechanical response of the valves is important, using an isotonic buffer solution is essential.Entities:
Keywords: biaxial mechanical testing; cardiac valves; osmotic swelling
Year: 2019 PMID: 31443151 PMCID: PMC6784000 DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering6030070
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Bioengineering (Basel) ISSN: 2306-5354
Loading protocol for radial and circumferential directions.
| Protocol | Radial (kPa) | Circum. (kPa) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 127 | 127 |
| 2 | 95.25 | 127 |
| 3 | 127 | 95.25 |
| 4 | 63.5 | 127 |
| 5 | 127 | 63.5 |
Figure 1Average equibiaxial response of the anterior leaflet (i.e., Protocol 1 in Table 1) from: (a) DI water group; (b) control group (soaked in PBS). Shaded regions represent standard error.
Average thickness of anterior leaflets in DI water group and control group.
| Heart | DI-Pre | DI-Post | Control-Pre | Control-Post |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 424 | 924 | 269 | 299 |
| 2 | 391 | 627 | 237 | 325 |
| 3 | 314 | 662 | 342 | 393 |
| 4 | 259 | 490 | 312 | 350 |
| 5 | 246 | 467 | 287 | 284 |
| 6 | 317 | 548 | 233 | 259 |
| 7 | 254 | 482 | 287 | 284 |
| 8 | 332 | 416 | 223 | 226 |
| 9 | 337 | 614 | 246 | 251 |
| 10 | 299 | 599 | 223 | 228 |
| 11 | 322 | 609 | 348 | 378 |
| 12 | 350 | 548 | 343 | 396 |
| 13 | 224 | 1061 | 335 | 365 |
| 14 | 315 | 1046 | 269 | 279 |
| Average | 313 | 650 | 289 | 308 |
| Std. Dev. | 53 | 201 | 44 | 57 |
| <0.001 | 0.002 | |||
Note: All thickness values reported in this table are in microns.
Figure 2Average equibiaxial strain across all samples at an estimated physiological stress level of 85 kPa in: (a) DI water group; (b) control group. Error bars represent standard error.